that is leaking.
Jason Smith
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org]
On Behalf Of Oliver Liu [liuyy2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:44 PM
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users
a good weekend, and try not to work on this stuff.
Jason Smith
Software Engineer
InfoTrust Group, Inc.
500 Discovery Parkway, Suite 200
Superior, CO 80027
Office 303-627-6571
Fax 303-666-6711
Email jsm...@infotrustgroup.commailto:jsm...@infotrustgroup.com
WEB www.infotrustgroup.comhttp
I would like to recall the previous message... please ignore. Big oops!
Jason Smith
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org]
On Behalf Of Paul R. [reverselo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Rules
!
Jason Smith
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org]
On Behalf Of Pavel Tavoda [pavel.tav...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 1:30 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] AGE problem
Try to do
));
if((evt.getNewValue() == null evt.getOldValue() != null) ||
!evt.getNewValue().equals(evt.getOldValue()))
{
session.update(factHandle, fact);
}
}
}
Jason Smith
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org
Here is a twist.
If I call update($fact) explicitly in the rule, the rule is NOT called twice.
Can someone point me to the code used by update($fact)? Maybe I can figure
out what I did wrong to cause the rule to fire incorrectly a second time.
Jason Smith
= object;
}
public Object execute(ReteooWorkingMemory session) {
session.update( handle,
object );
return null;
}
public String toString() {
return session.update( + handle + , + object + );;
}
}
Jason Smith
(what little I could find on this particular subject) that the property event
was triggered before the actual value changed.
Jason Smith
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Smith [jsm
*not* seeing this behaviour?
Is anyone successfully using the PropertyChangeSupport mechanism without
explicit calls to update()???
Jason Smith
From: Jason Smith
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:36 PM
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Rule runs twice without
;
}
}
}
}
Please read around the formatting. Can someone verify if this is a correct
fix, and if it should be applied to the codebase? It seems to work for me. It
does not break any unit tests in drools-core 5.0.1 either.
Jason Smith
Software Engineer
InfoTrust Group, Inc.
500
10 matches
Mail list logo
