Re: [Rails-core] Break out testing library from ActiveSupport?

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 4:00 PM, Jaco Pretorius wrote: > On Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 4:08:34 PM UTC-5, Steve Klabnik wrote: > Minitest is already in the standard library, so you're not really > adding or removing any meaningful dependence. > I just found this thread

Re: [Rails-core] Break out testing library from ActiveSupport?

I just found this thread after noticing the same dependency today and looking for a way to potentially remove this. I don't quite see a dependency on minitest in the 'standard library' (by which I assume you mean the Rails gem itself). https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/rails.gemspec

[Rails-core] Break out testing library from ActiveSupport?

I followed down the path of why my app was bringing in 'minitest' in production and noticed that activesupport has a dependency on minitest. I wondered why it wasn't a development dependency and then it dawned on me that it was necessary for ActiveSupport::TestCase. What does the core team

Re: [Rails-core] Break out testing library from ActiveSupport?

Hi Brian, I think to we start to consider doing this we will need a stronger reason than load less code for production Rails apps. AFAIK, we don't require active_support/test_case in production environment so we are not loading minitest at production too. If that is the case we should fix this,

Re: [Rails-core] Break out testing library from ActiveSupport?

Minitest is already in the standard library, so you're not really adding or removing any meaningful dependence. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email