Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
BTW it seems that there will be something like jruby-debug soon. I hope
I will have enough time to participate a lot on this piece. Might be
another debug-commons child or jruby-extras, does not matter to much.
jruby-debug would
Hi again,
I'm going to merged support of next+ and step+ into ruby-debug-ide (will
be 0.1.3). This is a new feature added by Kent into ruby-debug 0.9.1:
http://www.datanoise.com/articles/2007/4/3/ruby-debug-version-0-9-1-has-been-released
I've also notice that
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
Hi,
so the project is alive:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/debug-commons/
Hi again,
sorry for constant disturbing :) But more to set up on. I've started
filling tasks and bugs I'm working on directly to debug-commons
tracker[1] so we pretend duplicating the effort
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
TBD: mainly adding ruby-debug.rb
I've just update Kent's ruby-debug and it seems that Markus was
successful with propagating his changes directly there into v 0.8, right
Markus? Congratulations! :) So there is no need to make it part of
debug-commons any more
Markus Barchfeld wrote:
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
TBD: mainly adding ruby-debug.rb
I've just update Kent's ruby-debug and it seems that Markus was
successful with propagating his changes directly there into v 0.8, right
Markus? Congratulations! :) So
Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Christopher Williams wrote:
We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
This'll be a usability problem, so
Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Martin Krauskopf wrote:
Yes, this is what I'm beginning to work on. It will be bunch of small
-Test::Unit::TestCase-s which will be testing every corner of the
protocol, runnable against whatever Ruby implementation. So it will as
well catch every
Markus Barchfeld wrote:
Any preferences for the name of the project? Remote Debug? Or Remote
Debug Commons? :)
I think commons is important, so Remote Debug Commons or Debugger
Commons sounds good.
BTW is anybody actively working on FTC_ClassicDebuggerCommunicationTest?
I've noticed
Hi,
I would like to start talk about the topic on this list. We exchanged
few emails about it with Chris, Markus and murphee and I see more and
more people invoked, like Mirko. I wasn't aware that so much developers
contribute just to the debugger.
So as we discussed it would be great if
