Re: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Mark Proctor
Harsh Jetly wrote: I have been evaluating the rule engine (ie Drools 4.0.4). I have created an application which has about 20 rules . I insert about 500 arraylists into the working memory and each arraylist contains about 4 objects. The rule engine picks the object that is the best match from

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Corneil du Plessis
Make sure when you do performance testing that you run through enough iterations so that the engine code benefits from HotSpot. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harsh Jetly Sent: 13 August 2008 11:03 To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Anstis, Michael (M.)
Why not add your ArrayList items individually into WM? rule P1 110 salience 1 activation-group 1 when PriorityType( pricetype == 10,20,30,40,110 ) t:TlbObjectAttributeData( lngAttrTypeId == 110 ) then result.add(t); end Would this not give

Re: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Mark Proctor
Corneil du Plessis wrote: Make sure when you do performance testing that you run through enough iterations so that the engine code benefits from HotSpot. Something to be aware of is that there are still many optimsation we can do to Drools. One of them is to take our interpretted Rete

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Hehl, Thomas
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:18 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools Corneil du Plessis wrote: Make sure when you do performance testing that you run through enough iterations

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Hehl, Thomas
What does this mean? Because of garbage collection? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Corneil du Plessis Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:42 AM To: 'Rules Users List' Subject: RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools Make sure when you do

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Hehl, Thomas
it on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:18 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools Corneil du Plessis wrote: Make sure when you do performance testing that you run

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Corneil du Plessis
: 13 August 2008 13:47 To: 'Rules Users List' Subject: RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools What does this mean? Because of garbage collection? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Corneil du Plessis Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:42 AM

RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools

2008-08-13 Thread Hehl, Thomas
Right, including optimization controls over garbage collection. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Corneil du Plessis Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:50 AM To: 'Rules Users List' Subject: RE: [rules-users] Java code Vs Drools No HotSpot