On 2 Jun 2014, at 14:58, Mercier Jonathan wrote:
> Thanks Mark simple and clear :-)
>
> Did you you have somewhere a roadmap ?
> to know:
>- when nearly 6.0.2 will come
6.1 CR should be out this week
>- when concurrent approach wil be add
Our new algorithm has been designed for paralle
Le 02/06/2014 15:43, Mark Proctor a écrit :
> I thought clips did do disjunction normal form? in that all ‘or’s are removed
> from the body of the tree and moved to the root, thus rewriting the logic
> into separate rules? This docs shows an ‘or’ rule is the equivalent of
> disjunction normal fo
I thought clips did do disjunction normal form? in that all ‘or’s are removed
from the body of the tree and moved to the root, thus rewriting the logic into
separate rules? This docs shows an ‘or’ rule is the equivalent of disjunction
normal form:
http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~sylee/courses/clips/
Hi,
We use Drools at this time to explore some possibilities. We have an old
system, clips based and with clips rules need to be wrote to a
disjunctive normal form because they are no internal processing to
transform user rule to a disjunctive normal form.
As Drools generate a graph (Phreak) i
