On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Charles Hixson
wrote:
> The point was that because it's hard to tell what is fast and what is slow,
> bad decisions are often made.
The situation is not that bad. For example, we know that - from a
certain number of entries on - it is much faster to use hash loo
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Charles Hixson
wrote:
> FWIW, I would prefer to be using a faster language, but I also prefer a
> language that's rapid to develop in. And "premature optimization" is a
> problem that is endemic to programmers that are concerned about execution
> speed.
+2
> Qui
