On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:29 PM, John Barnette wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Tom Werner wrote:
>>
>> This command would look in each source, in order, for a gem with the
>> 'mojombo' namespace and the 'jekyll' name. The main benefit here is that the
>> gem would be installed as just 'je
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:45, Tom Werner wrote:
We've been thinking a lot about our gem strategy here at GitHub, and
after a
discussion with Yehuda a number of weeks ago, I'd like to propose a
possible
solution that describes how GitHub gems and Rubyforge gems can live
together
in peace.
I'
Hey Tom,
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Tom Werner wrote:
This command would look in each source, in order, for a gem with the
'mojombo' namespace and the 'jekyll' name. The main benefit here is
that the
gem would be installed as just 'jekyll' instead of 'mojombo-jekyll'
as in
the current sit
We've been thinking a lot about our gem strategy here at GitHub, and after a
discussion with Yehuda a number of weeks ago, I'd like to propose a possible
solution that describes how GitHub gems and Rubyforge gems can live together
in peace.
The solution is to add the concept of namespaces to the ge
