I created a stackoverflow question for this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13550754/what-project-files-belong-in-a-gem-package
I am especially curious as to people's opinions about whether a gem should
be an almost complete image the project folder, or just include minimum
files needed
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 8:08:03 PM UTC-5, Eric Hodel wrote:
>
>
> Multiple gems at once. At the top level you can type to filter on
> installed gems.
>
Awesome!
>
> Currently it uses the darkish generator. Due to lack of time I haven't
> investigated alternate output templates. Allowi
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Prog Rammer wrote:
> There are two rb files:
>
> run_work.rb
> --
> #some code here
> children=[]
> str="ruby work.rb"
> children< system(str)
> end
> children.each do |c|
> c.join
> end
> puts 'third'
> #some code here
>
>
> work.rb
> --
> children=
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Joel Pearson wrote:
> If you do trust your user enough to let them execute system commands (I
> assume this is your goal with the backticks), I think the way to input a
> variable is this:
>
> system("#{op}")
Superfluous - this is sufficient:
system op
If you do
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Masoud Ahmadi wrote:
> This row solved my problem,
> if op == "Q\n"
> I was not aware of this little new line thing
Just a note on that one: I think this solution is inferior to doing
op.chomp!
if op == "Q"
or
if op.chomp == "Q"
Reason: on other platforms you
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Uwe Kubosch wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We are using REXML to modify XML files in our project, and we experience that
> the attributes of all tags are always reordered. For XML files that are
> checked into source control, this generates unnecessary noise.
>
> Is there
