Re: [RDT-Dev] debugger: stepReturn fix, next+, step+ support

2007-05-02 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Hi Martin! I'm going to merged support of next+ and step+ into ruby-debug-ide (will be 0.1.3). This is a new feature added by Kent into ruby-debug 0.9.1: http://www.datanoise.com/articles/2007/4/3/ruby-debug-version-0-9-1-has-been-released Yes. Thanks. In the last days Kent has

Re: [RDT-Dev] RDT 0.9.0?

2007-03-02 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Christopher Williams wrote: Markus, On 3/1/07, Markus Barchfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Williams wrote: Markus, A couple things: 1. The nightly builds seem to have PRD qualifier at the end now. Shouldn't it be NGT? I think it's messing up my config so I'm not sure

Re: [RDT-Dev] Ruby-debug integration

2007-02-26 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Outside of this work do we have any other outstanding stuff to be looked at for the 0.9.0? [] Only some cleanup: It still seems as if there are two sets of constants which are used as keys in the launch configuration. Could we merge them? The other failing test is for the interpreter

Re: [RDT-Dev] Ready for debug-commons

2007-02-13 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Martin Krauskopf wrote: Martin Krauskopf wrote: TBD: mainly adding ruby-debug.rb I've just update Kent's ruby-debug and it seems that Markus was successful with propagating his changes directly there into v 0.8, right Markus? Congratulations! :) So there is no need to make it

Re: [RDT-Dev] Refactorings - initial import

2007-02-06 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Christopher Williams wrote: There are still some things that need to be addressed: - Cruisecontrol: The plug-ins aren't built and integrated into the automated build yet and I'm not sure what needs to be done. Markus? OK. Build is up again. Your modifications to the feature.xml and

Re: [RDT-Dev] Refactorings - initial import

2007-02-06 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Hi Chris! I guess it'd be nice if I knew how to do some of the more common things we do: Set up a new release and add/remove a plugin. I'd be fumbling quite a bit to do either of those... The release stuff is pretty well explained in the wiki. Adding/removing a plug-in is like * make sure

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Any preferences for the name of the project? Remote Debug? Or Remote Debug Commons? :) I think commons is important, so Remote Debug Commons or Debugger Commons sounds good. BTW is anybody actively working on FTC_ClassicDebuggerCommunicationTest? I've noticed that always when there is

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Markus Barchfeld
BTW on which version of debug.rb is eclipseDebug.rb built on? According to: http://rubyeclipse.mktec.com/cgi-bin/trac.py/ticket/225 it seems quite old. There was not merged fix in debug.rb which was five years old. That might be. I started on eclipseDebug.rb in 2002 on stable

Re: [RDT-Dev] State of RDT

2007-01-23 Thread Markus Barchfeld
I also managed to break the RI/RDoc stuff in the process, as well as launching debug mode and Test::Unit. I went back and fixed as much as I could, but Markus, Martin and others I could use some help making sure that debugging is set up to work OK again. Chris, I tried to launch a rdebug

Re: [RDT-Dev] Updating JRuby?

2007-01-16 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Mirko Stocker wrote: On Monday 15 January 2007 15:34, Markus Barchfeld wrote: As version number I would suggest the base version of JRuby (0.9.2) plus maybe the revision number of JRuby's subversion as qualifier (2742). So, if you create a jar from the current trunk of JRuby, the version

Re: [RDT-Dev] Updating JRuby?

2007-01-15 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Mirko Stocker wrote: On Monday 15 January 2007 14:32, Christopher Williams wrote: Mirko, Feel free to update jruby. I just generate a jar and stick it into our org.jruby plugin. Be sure to increment the plugin.xml version number so it will override any previous versions. About

Re: [RDT-Dev] RDT Continuous Build Server

2006-12-09 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Christopher Williams wrote: Markus, Can you set up our continuous build server to email the offending contributors when the build breaks? The build list is activated again, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if not yet done. Also my work firewall blocks any HTTP requests for ports other

Re: [RDT-Dev] RDT Continuous Build Server

2006-12-07 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Christopher Williams wrote: Markus, Can you set up our continuous build server to email the offending contributors when the build breaks? Since we moved to subversion I did not look into this. In CVS we had maintained the CVSROOT/users file for this purpose. I do not know what is necessary

Re: [RDT-Dev] [PATCH] Open debug perspective on suspend

2006-11-01 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote: Markus Barchfeld wrote: The debugger will need some serious refactoring. Currently I work on the integration of ruby-debug which will probably make the debugger 2,5 times faster (e.g. wait 10 instead of 25 secs until reaching a breakpoint). Unfortunately

Re: [RDT-Dev] [PATCH] Open debug perspective on suspend

2006-10-31 Thread Markus Barchfeld
It seems that RDT doesn't open debug perspective on suspend such as breakpoints (JDT does). I read LaunchSuspendTrigger#handleDebugEvents() and created a patch for this problem. Please check it. Small, but effective. Excellent. Thanks, it is committed. The debugger will need some

Re: [RDT-Dev] Enabling email notification on ticket changes?

2006-08-28 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Mirko Stocker wrote: On Sunday 27 August 2006 06:02, zdennis wrote: I belive this was turned on at one time, but then it was disabled. I cannot remember why, but I can add this back in if folks want it. Where should the emails be sent? We have our Trac configured to notify the

Re: [RDT-Dev] Broken Overview and Tutorial

2006-08-13 Thread Markus Barchfeld
designker wrote: Okay all fixed now. Please apply debug.ui.patch.txt to rdt.debug.ui. This will remove the cheatcheet extension from the plugin.xml. You still need to delete the unneeded cheetsheet files from rdt.debug.ui. Without this the cheetsheet appears twice. Now apply rdt.patch.txt

Re: [RDT-Dev] Broken Overview and Tutorial

2006-08-02 Thread Markus Barchfeld
designker wrote: Hi, After messing around with org.rubypeople.rdt I have fixed the RDT Overview and Tutorial that no longer appeared as of RDT 0.8. I am not 100% sure I have fixed it all as the org.rubypeople.rdt.doc.user that is in the trunk has an empty HTML folder and I think that is

Re: [RDT-Dev] Introductions

2006-06-20 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Hi all! This is also a subtle way of mentioning to list members that I've switched the RDT codebase over to SVN from CVS on Sourceforge. Markus is also switching the continuous build server to compile against Eclipse 3.2. The continuous build is using subversion now. Eclipse version is

Re: [RDT-Dev] Releasing 0.7.0

2006-01-17 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Perhaps, but since we follow Ruby we need to make this additional ID feature turned on as an extension of some sort. As a quick fix I could have useless statment visitor check for a set system property? Anyname like 'jruby.less.warnings'? If this is set, then we will not throw a warning

Re: [RDT-Dev] Releasing 0.7.0

2006-01-15 Thread Markus Barchfeld
Christopher Williams wrote: Markus and all, What are the fixes or other steps that everyone thinks we need to complete before releasing a true 0.7.0 release? The Radrails guys have been patiently waiting for the release to do their own. I think we should push to do what we can to get it