On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Marc Heiler wrote:
> Who uses .push when .<< is so much nicer.
That lies in the eye of the beholder, doesn't it? A typical use case
is when you want to append several values which are not stored in an
Enumerable. Using << can become quite lengthy because " << " t
The note `TODO: Improve Hash#rekey code!!!` has been in my docs for too
long. I could use other's insights and thought others might enjoy the
challenge. So here's the code:
require 'facets/na'
class Hash
# Rekey a hash:
#
# rekey()
# rekey(from_key => to_key, ...)
#
>
>
> irb(main):013:0> ["foo"].push(*"abc".chars)
> => ["foo", "a", "b", "c"]
>
>
A bit beside the point though. I was wondering if #concat should be able to
handle an Enumerator.
But I didn't know push could take more than one argument, so that's
something learned today. Thanks!
-- You r
>
>
> How did you go about it exactly? How does this differ from say, running
`pry` and `include FileUtils` at toplevel?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
ruby-talk-google group. To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ferdous ara wrote:
> may be i need to design my logic in a different way
> let me explain
>
> basically in that hash table (out put of JSON)
>
> as key => value
>
>
>
> i got like this
> [
> {
> "notes_expanded" : "check_maintanance_mode",
> "host_comments" :
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Ferdous ara wrote:
> but will this work : #value["host_display_name"] ??
> I will try in a bit ..
No. For lookup by value you can use Hash#rassoc:
irb(main):003:0> h={"foo" => "bar"}
=> {"foo"=>"bar"}
irb(main):004:0> h.rassoc "bar"
=> ["foo", "bar"]
irb(main):0
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ferdous ara wrote:
> HI thanks
> but i found the solution
>
> i had to use , because its using the Basica Auth mode in apache, the
> bellow command fix the issue
>
>
> request.basic_auth 'xxx','xxx'
i'd also look into mechanize gem if you do need to to more
intera
