Re: [rules-users] Regression 5.1-5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

2011-10-28 Thread abr
I second that problem. Switching from Drools 5.1 to 5.2 or 5.3 brought issues that were resolved by fully qualifying fact names. Here are samples illustrating the problem: *Sample1:* *Sample2:* *Sample3 (continues Sample2 as the following is in the same DRL file):* Like thomas, adding

Re: [rules-users] Regression 5.1-5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

2011-10-28 Thread Michael Anstis
Added code examples... * Sample1:* import namespace1.MyObject; rule r when namespace2.MyObject( value == 3 ) MyObject( attr1 == foo ) //Here, got a parsing error stating attr1 is not a field because it looks it up from namespace2.MyObject then // ... end *Sample2:* import

[rules-users] Regression 5.1-5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

2011-08-19 Thread Swindells, Thomas
I'm in the progress of updating from Drools 5.1 to 5.2 in the hope of solving problems we are having with intermittent mysteriously missing activations. I've found a regression with the compiler which I don't know whether anybody else has noticed before. In our application we've got two