> The "proxy" is being made this way so that you can simply pass it to
> most of enumerable methods - i.e. "function iterator(value, index)
Yeah I figured it out shortly after I posted that last message, as you
might have guessed I've never used a named function for an iterator
before, but it s
The "proxy" is being made this way so that you can simply pass it to
most of enumerable methods - i.e. "function iterator(value, index)
{ return }".
You can of course call it on its own.
- kangax
On May 6, 9:57 am, "Justin Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you explain this proxy method
I'm pretty sure Array.splice is a native method, there is
documentation on the w3 schools site.
http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_splice.asp
--
Matt Foster
Ajax Engineer
Nth Penguin, LLC
http://www.nthpenguin.com
On May 5, 11:59 pm, "Justin Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O
Can you explain this proxy method a bit more for me...
> Regarding your snippet, what about something like:
>
> var SomeClass = Class.create({
> initialize: function(index) {
> this.index = index;
> }
> })
>
> // it might sense to use iterator-like "proxy" for filtering
> SomeClass.c
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:04 PM, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Justin,
> there's no need to "wrap" array with $A. Array.prototype is already
Thanks for the tip, I'm paranoid. IE has scarred me. I'll try to
remember that. I usually initialize with this.foo = $A(), so that's
what I was doi
Justin,
there's no need to "wrap" array with $A. Array.prototype is already
extended with Enumerable.
I'm not sure why you would want to "compact" a result in first
example:
[1,2,3,4,5].findAll(function(n) {
return n != 4;
});
// [1,2,3,5]
// or
[1,2,3,4,5].reject(function(n) {
return n ==
