[rules-users] Use of Otherwise in converted decision table in Guvnor.

2012-08-30 Thread Manasi
Hi, 1) I am using new feature of Guvnor 5.4 i.e converting from decision table in excel format to Guvnor web Decision Table format. After excel decision table is converted to Guvnor web Decision table format ,I am not able to use *'Otherwise'* feature for rows in guvnor decision table. If Guvnor

Re: [rules-users] rules not being reconsidered after modify

2012-08-30 Thread Vincent LEGENDRE
Hi, You must make a difference between "facts" and other objects (that you can get by "bindings"). "facts" are the objects inserted in the working memory. Only those objects can be matched directly in LHS. Other entities can be accessed by using attributes (of facts) bindings or "from" constr

[rules-users] Best model for planning?

2012-08-30 Thread mvermand
Hi, I'd like some advice on how to make my model. I need to plan maintenance-schedules for - let's say - airplanes. Constraints are: - planes are only at given moments available for maintenance (when not in the air ;-) - maintenance of a planes requires a number of techniciens (with specific skil

[rules-users] rules not being reconsidered after modify

2012-08-30 Thread wichtl
Hi, I'm new to using Drools and its probably just a problem with me understanding how this works, but I've tried everything i can think of, so I come to you in hope for some help! I have a set of rules which modify an object in the RHS and another set of Rules that should be fireing after the mod

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Edson Tirelli
Hi Pamela, Posting to the list is fine, but you may also want to post it here: http://jobs.athico.com/post-direct It shows up on the Drools blog: http://blog.athico.com/ Edson On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Pamela McGrath wrote: > I assure you I am not going to start sending a

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Edson Tirelli
Please all, one of the goals of this e-mail list is to connect people and job offers are a good thing for the community as a whole. Lets not make an issue out of it. Thank you, Edson On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Vincent LEGENDRE < vincent.legen...@eurodecision.com> wrote: > But it m

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Pamela McGrath
I assure you I am not going to start sending a lot of Junk mail proposing job opportunities, this is the first Jboss/Java/ Drools job opening I have come across and I was having a hard time finding someone who had all of the qualifications needed for the job. From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jbo

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Pamela McGrath
Hi Tom, The Job is in Baltimore Maryland for US Citizens. I apologize for not stating that in the job description. From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Tom Eugelink Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 5:40 AM To: rules-users@lists.jboss

Re: [rules-users] unable to access the rules in the guvnor repository

2012-08-30 Thread shyam_prakash
Probably its not picking the changeset.xml. Try pasting the changeset.xml within java code and see what happens. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/unable-to-access-the-rules-in-the-guvnor-repository-tp4019436p4019457.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailin

[rules-users] enabled attribute behavior (possible bug?)

2012-08-30 Thread Philipp Herzig
Dear developers, I've stumbled over another nullpointer exception when using the enabled attribute in conjunction with deleting and adding rules to the kbase. For my test I have only one simple rule rule 'newUser' enabled(!RuleEngineConf.LOAD) when $evt : EventObject(type=='new_user') from

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Vincent LEGENDRE
But it may be a horse anyway ... Let's say Anatolia is this list, and the horse the initial post. According to all the jobs available for that kind of profile around the world, it can be the first of a very long bunch of junk mails proposing a job that anyone here can find within a week ... -

Re: [rules-users] Timer Cron reevaluating same facts again and gain

2012-08-30 Thread rvkhakhkhar1
Thanks buddy. Fully got the concept. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Timer-Cron-re-evaluating-same-facts-again-and-again-tp4019422p4019444.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Tom Eugelink
Hey, I'm already impressed with myself that I knew MI is Michigan (I did use google to find out how that is spelled though, initially had a T in there). :-) Tom On 2012-08-30 11:53, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > Well, it's certainly not Troy in Anatolia ;-) > > > On 30/08/2012, Tom Eugelink wrote: >>

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Well, it's certainly not Troy in Anatolia ;-) On 30/08/2012, Tom Eugelink wrote: > I assume this is somewhere in the US? MI is Michigan, right? (There are non > Americans on this list as well ;-) > > Tom > > > On 2012-08-29 18:00, Pamela McGrath wrote: >> >> I have a job opportunity available fo

Re: [rules-users] Timer Cron reevaluating same facts again and gain

2012-08-30 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 30/08/2012, rvkhakhkhar1 wrote: > That means, a rule with timer don't remeber for which facts it has executed > consequence part previosly and when its time arrive it just execute > consequence part on available facts. A rule never "remembers" anything, with or without timers. A rule with a t

Re: [rules-users] Job Opportunity - Jboss, Drools, Java Architecht/Consultant

2012-08-30 Thread Tom Eugelink
I assume this is somewhere in the US? MI is Michigan, right? (There are non Americans on this list as well ;-) Tom On 2012-08-29 18:00, Pamela McGrath wrote: I have a job opportunity available for a technology professional experienced in java, jboss and drools. This is a great opportunity

Re: [rules-users] Timer Cron reevaluating same facts again and gain

2012-08-30 Thread rvkhakhkhar1
That means, a rule with timer don't remeber for which facts it has executed consequence part previosly and when its time arrive it just execute consequence part on available facts. I checked using AgendaListner, just after rule fire(afterActivationFired) isActive becomes false, but for the next tim