Just FYI, here you can see which packages were already rebuilt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0tagID=199order=-build_idlatest=1
Vit
___
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Mo Morsi wrote, at 01/26/2012 06:46 AM +9:00:
On 01/19/2012 06:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi rubyists,
yesterday evening, we finally obtained tag/target [1] for our Ruby 1.9.3
rebuild. Following that, I immediately build Ruby 1.9.3 there and following
with gems I own or maintain. I would like
Hi,
I added updated versions (3.0.11) of rails-related packages to my repo. They
are only available as SRPMS at [1], I didn't create git repos this time.
Please, whoever starts updating these packages first, prefer the new 3.0.11
version over the older 3.0.10.
Regards, Bohuslav.
[1]
Hi rubyists,
yesterday evening, we finally obtained tag/target [1] for our Ruby 1.9.3
rebuild. Following that, I immediately build Ruby 1.9.3 there and
following with gems I own or maintain. I would like to ask you to
support me in this effort. I'd like to see to majority of packages
rebuild
=== BigDecimal ===
We moved BigDecimal out of Ruby into separated thread. If you package
fails with message like:
/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': cannot
load such file -- bigdecimal (LoadError)
Please add BuildRequires: rubygem(bigdecimal) into your package.
On 01/19/2012 06:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi rubyists,
yesterday evening, we finally obtained tag/target [1] for our Ruby
1.9.3 rebuild. Following that, I immediately build Ruby 1.9.3 there
and following with gems I own or maintain. I would like to ask you to
support me in this effort. I'd
- Original Message -
On 01/19/2012 06:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi rubyists,
yesterday evening, we finally obtained tag/target [1] for our Ruby
1.9.3 rebuild. Following that, I immediately build Ruby 1.9.3 there
and following with gems I own or maintain. I would like to ask you
