When I use my rule flow with only one asserted fact it work very well, but
when I assert more than one fact it goes wrong. I used the Audit View to fix
the problem.
My rule flow : Start - ruleFlowGroup1 - split - ruleFlowGroup2
-
Michael Neale michael.neale at gmail.com writes:
Hi Arjun - I wouldn't recommend re-using session unless there is some
expensive state you wish to reuse. Pooling them will use up far more resources
then freeing them. You should only pool expensive to obtain resources.
Hi Michael,
thanks
Hi Burr,
That would be very kind from you, if you could send me the WAR,
Thank you,
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi spilirit,
Try copy all your dependencies to the WebContent/WEB-INF/lib instead
referring in your project. The Eclipse IDE will automatically add
these libs to your classpath and to your exported war.
Regards
Fernando Meyer http://fmeyer.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: 0xD804DDFB
Hi,
I am getting the following error when I try to run the rules in
bulk(EG: 5 or 6 rules together). But when I start running the rules
individually, all the rules are working fine.
0060 SystemErr R org.drools.spi.ConsequenceException:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Hi,
I reported this earlier also, I cant understand why do we not provide AGENDA-
Group support for Decision tables, while we do provide Activation?
See DefaultRuleSheetListener.
I need to do two things:
1. Support sequencing of rule groups
2. allow two modes: a. Execute all rules, b. Break on
I am working on a drools application with few rules and large number
of facts. In my first design I tried to avoid excessive joins thinking
I was helping improve performance but didnt realized that I was
actually shooting myself in the foot. I was basically creating a
single facade-fact that
Anthony,
If you have a choice on your binding framework, I might suggesting
switching to Castor. I had the same problem you experienced and
switched to Castor and it worked like a champ.
Ron
On 7/23/07, trandinh tho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I got same problem to Chris's. Java classes
Just info, I ran a test on about a million requests (loop) and 50 threads.
approx 6 business Obectts and 15 rules. I did get any concurrent modfication
issues on JBoss Rules 4. Can you please post the rule scripts/DRL used
regards,
Arjun
Sorry Typo. I was saying is I did not get any
