On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Peter Hickman
wrote:
> Ruby supports the if, else statements so it is fine to use it. It is just a
> personal preference of mine. There is nothing "better" about using the case
> statement (well none that I am aware of).
Maybe that "case" conveys the notion of sev
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Joel Pearson wrote:
> If you do trust your user enough to let them execute system commands (I
> assume this is your goal with the backticks), I think the way to input a
> variable is this:
>
> system("#{op}")
Superfluous - this is sufficient:
system op
If you do
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Masoud Ahmadi wrote:
> This row solved my problem,
> if op == "Q\n"
> I was not aware of this little new line thing
Just a note on that one: I think this solution is inferior to doing
op.chomp!
if op == "Q"
or
if op.chomp == "Q"
Reason: on other platforms you
