I knew I was on dangerous ground :)
Thanks Wolfgang for tying up my loose end.
At least you didn't change it to employesalary.color == director which
would have confused me ;)
On 23 August 2012 19:01, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 August 2012 17:08, Michael Anstis
From where did the repository file you are importing originate? Some more
information is going to be needed for anybody to be able to provide any
assistance.
sent on the move
On 22 Aug 2012 16:38, Nancy Henggeler nancy.hengge...@fblfinancial.com
wrote:
Need assistance: Guvnor 5.3.1 throws
Thanks Esteban, I'd forgotten about your work on this :(
On 17 August 2012 15:33, Esteban Aliverti esteban.alive...@gmail.comwrote:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/drools-guvnor-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e1802
Best Regards,
Hi Jason,
That is not supported at present, but is a work-around (that is consistent
with enum definitions).
Please raise another JIRA and I'll look into that too.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 17 August 2012 02:40, jasonxzhong jason.zh...@ellucian.com wrote:
Can @{KeyName} be annotated with
Eh?
Can you please explain your requirement a bit more.
On 17 August 2012 03:09, jasonxzhong jason.zh...@ellucian.com wrote:
Is there a way to specify enumeration values or functions for variables in
DSL definition?
Thanks,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
This might be helpful:
http://blog.athico.com/2011/01/configuring-multiple-guvnor-instances.html
On 17 August 2012 03:34, jasonxzhong jason.zh...@ellucian.com wrote:
Has anyone tried to set up Guvnor in a clustered configuration, i.e. using
more than one instance of Guvnor for high
You don't need an separate BRL Fragment for each line in the DRL. Why not
define a BRL Fragment for this:-
data : RuleData( controlCode == 123, term = TemplateKey )
You'll then have a column in which to enter the value of term. If the
cell the fragment will not be included in the rule.
With
This is a limitation of the current import process.
A Condition\Pattern spanning multiple condition columns becomes a single
free-format DRL BRL Fragment column. BRL Fragments are only included if
all value place holders contain a value.
In the future we would like to improve the import to build
No this is not possible.
Separating Template from Data though would make a good feature.
I've raised a JIRA for it here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1929
With kind regards,
Mike
On 16 August 2012 18:08, dunnlow dunn...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have template data that has several
BTW, to clarify this is a Guvnor enhancement.
I assume you was meaning Guvnor (...Create New - New Rule Template).
Drools Expert Templates can already be used with different data-sets.
On 16 August 2012 20:44, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
No this is not possible
This is a known limitation: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1799
With kind regards,
Mike
On 16 August 2012 16:55, jasonxzhong jason.zh...@ellucian.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to use DSL terms in BRL fragment to
construct a
column in a guided decision table.
I have the
Hi,
If you add a BRL Fragment column and add Free form drl to that you can
use the @{keyname} notation (I just tried and it works fine).
BTW, it was a design decision to have a boolean checkbox for BRL Fragments
that contain no template keys. The thought being a user might not want the
fragment
Hi,
Unfortunately it is not possible to associate a data-type with a @{key}
field at present.
In order to do so we'd need to parse the DRL text to determine the
Fact\Field to which the key relates (if indeed any). This is a significant
enhancement.
Being able to set a default value for BRL
Personally, I don't find the user list high volume.
Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:-
- users: newbie type stuff
- dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just
implementation)
My 2c.
On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy sala...@gmail.com wrote:
Done (for next release).
On 14 August 2012 22:11, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 14 Aug 2012, at 19:29, dme1 meh...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. With the 5.4 plugin I do not see the
Guided Rule option, just the Rule Resource, so the screeshot seems
Hi,
This is somewhere between a bug and an enhancement:
Currently the Template Editor does not support template keys for Metadata
or Attributes; i.e. your requirement is an enhancement.
You can however provide literal values formatted as template keys (e.g.
@{xx} as you have discovered); i.e.
Hi,
I assume you mean Drools DRL (DSL is something different and none of your
examples suggest use of this so far).
How about checking for the absence of the Double instead of it being null:-
when
$product : Product( )
not Double( ) from bookingService.getQty( $product )
I've not tried
The use of Otherwise is not supported in XLS at the moment.
