RE: [rules-users] controling rule execution

2008-10-31 Thread Joe White
Another way to do it is a combination of salience and retraction. The parent rule would have a higher salience value and then retract the facts in its consequence Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Barton Sent: Thursday, October 30,

Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution

2008-10-31 Thread techy
Thanks Greg. child rule should be reactivated if parent's conditions for some other fact are false. this should happen for each fact. Parent's condition should decide whether child rule should be executed or not for each fact. If parent's conditions are true, then don't execute child rule and

Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution

2008-10-31 Thread Greg Barton
You may consider the other suggestion of retracting the fact(s) that would trigger the child rule. It's the more natural way of going about it. What's driving this design choice? --- On Fri, 10/31/08, techy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: techy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [rules-users]

[rules-users] EDT dependency -- transitive dependencies broken from 4.07 to 5?

2008-10-31 Thread Andrew Waterman
Hi Everyone, I've seen this issue in the archives, but I haven't seen anyone address it in regards to an upgrade from 4.07 to 5MR2. Basically, I have a set of java dialect drl files that compile properly in 4.07 and are usable, but when I simply modify my maven build to use the 5MR2

Re: [rules-users] EDT dependency -- transitive dependencies broken from 4.07 to 5?

2008-10-31 Thread Ingomar Otter
Hi Andrew, I've seen this in 4.0.7 as well. There is a dependency from drools-compiler to either Eclipse JDT or Janino for compilation, depending on what compiler you choose. JDT is default by now. Both compilers are supplied with 5M2 bin-dist, see lib/janino.jar and

Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution

2008-10-31 Thread techy
Thanks Greg and Joe. I think i should have mentioned this before. I can also have other parent rule node in the tree structure which tests against same fact. Each parent rule node should only control its child rule nodes, but not other parent rule node and child rule node. If I do retract,

Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution

2008-10-31 Thread Greg Barton
Yep, it would affect all rules that could match on those facts. You could have a control fact per child rule that could potentially match. The child rule would include an existence check for that fact in it's conditions. The parent rule would retract the fact to prevent the child rule from

[rules-users] loading rules dynamically

2008-10-31 Thread techy
Hi, If the rules,conditions,consequences have to be loaded from the database. I can think of following two approach. what would be right approach( I will have upto 1200 rules in the db) 1. Programmatically inject the rules into rule engine using drools API. 2. Read the rules from the database