Re: [RDT-Dev] Getting another build of RDT (RemoteTestRunner)

2006-04-06 Thread David Corbin
On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:09, Kyle Shank wrote: Did you check this into HEAD? I did. On 4/5/06, David Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's fixed. I don't understand why I see it in RDT, and not when using the console test runner, but I think my fix is a good one. And I really don't

Re: [RDT-Dev] Getting another build of RDT (RemoteTestRunner)

2006-04-05 Thread David Corbin
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 08:29 pm, David Corbin wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 07:27 pm, David Corbin wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 07:20 pm, David Corbin wrote: On Wednesday 05 April 2006 06:41 pm, you wrote: Exactly what 'parameters' are specified in the test launch? I

Re: [RDT-Dev] Getting another build of RDT

2006-04-04 Thread Christopher Williams
All, I think an 0.8.0 release (at least a release candidate) is do-able. We already have a lot of functionality since the 0.7.0 release, and it's been working fine for me (I patched bugs with the new browsing stuff locally, but until just now SF.net's CVS was down so I just checked them

Re: [RDT-Dev] Getting another build of RDT

2006-04-04 Thread Kyle Shank
The RemoteTestRunner issue is a result of the new Rails integration testing. They define a default_test in ActionController::IntegrationTest that gets picked up by the test runner because it extends Test::Unit::TestCase. What happens is that if there are 9 real tests that all pass the bar will