There is an open JIRA to address this:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1278
With kind regards,
Mike
On 15 August 2012 21:16, dme1 meh...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How do I use otherwise in Decision Tables created using Eclipse
Any particular place you get the NPE?
Is variable url null?
On 14 August 2012 16:18, Rana ven12...@yahoo.com wrote:
Having trouble getting the URL, getting null when getting the ChangeSet
file.
Please let me know what is the problem.
ResourceChangeScannerConfiguration conf =
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.3.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e823
It was removed in 5.2 (onwards) ...due to lack of interest and it falling
behind
On 14 August 2012 16:45, dme1 meh...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed Drools v5.4.0 Final. I
This is a classpath related issue.
Please ensure src/main/resources is on your classpath (if running from
within Eclipse for example, files within the resources folder are normally
excluded).
On 14 August 2012 17:12, Rana ven12...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is the place I am getting the NPE.
Hello,
Eclipse only has the text based DRL rule editor. This is guided in the
sense that it has (should have, I've not looked recently) auto-complete.
GWT is Google Web Toolkit and is used by Guvnor; hence the statement GWT
based Guided Editor in Guvnor.
The editor that has been removed was
Strangely it appears it works no better than before; you have simply moved
the error from a malformed classpath reference to a malformed file-system
reference.
The proximate cause is now Caused by: java.net.MalformedURLException:
unknown protocol: d. The path
There is none with which I am aware of; however there might be something in
the community.
The concept has been loosely spoken about within the Drools team however
nothing more concrete.
Wait to see if there are replies from anybody else before drawing your
conclusion.
With kind regards,
Mike
In DRL terms this is quite simple:-
when
$instance1 : ObjA( $mailID : mailId )
ObjA( this != $instance1, mailId != $mailId )
then
...
This translates to a XLS decision table like this:-
| CONDITION | CONDITION | CONDITION|
Hi Stephen,
You've made my afternoon ;)
The operation of otherwise is rather dumb. It does not have any
understanding of what groups of rows it is meant to limit it's search of
values to construct the not in part.
As you have discovered, in your case, the Account column has no
significance
Guvnor 5.4 uses Seam 3 whereas Guvnor 5.3 used Seam 2.
At the same time the org.drools.guvnor.server.security.NilAuthenticator was
removed.
AFAIK you should be able to copy
org.drools.guvnor.server.security.DemoAuthenticator and have it
authenticate regardless of user credentials.
If the values are dynamic and the Fact/Field static for a keyword you could
consider using a Template or Decision Table, where for example a single
column represents a Fact/Field and the user simply provides the values.
I am surprised to read you found DSL had to be defined for every Condition
or
Hello,
Please advise which version of Guvnor you are using.
Please also provide a few explicit examples where behavior is not as you'd
expect (screen shots of the rule and a few words would be cool).
Thanks,
Mike
On 26 July 2012 20:42, Vann_the_Red aba...@ntelx.com wrote:
Hello. I started
Try reading the Drools Expert User Guide section about the use of Globals :)
Globals are not Facts to be reason in the Left-Hand-Side (WHEN) part of a
rule.
Either use the Global (assuming it contains static data) and initialize it
correctly from within Java code (see the User Guide) or insert
I have tried with 5.4.0.Final and found everything to work as required.
These are the steps I followed (which don't appear out of the ordinary):-
1) Create new Declarative Model (let's call in GADM) in Global Area
2) Define GADM.
3) Save GADM.
4) Create new Package (called P1)
5) Create new
So, you have multiple CSVBeanAgent's (created from a text file somewhere).
These are stored in a Map created in Java called globals.
Where do you actually set the global in WorkingMemory: See
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/drools-expert-docs/html/ch04.html#d0e4482
.
Hi,
There have been a few messages recently suggesting there are problems
running Guvnor 5.4.0.Final on JBoss AS 7.1.1.Final.
I had a check and this is what I found:-
1) Downloaded guvnor-5.4.0-Final.zip from Drools website
2) Unzip
3) Deploy guvnor-5.4.0.Final-jboss-as-7.0.war to JBoss AS
Different versions of the Eclipse Plugin and Guvnor is definitely a problem
you will want to eliminate.
I had no problem finding a download the the Eclipse Plugin:
http://download.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-tools-distribution-5.4.0.Final.zip.
