Hi,
I am inserting message(fileName, fromQ,toQ,transType) to WorkingMemory.
fileName as ABC-834-test-100.edi
I am inserting 3 instances of TrasactionVO's to workingmemory as follows:
TransactionVO transVO = new TransactionVO(ABC-834, ABC.834.EDI,
ABC.834.XML, 834);
TransactionVO
Hi,
i could not connect to the anonymous svn with subclipse plugin?
RA layer request failed
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/labs/jbossrules/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND of '/labs/jbossrules/trunk': could not connect to server
(http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com)
Cheers
Markus
Hi,
your rules represent the following Java Code (the system.out are just
to see the result of matches)
public static void main(String[] args)
{
// You're rule
System.out.println(ABC-834.matches(ABC-834-test-100.edi));
//false
I think this has already been answered... a few times.
Both 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 where bad releases, poor QA, so we rolled back to
4.0.4.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mmquelo massi
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 5:52 AM
To: Rules Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry guys,
but I can't understand why u released 4.0.5 a couple of weeks ago, then u
suddenly released
a brand new 4.0.6 release few days ago (which I promptly downloaded) and
now u put back again
the 4.0.4???
*Why???*
What is the stable one
Does the svn is working?? Should we
Hi,
Any help to the problem below is much appreciated : )
Here is the problem:
I have a set of rules. Intially these rules are evaluated individually.
However, now there is a need to fire these rules in groups which is similar
to a logic gate AND or OR. And, the results of this groups of rules
Yes I'm very sorry about this, we have problems with our QA person -
very embarassing. We've rolled back to 4.0.4 and Edson and myself will
take care of QA for 4.0.7 which we will release on monday, once I'm
recovered from my flu.
Mark
mmquelo massi wrote:
Sorry guys,
but I can't
Hi Everyone!
We've been using the engine for quite a while in the project (a web
app) and now we're switching from Tomcat to Jetty in our local dev
environments. This change triggered a strange error when it compiles
the rules (both with the eclipse and janino dialects).
I'm using eclipse
hi,
I have no problem for this kind of rule :
rule Primitive support
when
$c : Cheese( price 10 )
then
$c.setPrice( 10 )
end
but I would like to know what is the decision table for this small rule
rule Primitive support
when
$c : Cheese( $price : price )
then
$c.setPrice(
In the What's New? Section of the Drools 4.0 documentation there is a
reference in 1.1.2 to a Rules Engine Agent for hot deployment and BRMS
integration. This would be ideal for the application I am currently
developing. However, this is the only mention of this agent anywhere in the
Brian,
I'm guessing that you mean the RuleAgent Class. The Javadoc on this
class gives more info.
Code sample (assuming that you have the BRMS setup as per the doc).
You'll need to change to whatever settings are appropriate for your BRMS.
Properties prop = new Properties();
11 matches
Mail list logo