Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-20 Thread Germano Massullo
Il 20/09/2016 11:18, Jun Aruga ha scritto: > Hi Germano, > > I am going to review it one by one. > > Jun Aruga > Thank you very much ___ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-20 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi Germano, I am going to review it one by one. Jun Aruga - Original Message - > From: "Germano Massullo" <germano.massu...@gmail.com> > To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:21:58 A

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-19 Thread Germano Massullo
Anybody interested in making review swaps? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370135 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370138 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370153

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-12 Thread Germano Massullo
Anybody interested? ___ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-05 Thread Germano Massullo
2016-09-05 9:34 GMT+02:00 Vít Ondruch : > Is there test suite? Yes but it relies on too many unpackages dependencies, so I cannot run it at the moment. > Also, I'd suggest you to provide updated SRPM and Koji scratch build to > rhbz#1253999 I will do it > and also verify

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-05 Thread Vít Ondruch
Is there test suite? Is it passing with older rubygem-timers? Then just relax the dependency and move on. If somebody finds/reports some issue later, then fix it (possibly by updating rubygem-timers). Also, I'd suggest you to provide updated SRPM and Koji scratch build to rhbz#1253999 and also

Re: Celluloid back to Fedora

2016-09-03 Thread Germano Massullo
Il 27/08/2016 13:14, Mamoru TASAKA ha scritto: > If the strict dependency ">= 4.1.1" for rubygem(timer) > is not needed, you can sed %{gem_name}.gemspec to > relax dependency. Unluckly I have not received any reply from upstream developer ___ ruby-sig