There was a change made in 5.4
You need Guvnor 5.4 and the Eclipse Plugin 5.4.
Both are available here: http://www.jboss.org/drools/downloads
On 26 July 2012 14:26, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
hey mike,
thankz for the reply..
but i m using the plugin which yu supplied..i need a plugin for GUVNOR
I notice that the Drools download page has a link to older versions.
Maybe, just maybe, there's a slight chance following the link will lead you
to what you seek.
I don't know it must be worth a try. The internet is full of these links
and they seem to go to useful places.
With kind regards,
OK, great I understand :)
What version of Guvnor are you using?
On 25 July 2012 07:18, rodolphio m.rindflei...@gameartstudio.de wrote:
Hi manstis,
I allready have made the 2 steps you mentioned above. This is not the
problem.
The problem is the following step 3:
Going to the Edit tab in
drools-verifier (the scaffolding thereof at least) could be used in
principle.
drools-verifier builds an AST of a rule's definition that is then evaluated
by some bundled validation\verification rules.
In principle you could use the AST and your own rules to perform a search.
Guvnor uses JCR
Sounds like there's a problem :(
Could somebody please raise a JIRA (for Guvnor) and provide full details
of exactly what the problem is (including a repository export, if possible).
With kind regards,
Mike
On 24 July 2012 13:20, Vincent LEGENDRE
vincent.legen...@eurodecision.comwrote:
TBH, I don't understand what it is you are having problems with: this
thread seems to have gone full-circle.
As Esteban states, to share a model in multiple Guvnor packages you need to:
1) Create a model in the Global Area
2) Create a mode in the individual package (choosing to import from Global
What version of Guvnor are you using?
It is impossible to define the DRL you show below with pre-5.4.
Pre-5.4 you have to have a field constraint on the pattern (even if it's
this != null).
Add conditon-Add pattern-Customer (binding\variable $cc)-Add field,
this-Add operator, is not null.
With
Eh? That doesn't make sense.
Please post a screen shot of your decision table (with the header expanded
so I can see your column definitions) and the result of Show source for
it.
On 20 July 2012 13:55, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
hi mike,
actually i have values in my
Other than the ways that have already been suggested on this thread? No.
On 20 July 2012 14:11, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
thankz mike,
not equal to null helped !!
can yu suggest me a way of using setFocus() in DT ?
--
View this message in context:
If you're using 5.4 you can add a BRL Action column and use a free-format
DRL fragment.
Prior to 5.4 the above is not possible. In which case an alternative might
be to use Rule Templates instead.
On 19 July 2012 13:02, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
by what i see predicate
You haven't asked any questions, merely stated you have an error message.
Try posting some supporting code (DRL, related Java etc) it might help
people.
On 17 July 2012 10:03, ashwindrool ashwin.khandelwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thnks for Replying ,
Plz give some idea in above issue.
--
View
When you say the loop works fine, do the System.out's print what you expect?
On 17 July 2012 10:34, ashwindrool ashwin.khandelwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Mike,Laune
I am handling 100thousand records for that i am using CSV file and
converting those records into objects which i am using for
The mortgages example uses a declarative model, not a POJO JAR model.
There will be an asset for the model.
On 13 July 2012 08:46, Ravikiran ravikiran.kaka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed drools-guvnor.war version 5.4.0 in Jboss AS 7. When i
launch
the guvnor for the first time, it
Might I suggest your friend looks at Drool's JIRA list:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES
Pick something they feel they understand and would like to tackle.
Join us on IRC for guidance.
Of course, your friend might prefer to help with a project that uses
Drools...
In which case might I
Read the Guvnor user guide?
On 12 July 2012 07:52, arup arup4u2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Can u tell me how can i add a fresh rule using Rest api to the
guvnor???
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Customizing-Drools-Guvnor-tp4018616.html
Sent from
or do yu need more data ??
Rules 2 and 3 in their entirety would be a good starting point.
On 12 July 2012 09:27, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
rule rule1
agenda-group 1
salience 0
when
$a : Account()
$h :
What rules are in agenda-group 3?
On 12 July 2012 09:58, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
rule rule1
agenda-group 1
salience 0
when
$a : Account()
$h : HashMap(!(this[Aggregate_Balance]=5))
then
setFocus(2)
end
rule
Have you tried 5.4.0.Final?
