You're welcome, good to hear that it's fixed already!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/OptaPlanner-score-corruption-when-using-insertLogical-with-custom-objects-tp4024932p4025306.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This time a genuine bug was reproduced and it's fixed for 6.0.0.CR2
(thanks to Mario).
Thanks for reporting pvandenbrink :)
On 25-07-13 14:57, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
Yes, please reopen the jira issue if you're able to reproduce it with
6.0.0.Beta5 or higher.
Done, I've modified
On 24-07-13 17:05, pvandenbrink wrote:
Thanks for looking into it, and you're right. Looks like I made an error in
the reproducer project, sorry... The original code didn't have this
equals/hashcode problem. After fixing this in the reproducer, the example
schedule works fine though, so I'll
ge0ffrey wrote
Yes, please reopen the jira issue if you're able to reproduce it with
6.0.0.Beta5 or higher.
Done, I've modified the dataset, so the issue's reproducible again in
6.0.0.Beta5 and 6.0.0.SNAPSHOT, with the corrected equals/hashcode for
FamilyStart.
--
View this message in
Turns out this is a user problem in the equals and hashcode of
FamilyStart, not a bug in Drools or OptaPlanner :)
@Override
public boolean equals(Object other)
{
if ((this == other))
return true;
if (!(other instanceof FamilyStart))
ge0ffrey wrote
Turns out this is a user problem in the equals and hashcode of
FamilyStart, not a bug in Drools or OptaPlanner :)
@Override
public boolean equals(Object other)
{
if ((this == other))
return true;
if (!(other instanceof
Ok, I've created a small reproducer and attached it to this issue:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLANNER-182
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/OptaPlanner-score-corruption-when-using-insertLogical-with-custom-objects-tp4024932p4025055.html
Sent from the
Thanks. The zip looks good and isolated (= usable for me). I might look
into it after PLANNER-160 is done next week.
On 19-07-13 11:25, pvandenbrink wrote:
Ok, I've created a small reproducer and attached it to this issue:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLANNER-182
--
View this message
ge0ffrey wrote
Do you have this issue in 5.4 too? E.g.: the 5.4 equivalent of full
assert (TRACE) does not detect score corruption?
I've tried this and actually, yes, it happens with TRACE in 5.4 as well. So
it's not an issue introduced by the upgrade to Beta5, then.
ge0ffrey wrote
Maybe
On 17-07-13 11:59, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
Do you have this issue in 5.4 too? E.g.: the 5.4 equivalent of full
assert (TRACE) does not detect score corruption?
I've tried this and actually, yes, it happens with TRACE in 5.4 as well. So
it's not an issue introduced by the upgrade
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules xml file before the insertLogical. At
one point shortly
On 17-07-13 13:02, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules xml file before
ge0ffrey wrote
On 17-07-13 13:02, pvandenbrink wrote:
ge0ffrey wrote
The 7 one probably got inserted with it didn't reach to 5 yet. That was
a good logicalInsertion.
The issue is, why didn't it get retracted when a move made changes so it
did reach to 5?
I've added a printline in the rules
Hi,
I've been using Drools Planner with success for a while for our Conversation
planning tool. It's used by schools to plan conversations between teachers
and parents of schoolgoing children.
Recently I checked on the new developments on Drools (the current version
we're using in production is
On 16-07-13 16:24, pvandenbrink wrote:
Hi,
I've been using Drools Planner with success for a while for our Conversation
planning tool. It's used by schools to plan conversations between teachers
and parents of schoolgoing children.
Great to hear :)
Sounds like an interesting use case story.
15 matches
Mail list logo
