+1 for vertical partitioning (planner, guvnor/workbench, expert+fusion)
-1 for experience-based partitioning. I believe this will cause
fragmentation and confusion.
On 14-05-14 07:10, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> IIRC, absolute beginners' question aren't making the list
> inhomogeneous. (Poor netiquet
IIRC, absolute beginners' question aren't making the list
inhomogeneous. (Poor netiquette is not necessarily a Drools beginner's
symptom.) I think that separating vertically (planner,
guvnor/workbench, expert+fusion) is the way to go.
This is also (roughly) the way (most) Qs are answered: by Geoff
I’ve asked geoffrey to setup a separate mailing list for planner, and to write
on the optaplanner website what questions should not be asked on the Drools
lists.
We can setup an additional two new google groups for Drools. One for expert DRL
questions and one for Workbench questions. Or maybe w
Hi Wolfgang,
You're right.
Some insight on the problem (and why it's hasn't been fixed yet):
1) Most of OptaPlanner's questions are actually asked on StackOverflow
these days
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/optaplanner
because optaplanner.org links that too:
http://www.optaplann
Hi Team,
the amount of (what is) noise (to me) on the users list has steadily
increased over time. Several distinct topics appear (to me) to be
bunched together needlessly, and I'm beginning to use interest in this
list. IIRC, there was some talk several months ago, that things like
planner, JBPM
