Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Well, this is not the way you can get the right archive. You have to use something like: ~~~ tool/make-snapshot -packages=xz tmp ~~~ I previously published script which can generate the tarball using mock and update the spec file:

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Jun Aruga
Thanks for that. I want you to add below kind of comment somethere in "private-ruby-2.5" branch or master ruby.spec file a way to create Source0 file. # git clone https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git && cd ruby # git archive --prefix=ruby-2.5.0-r61214/ 06d36a1 | xz > ruby-2.5.0-r61214.tar.xz

Re: Hey Ruby packagers: can you help with asciibinder and its dependencies?

2017-12-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056 I submitted review for rubygem-ascii_doctor. The guard is on its way: https://gitlab.com/jackorp/rubygem-guard although there will be necessary to resolve funny issues such as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064#c9 Vít

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Aleksandar Kostadinov
Do we have a requirements document about ruby packaging? I'm all for avoiding upstream incompatibilities which we are currently not doing for some reasons. And having an official requirements document will make more clear what is a bug and what is a feature. Jun Aruga wrote on 12/14/17 19:23:

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14.12.2017 v 18:23 Jun Aruga napsal(a): > OK thanks for the info. > > Comparing the result of "gem list" command between upstream and our > Fedora package, I found the difference. > That can be confusing people. > > Some of the gem are not shown in the result such as cmath for Fedora >

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Jun Aruga
OK thanks for the info. Comparing the result of "gem list" command between upstream and our Fedora package, I found the difference. That can be confusing people. Some of the gem are not shown in the result such as cmath for Fedora package ruby. When running below command on mock, we can load

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14.12.2017 v 18:41 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 14.12.2017 v 18:23 Jun Aruga napsal(a): >> OK thanks for the info. >> >> Comparing the result of "gem list" command between upstream and our >> Fedora package, I found the difference. >> That can be confusing people. >> >> Some of the gem are

Re: Ruby 2.5

2017-12-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi everybody, Here is another test build of Ruby 2.5, this time it is r61214. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23681673 As always, you can find the .spec file in private-ruby-2.5 branch of ruby dist-gits. Vít Dne 13.4.2017 v 10:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi all, > > Ruby