Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Markus Barchfeld
> > BTW on which version of debug.rb is eclipseDebug.rb built on? According to: > >http://rubyeclipse.mktec.com/cgi-bin/trac.py/ticket/225 > > it seems quite old. There was not merged fix in debug.rb which was five > years old. > > That might be. I started on eclipseDebug.rb in 2002 on sta

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Martin Krauskopf
Markus Barchfeld wrote: >> Any preferences for the name of the project? "Remote Debug"? Or "Remote >> Debug Commons"? :) >> > I think "commons" is important, so "Remote Debug Commons" or "Debugger > Commons" sounds good. >> BTW is anybody actively working on FTC_ClassicDebuggerCommunicationTes

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Markus Barchfeld
> Any preferences for the name of the project? "Remote Debug"? Or "Remote > Debug Commons"? :) > I think "commons" is important, so "Remote Debug Commons" or "Debugger Commons" sounds good. > BTW is anybody actively working on FTC_ClassicDebuggerCommunicationTest? > I've noticed that always

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-26 Thread Martin Krauskopf
Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote: > Martin Krauskopf wrote: >> Yes, this is what I'm beginning to work on. It will be bunch of small >> -Test::Unit::TestCase-s which will be testing every corner of the >> protocol, runnable against whatever Ruby implementation. So it will as >> well catch every i

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-25 Thread Werner Schuster (murphee)
Martin Krauskopf wrote: > Thomas E Enebo wrote: > >> I would write this specification using unit/test API compatiable tests. >> This could still serve as a specification and plug straight into our >> testing framework (we (JRuby) are moving to miniunit/test/unit tests). >> Having small pass/fail

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-23 Thread Martin Krauskopf
Thomas E Enebo wrote: > I wanted to comment on the referenced paragraph...More below... > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Martin Krauskopf defenestrated me: >> With what to start? I could start with writing test in Ruby. Those tests >> would ensure that backends correspond closely to the "specification".

Re: [RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-22 Thread Thomas E Enebo
I wanted to comment on the referenced paragraph...More below... On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Martin Krauskopf defenestrated me: > > With what to start? I could start with writing test in Ruby. Those tests > would ensure that backends correspond closely to the "specification". > Since there is not yet a

[RDT-Dev] Remote Debug project

2007-01-22 Thread Martin Krauskopf
Hi, I would like to start talk about the topic on this list. We exchanged few emails about it with Chris, Markus and murphee and I see more and more people invoked, like Mirko. I wasn't aware that so much developers contribute just to the debugger. So as we discussed it would be great if debuggin