[rules-users] REST API: Retrieving package versions as an Atom Feed Returns Unexpected Data

Hello, I tried to explore Guvnor's REST API, particularly interested in retrieving package versions and binary with a given package version. But I could not get the result as the given example in chapter 9.2.3.2.5 and Example 9.10: Guvnor version: 5.4.0.Final Repository: sample repository

Re: [rules-users] Scaling to large numbers of rules

Adam, There are several ways to deal with large number of rules. For example, instead of re-compiling the whole rule set every time, you could just compile the rules that are updated/new, then adding them to the existing KnowledgeBase instance. Drools is capable to handle such usage, even

RE: [rules-users] jdk 1.6 support

Jeffery, We are definitely going to run the Drools 5, only the compiler and engine part, under jdk 1.6 since this is going to be the version for our production environment. We just integrated the pre-release Drools 5.0 for the new project under development; so far no issues for our usage.

[rules-users] Package - PackageDescr

I knew it would be an odd question, but I just have to ask just in case: Is there a tool available to convert/extract a PackageDescr out of an instance of Package? My final goal is to use DrlDumper to obtain DRL, or to use XmlDumper to get XML representations of the package. Thanks, -Ming

RE: [rules-users] rules precompilation

Sergey, I am using precompiled rules. Serializing instances of org.drools.rule.Package works for me. Thanks, -Ming -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manukyan, Sergey Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 12:29 PM To: Rules Users List

RE: [rules-users] rules precompilation

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jin, Ming Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:50 PM To: Rules Users List Subject: RE: [rules-users] rules precompilation Sergey, I am using precompiled rules. Serializing instances of org.drools.rule.Package works for me. Thanks, -Ming -Original Message- From

[rules-users] Executing Rules in Sequential Mode

My rules engine test showed virtually no difference between Rete and Sequential execution modes: 3.44s for Rete while 3.50s for Sequential. Those are the average timing from several runs, each with 1,000 rule execution calls. Since I do not have a controlled environment, the difference seems

[rules-users] Documentation Error?

There might be an error in Reference Manual, Chapter 10, Example 810..3: RuleExecutionSet ruleExecutionSet = ruleExecutionSetProvider.createRuleExecutionSet( reader, properties ); The variable reader was not defined in the sample, should it be drlReader instead? Also in the paragraph above,

[rules-users] Why does Drools' RuleBase.addPackage() Behave This Way?

I am benchmarking Drools 4.0 and received excellent results in rule execution. With our non-optimized test rule set and data, Drools out performed ILOG/JRules by quite a bit. Congratulations to Drools' team for a job well done. I encountered a strange behavior when trying to test the

RE: [rules-users] Why does Drools' RuleBase.addPackage() Behave ThisWay?

rule set and data - just trying to understand so I can compare apples to apples. Mark Jin, Ming wrote: I am benchmarking Drools 4.0 and received excellent results in rule execution. With our non-optimized test rule set and data, Drools out performed ILOG

[rules-users] Dynamic Packaging using Drools 4.0.0

I am facing a tough problem requiring some abnormal solutions: The requirements calls for million rules (they all think about that at the beginning), so we are thinking about packaging rules on the fly during execution instead caching all the rules in the rules engine. All the rules will be