The log below suggests you are using 5.4.0.CR1.
On 11 July 2012 07:53, elena_nard...@libero.it elena_nard...@libero.itwrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to deploy GUVNOR 5.4.0 on TOMCAT 6.0.35 but I met the
following error:
11-lug-2012 8.44.17
The class required by Guvnor, org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils, doesn't
exist in 3-3.1.
It has been renamed org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils in 3-3.1.
On 11 July 2012 12:15, chrisLi shengtao0...@163.com wrote:
Hi, All
I am using Guvnor 5.4.0 Final with Tomcat 6.0.35. And I wanted
We don't build a version of Guvnor 5.4 that will run on JBoss AS 5.0.1 out
of the box only AS 7.x.
Different AS's bundle different JARs and different versions thereof so we
had to limit the out of the box configurations we provide.
We provide for JBoss AS7, JBoss EAP 5.1 and Tomcat 6.0.
With
This is not possible with 5.2.
With 5.4 you can create a decision table with a column defined as a BRL
fragment (guided rule editor).
This will allow you to use matches or sounds like. Matches could also
be used to emulate starts with or ends with given the correct regular
expression.
This JIRA
You don't need to create a global.
You do however need to add an import for the class in the POJO JAR.
This can be accomplished on the same screen. Ensure you save the package
after adding the import.
Ideally, when importing a POJO model from the Global Area, the imports
should be added
No.
Expansion is performed within Guvnor at package compilation time. Currently
this is limited to the data entered within Guvnor.
Feel free to raise a JIRA requesting this feature (or any external source
for that matter) at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR (no promise as
to when it will
The WAR you have used targets JBoss AS 7.x.
We do not test Guvnor 5.4.0.Final on JBoss AS 4.x and will not do so.
Regrettably, should you need to use JBoss AS 4.x, you will need to find
your own solutions (although there may be other community members who can
help).
We needed to package as
AFAIK, you are correct.
A DRL file contains rules and related constructs (declarative types,
functions, queries etc).
A BPMN2 file (or it's legacy RuleFlow predecessor) contains a process
definition.
The two represent different concepts and cannot be converted between each
other.
With kind
The Global Area is a container for assets you might like to share across
different packages.
For example, you might have a POJO Model that you want to use in two
different packages.
Assets in the Global Area are *not* in packages unless you import them into
the package.
Rules are assets so the
Strange I recall this very same question being asked numerous times in the
past week.
Whilst a fan of Bill Murray, in particular the film Ground Hog Day, I have
no wish to relive your question on a continual loop.
Download drools-verifier, look at the code, ask directed questions; i.e.
what
Think of the Global Area as a place where assets can be stored to share
across packages.
When you build a package assets linked from the Global Area will be
included. This package is the KnowledgeBase, the runtime, with which rules
will lead to activations.
It is impossible to upload FACTS to
Strange I recall this very same question being asked numerous times in the
past week.
Whilst a fan of Bill Murray, in particular the film Ground Hog Day, I have
no wish to relive your question on a continual loop.
Download drools-verifier, look at the code, ask directed questions; i.e.
what
How do you know what set of rules need to be executed?
Do you make the decision based upon the business-transaction or Object
types, or Object properties?
I only ask as you may not need to worry about which rules run and which do
not if you can differentiate at the Object level. For example:-
Guvnor only supports traits in technical rules (which are effectively
free-format DRL, i.e. text).
I think traits are still considered experimental at this stage (Sotty, Mark
can you confirm?) so we'd be reluctant to introduce better UI support at
this time.
The need to add at some stage has
Hi Benjamin,
Your assumptions are correct - not so green after all :)
Technical Rules are just plain text DRL, so whatever drools-expert supports
is possible.
TBH, I've not heard of anybody else using traits (or attempting to) in
Guvnor, so any feedback would be great.
AFAIK, experimental
Thanks Davide, your comments are much appreciated.
sent on the move
On 22 Jun 2012 22:52, Davide Sottara dso...@gmail.com wrote:
Experimental means it has not been tested thoroughly yet, so it might be
subject to improvements and even some language changes. Also, it means that
the docs are
I've not personally seen this before.
