It's true Kris Verlaenen.
But the first set is strange, isn't it?
thanks,
Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ruleflow-and-persistence-tf4415033.html#a12608948
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The expected behavior is actually the second one, did you really get those
results when executing the first set? The reason is that you should notify
the engine if you change a product (so it can re-evaluate). Otherwise, it
will never know that the product has changed price and will still use
Verlaenen
Envoyé : lundi 10 septembre 2007 16:37
À : Rules Users List
Objet : Re: [rules-users] Ruleflow and persistence
The expected behavior is actually the second one, did you really get those
results when executing the first set? The reason is that you should notify the
engine if you change
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Ruleflow and persistence
I have really those results in the first set (I put a project in the forum)
If I put an update I loop...
With a no-loop it seems work
