[rules-users] M2 release DSL support is partial?

2007-05-15 Thread Sikkandar Nawabjan
Mark, The DSL is enabled completely or partially(engine level). (ie) can we use the Eclipse(plugin) to create and test dsl? since we tested M2 with eclipse and it seems the Rules are not = acticvated when using DSL. Our rules are very complex and we required such a Guy support to =

[rules-users] repeat result

2007-05-15 Thread fakhfakh ismail
hello, first sorry for my bad english, is there a soluttion to avoid the repeating result? when I execute my programme I get solution repeat more then one: alain ne peut pas executer cette activite alain ne peut pas executer cette activite alain ne peut pas executer cette activite alain ne peut

Re: [rules-users] Using the Rule Flow Builder GUI

2007-05-15 Thread Shahad Ahmed
Cool. I was showing the ruleflow and BRMS to some of the guys at work yesterday, and the fact that the ruleflow was not available in the BRMS was one of things they all raised. Apologies for not checking the JIRA first - that's what I get for replying to emails when I really should be in bed.

Re: [rules-users] M2 release DSL support is partial?

2007-05-15 Thread Kris Verlaenen
The DSL support in the eclipse plugin has changed slightly: - DSL rules are now considered as a special format. The extension of DSL rules should thus no longer be .drl but .dslr - A dedicated editor for .dslr files has been created, which allows you to see a preview of the translation of

Re: [rules-users] From v 3.0.6 to 4.0.0

2007-05-15 Thread Edson Tirelli
Chris Version 3.0.x prevents by default a single fact from matching multiple patterns. For a couple of reasons we had to change the default in 4.0 to allow a single fact to match multiple patterns. If you don't want this to happen, you can use one of the following approaches: * Change the

Re: [rules-users] From v 3.0.6 to 4.0.0

2007-05-15 Thread Mark Proctor
I can't remember them, but at the time we where shown some use cases that worked that way. Also we have the problem that our engine works differently to other engines, so we decided align with the industry norm and allow people to choose what they want. Oh and identity removal has a slight

Re: [rules-users] From v 3.0.6 to 4.0.0

2007-05-15 Thread Edson Tirelli
Yes, two main reasons were the alignment with industry products and the small perf impact. []s Edson 2007/5/15, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can't remember them, but at the time we where shown some use cases that worked that way. Also we have the problem that our engine works

Re: RE : Re: [rules-users] declare variable

2007-05-15 Thread Scott Reed
Check the Drools documentation section 6.2.2.1. Globals. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users