Wow, so, this thread is getting silly. It's just going to take some time for
patches to get approved unless they're clearly ready. Anyway, there's some more
feedback to come on comments here.
Tying to snip where possible.
On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Trans wrote:
> On Dec 10, 1:55 am, Eric Hode
On Dec 11, 2010, at 13:07 , Trans wrote:
> "tough shit" is how you put it on another topic.
erikh (erik hollensbe) != drbrain (eric hodel)
___
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
ht
First let me thank everyone who responded. Some of the comments were
very helpful and I will take stock of them in the future. I may yet
respond to some of them, but I would like to respond to Eric now,
since he took the time to make a point by point reanalysis of our
conversations. Just to clear,
On Dec 8, 2010, at 15:12, Trans wrote:
> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
> some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
> developers. But in this process, rather then feel a part
> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
> some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
> developers. But in this process, rather then feel a part of a
> community effort, even if only
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Trans wrote:
>> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
>> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
>> some functionality to the code base that would be use
On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Trans wrote:
> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
> some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
> developers. But in this process, rather then feel a p
On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Trans wrote:
> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
> some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
> developers. But in this process, rather then feel a
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Trans wrote:
> I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
> patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
> some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
> developers. But in this process, rather then feel
I would like some constructive appraisal. I recently offered some
patches to RubyGems. I feel I was making my best effort to contribute
some functionality to the code base that would be useful to
developers. But in this process, rather then feel a part of a
community effort, even if only a minor pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
