Wolfgang,
Yes, I agree. We've been careful with that we expose on the
knowledge-api, but this is clearly an interface that should be there.
Will take care of it.
Edson
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> @Edson: There is, of course, the fundamental problem of t
@Edson: There is, of course, the fundamental problem of the
pseudo-clock feature being full-bodiedly announced in Drools Fusion
but
SessionPseudoClock remaining absent from the stable API. While the
Fusion manual emphasizes (correctly) that a pseudo-clock is useful in
unit test it's important to no
Cyril,
Thank you for reporting and providing a well written test case. It
really helps.
We've all been involved with a number of other tasks, including the
workshops from last week and JBW this week, that prevented me and others
from working on tickets. Having said that, because the test
On 25/06/2012, Cyril Sochor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created two issues in bugtracker, second one with pull request.
> JBRULES-3528 Deadlock when using pseudo session clock
PseudoClockScheduler is not in the stable API and not too well documented.
There is no point in running a session with a pseudo-c
Hi,
I created two issues in bugtracker, second one with pull request.
JBRULES-3528 Deadlock when using pseudo session clock
JBRULES-3529 JMS messenger for JBOSS AS 7.1
Issues are 20 days without any response. What's wrong?
Thank you,
Cyril Sochor
___
