Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow / Declarative process definition

2010-03-03 Thread Jaroslav Pullmann
Hello Kris, thank you for your detailed response, this makes Drols Flow an even more appealing solution for data-driven processes. Yes, if you execute your processes in advanced mode, we are translating procedural constructs like sequence into a more declarative rule like the one you

Re: [rules-users] from keyword does not actually check types?

2010-03-03 Thread Simon Thum
Edson Tirelli wrote: Hi Jevon, That is a discussion we had for some time (whether from should check return type or not for matching purposes). The only reason it was not implemented so far is that it would possibly cause silent failures. Example: Person( name == bob ) from $people

Re: [rules-users] from keyword does not actually check types?

2010-03-03 Thread Swindells, Thomas
I'm not convinced about the silent failure argument as I don't see how it is any different from the silent failure you get if the type doesn't exist in the 'main' knowledge base - this is probably because the way I conceptualize the from keyword is to say don't use the normal knowledge base but

[rules-users] Any news on Drools 5.1

2010-03-03 Thread Chuck Irvine
I am planning on diving into a Drools based workflow related project pretty soon and have kind of been waiting for 5.1 to come out (or maybe the next milestone release). Any news on 5.1 availability? Thanks -Chuck ___ rules-users mailing list

Re: [rules-users] Any news on Drools 5.1

2010-03-03 Thread Mark Proctor
On 03/03/2010 15:49, Chuck Irvine wrote: I am planning on diving into a Drools based workflow related project pretty soon and have kind of been waiting for 5.1 to come out (or maybe the next milestone release). Any news on 5.1 availability? Thanks -Chuck Edson has just merged the Rete

Re: [rules-users] Any news on Drools 5.1

2010-03-03 Thread Dale Wyttenbach
Something that has been puzzling me for a while is how Hudson is able to run the drools-persistence-jpa unit tests, because I can't without modifying the pom. From searching the drools user archives, I can see it's an old problem (The Eclipse JDT Core jar is not in the classpath) but I never saw a

[rules-users] java.lang.NoSuchFieldError during D5 upgrade

2010-03-03 Thread Agrawal, Swapnil
Hi I am upgrading our age old D3 rules system to D5. Got all the jars, made the code changes and resolved errors as I faced them. I am stuck on one which looks like an antlr error but don't know how it can be solved. Error I get is: Exception in thread pool-2-thread-1

Re: [rules-users] Drools Roadmap - Planned Release 5.1 release date

2010-03-03 Thread Rohit Rai
Bump! Bump! Any updates on 5.1M2? -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Roadmap-Planned-Release-5-1-release-date-tp60252p427859.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list