How does it look on Fire Fox or Chrome?
On 20 June 2012 18:54, TonyN tony.n.ngu...@boeing.com wrote:
I am experiencing this issue with source viewing in the Guvnor (5.4.0
Final).
The text are all 'right' justified (please see pic attached) 5.2.0 Final
Ok, that's great. At least it isn't systematic. Could you please raise a
JIRA (for GUVNOR) and we'll take a look pull requests are always
welcome too :)
sent on the move
On 20 Jun 2012 21:37, TonyN tony.n.ngu...@boeing.com wrote:
HI Mike,
Firefox 10.0.4 works fine...I don't have Chrome
?
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you receive Guvnor from the Drools download page it is not a Red Hat
product
Your requirement is not clear.
What do you want to store in a database? Rules, Facts?
Is 50,000 records in one of my decision tables 50k rows or 50k facts?
If facts what makes you thinking moving them from in-memory objects to a
database will bring any performance gains?
On 15 June 2012 07:38,
It most certainly sounds like a bug, please create a JIRA and attach a
repository showing the problem.
sent on the move
On 15 Jun 2012 15:28, Sandjaja, Dominik dominik.sandj...@it-motive.de
wrote:
**
Hi everybody,
I use the advanced, dependent enumeration concepts of the Guvnor DSL as
Drools provides an excellent user-guide.
Plenty in there relating to Globals and Queries if I remember correctly.
On 14 June 2012 17:58, Brajesh brajesh4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello manstis
Thanks for your fast reply but can you provide me a small piece of code
what
you said theoretically so
Sounds like a bug to me.
Please raise a JIRA at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR, including a
self-contained repository export and your description below.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 13 June 2012 16:47, Sandjaja, Dominik dominik.sandj...@it-motive.dewrote:
**
I use Guvnor 5.4.0 with
As far as I am concerned, yes.
Use the URL I included in my previous email.
sent on the move
On 9 Jun 2012 06:04, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike !
Will it be OK to go with *5.5.0-SNAPSHOT*.?? Is formula part in
5.5.0-SNAPSHOT of THEN working..??
Thanks !
--
I guess that depends on how you define quality.
On 8 June 2012 09:00, paco fifi_nji...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm using Drools-verifier to verify the qualities of the rules.
But I'd like to know how to use it to verify the quality of the
ruleflow(all
rules in
any ruleflow)
This is the commit that fixes is:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/guvnor/commit/eed225c10df8b95404f801f1af7c353299b9ae6e
I am downloading the SNAPSHOT from
https://hudson.jboss.org/jenkins/job/guvnor/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/and
will try.
I can confirm (again) that it works as expected using
Download complete.
Deployed guvnor-5.5.0-SNAPSHOT-tomcat-6.0.war to Tomcat 6.0.30.
Ran.
Works OK.
Am I missing something?
On 8 June 2012 20:54, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the commit that fixes is:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/guvnor/commit
Guvnor uses JCR that provides the means to store its content in a database.
The generated repository configuration file defines table prefixes to try
to eliminate potential name clashes.
If importing into a schema that has pre-existing objects (that you cannot
destroy) you could try changing the
Hi Jim,
droolsjbpm-build-bootstrap\README.md contains some recommendations (all be
it not specifically for web-server configutation).
Building with maven we recommend: -Xms256m -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Running from within Eclipse we recommend: -Xms512m -Xmx2048m
-XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Are you able to determine which object already existed?
Oracle's log should give some more information.
What version of Oracle are you using too?
On 5 June 2012 18:53, jnorris james.nor...@pb.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to get the drools-guvnor web-app (5.4.0.Final) to work with
Oracle.
Working Sets do not function for decision tables, only the web-guided BRL
editor.
Please feel free to raise a JIRA requesting the enhancement:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR
Event better, roll up your shirt sleeves, get involved and submit a pull
request :)
With kind regards,
Mike
On
It should in theory be a relatively simple enhancement.
Please feel free to request such an enhancement:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR.
A pull request providing such functionality is always welcome :)
Feel free to come along to #guvnordev if you need some guidance.
With kind regards,
By Category Home Mortgage
Eligibility rule Underage and then click on open, you get this
screen using which you can create/edit the rule graphically.
