Re: [rules-dev] Drools and Java 1.8

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 20 August 2014 18:03, Mark Proctor wrote: > At some point yes, we don't have any timelines for it yet. > > Relate to this, our current priority is a new low level executable model, > that facilities java8 written fluent rules. > http://blog.athico.com/2014/07/drools-executable-model.html I'll

Re: [rules-dev] Drools and Java 1.8

2014-08-20 Thread Mark Proctor
At some point yes, we don’t have any timelines for it yet. Relate to this, our current priority is a new low level executable model, that facilities java8 written fluent rules. http://blog.athico.com/2014/07/drools-executable-model.html Mark On 20 Aug 2014, at 12:48, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > Th

[rules-dev] Drools and Java 1.8

2014-08-20 Thread Wolfgang Laun
The error message from 6.1.0.CR1 is clear: "Unable to resolve class 'dynop.Main$$Lambda$1/20003005" in ClassFieldAccessorCache. Is the support for Java lambdas on the Drools roadmap? Regards Wolfgng ___ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org h