Oops. Hit sent before completing the email.
Anyway, I was thinking it may be a good idea to take keyword arguments to
precise control the amount of indentation/tab vs space, etc to override the
auto-detection, in the rare cases where it is needed.
For example, when processing an indented
+1 to what Matthew said
If we are switching the use case of the method to stripping indentation, I
wonder if we should just call it `outdent`.
By default it could auto detect the indentation like it does now, but there
were a couple of times I was processing strings with known indentation that
I
> The squiggly-heredoc operator can't be applied to an already existing string.
> That is the only case were you still need strip_heredoc, so unless we add a
> way to strip heredocs from an already existent string object to Ruby we can't
> deprecated it.
How about we rename it to something
The squiggly-heredoc operator can't be applied to an already existing
string. That is the only case were you still need strip_heredoc, so unless
we add a way to strip heredocs from an already existent string object to
Ruby we can't deprecated it.
See
+1 too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
+1 for deprecating.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
The new squiggly-heredoc syntax is available since Ruby 2.3, which does the
same thing as "strip_heredoc" method. I was going to submit a documentation
change to mention the new Ruby syntax, but now I'm doubting if there is any
good use case for the method, except for backwards compatibility.
