On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 2:12:27 PM UTC-4, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
> Read the docs I linked you to, and if that doesn't explain it, then ask
> the author of the code you're extending. It's possible that it is passing a
> reference to a proc or lambda, but I have not seen that exact code
Read the docs I linked you to, and if that doesn't explain it, then ask the
author of the code you're extending. It's possible that it is passing a
reference to a proc or lambda, but I have not seen that exact code before, so I
can only guess.
Walter
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 2:04 PM, fugee ohu
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 11:44:54 AM UTC-4, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:20 AM, fugee ohu
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually the first thing is see when I visit that link is the use of
> validate without the s
>
> The validate method is used along
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:20 AM, fugee ohu wrote:
>
> Actually the first thing is see when I visit that link is the use of validate
> without the s
The validate method is used along with a custom validator method. The validates
method is "built in" and uses a DSL to specify
What have you tried so far in debugging this?
Have you used any debugger like pry to see what happens when you rune the
code?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
5 matches
Mail list logo