Thanks,
Abdullah
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Michael Anstis
michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want to add a new editor to Guvnor, or use
You cannot merge multiple ACTION columns into a single DRL statement.
If your individual key components can be bound as individual CONDITION
Colum constraints the ACTION need only contain the value.
sent on the move
On 1 Jun 2012 21:18, chsekhar chandrasekha...@gmail.com wrote:
In the
But each column became a separate DRL fragment ;) but glad to read you got
it working :)
One for me to remember. Thanks Vincent
sent on the move
On 2 Jun 2012 01:47, chsekhar chandrasekha...@gmail.com wrote:
I was able to merge data from multiple ACTION columns in decision table.
First
drools-verifier is the usual suggestion for such things.
It comes bundled with a set of validation\verification rules but you can
add your own too.
On 31 May 2012 08:42, paco fifi_nji...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I am looking for something that can help me to detect the following errors:
redundancies,
The XML format produced by XmlDumper is an XML representation of various
internal Descriptors used by Drools Expert and only supports features up to
4.0
It is unfortunately not the same as that stored internally in Guvnor (which
is simply a XStream representation of Guvnor's internal model).
This https://community.jboss.org/wiki/DroolsVerifier and Google are
probably your best bets.
On 31 May 2012 13:22, paco fifi_nji...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Thank yyou very much.
But can you tell me where can I find documentation and examples about
Drools
verifier?
Thanks
Paco
--
View this
I suspect it is caused by the spreadsheet validations you have enabled for
rows 19 onwards, columns E and F.
Try removing these - as they look to be a hang-over from (presumably)
basing the workbook on an existing example somewhere.
On 29 May 2012 11:31, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
It's because rows 31-34 contain [6;99] whereas your condition just shows
policyYear == $param so you're getting DRL like Commission( policyTear
== [6;99] )
On 28 May 2012 13:27, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi !
I am getting error in my decision tableplease verify it...I am
Do you want to add a new editor to Guvnor, or use a Guvnor editor in your
own application?
On 28 May 2012 19:51, Abdullah Shaikh abdullah.shaik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to drools guvnor. I was able to create simple drl file and
run from classpath and from guvnor too using url.
I
Assuming TYPE_1 is the opposite of TYPE_2 and not just a difference it
should work.
What is opposite is perhaps difficult to define as there is probably some
semantics involved: up\down, left\right, yes\no.
These have well defined meanings and hence we can say with some certainty
that these are
It should be working in 5.5.0.beta1.
5.4.0.Final is what we released. I would not recommend using 5.4.0.beta1 as
it is pre-release and some of it's internals could have changed for
5.4.0.Final (and later).
Consequentially, and I believer other community members have been caught
out this way,
The THEN part is either (depending upon the rule's dialect) a Java or
MVEL code block.
Java defines the ^ operators as a bitwise exclusive or. I suspect you
should probably use Math.pow.
Math is in the java.lang package so you shouldn't need to explicitly import.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 24
Formula box should be OK, but check the generated DRL.
On 24 May 2012 11:50, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike and many thanks for replying !
shall I use *Math.pow* in free form DRL of THEN or can I use in Formula
Box...???
thanks !!
--
View this message in context:
The variables in the RHS's DRL aren't prefixed with $ as they are in the
LHS.
sent on the move
On 24 May 2012 13:52, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Laune and thanks for replying !!
*1.* I am using *5.4.0 Beta* 1... I also tried by using *Math.pow* as Mike
posted above but by
I still see a sumAssured without $ on line 6.
sent on the move
On 24 May 2012 14:35, zeeshan zeeshan.spr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike !
I tried with prefix $ too on the RHS, still giving error
*[DeathBenefitRule] Unable to Analyse Expression
$deathBenefit.setSumAssured(
It is true Guvnor stores some asset types as XML internally. There is
however no schema (we simply use XStream to serialise) and it most
certainly is not compliant with any industry standard on rule
representation (if indeed there is a single well defined open standa
sent on the move
On 24 May
oops... hit send too soon...
...open standard, although OMG is working on a Decision Model Notation
standard that will help with the interchange of some types).
So, in short, the answer is no.
sent on the move
On 24 May 2012 16:01, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
It is true
501 - 600 of 1357 matches
Mail list logo
