that.
Thank you
Dominik
Von: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Anstis
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2014 15:19
An: Rules Users List
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Efficiency questions about DSL
It's a deliberate decision in the workbench
Is it a deliberate choice to not include DSL files in the same package ?
If we are limited to the same folder (or same package), what do you think
about supporting inheritance in DSL files ? With this feature we could
provide to the community generic translation DSL files for many languages.
So many questions
I can comment on the workbench related aspects.
The workbench only includes DSL files for authoring DSLR (or RDSLR) files
that are in the same folder as the rule. I use the term folder as we
don't support same package (which would imply if the same package existed
in
Hum, actually for the first point it doesn't work only when DSL files come
from a dependent maven project (I have generic DSL files in a separate maven
project).
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Efficiency-questions-about-DSL-tp4028774p4028779.html
Sent from
