Re: [rules-users] Order of firing rules
Hi Rajesh, Let us say Object obj is of type Foo and both rule1 and rule2 work on Foo, then both rule1 and rule 2 will work on obj. Let us say when obj is added into working memory, rule 1 is fired based on some criterion and rule 2 would not fire on this. However, since rule1 was fired which modified it in some way that rule 2 can be fired, then this will also happen. Send an example of what you are trying. -Krishnan. On 6/4/07, Rajesh.Sachin10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I asserted 4 objects of a class with class name DemoClass in to working memory. In rule one I am creating a reference for the DemoClass and implementing the logic. In rule2,… I am creating another reference of the DemoClass .so that time it is accessing the next asserted object present in the workingmemory. But my requirement is to access the same object which is accessed in rule 1. I don't need to access other 3 objects in working memory. It is possible to access the same object in rule 2, which I accessed in rule 1? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Order-of-firing-rules-tf3865719.html#a10951337 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) Never assume the obvious is true. - William Safire ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] new patch
Hi, I am using the 4.0 M2 branch currently and it prints out any function that I write in the rule file during loading of the rule. I need to add this into production code, will I be able to get a new patch so that I can check in right set of jars. thanks, Krishnan. -- Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) Never assume the obvious is true. - William Safire ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Accessing an object in multiple rule
Hi, I asserted 4 objects of a class with class name “DemoClass” in to working memory. In rule one I am creating a reference for the DemoClass and implementing the logic. In rule2,… I am creating another reference of the DemoClass .so that time it is accessing the next asserted object present in the workingmemory. But my requirement is to access the same object which is accessed in rule 1. I don't need to access other 3 objects in working memory. It is possible to access the same object in rule 2, which I accessed in rule 1? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Accessing-an-object-in-multiple-rule-tf3866060.html#a10952423 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Order of firing rules
Hi, If we wrote 6 [when] [then] rules in an drl file, there is any order in firing the rules or the rules get fired in random? If it is fired in random, there is any method or keywords to control the order of firing the rules? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Order-of-firing-rules-tf3866064.html#a10952429 Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Accessing an object in multiple rule
The object will be available in any rule that matches it. Mark Rajesh.Sachin10 wrote: Hi, I asserted 4 objects of a class with class name “DemoClass” in to working memory. In rule one I am creating a reference for the DemoClass and implementing the logic. In rule2,… I am creating another reference of the DemoClass .so that time it is accessing the next asserted object present in the workingmemory. But my requirement is to access the same object which is accessed in rule 1. I don't need to access other 3 objects in working memory. It is possible to access the same object in rule 2, which I accessed in rule 1? ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] new patch
M3 is out this week, that printout will be removed. Um why are you putting milestone releases into a production build? These are not production releases, but snapshots of unstable development releases. It's your choice, but just don't moan when api's change or you find some bug, like print statements. Mark Krishnan wrote: Hi, I am using the 4.0 M2 branch currently and it prints out any function that I write in the rule file during loading of the rule. I need to add this into production code, will I be able to get a new patch so that I can check in right set of jars. thanks, Krishnan. -- Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) Never assume the obvious is true. - William Safire ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Localization in DSL
In theory you can write DSLs in any languages, I ain't sure about encoding issues, need to check with tirelli. btw, just try with the japanese encoding and give us your feedback and some screenshots, then we can change that pt_br dsl in jbossrules home ;) We have a ticket to implement i18n internationalization support in BRMS, http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-872 It isn't an easy task at moment, because mostly of the BRMS strings are inside widget's code. So, probably this feature will be available on next version's milestones. Contributors are welcome. Fernando Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 5A6D 3374 B055 A513 9A02 A03B 3DB3 7485 D804 DDFB On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Shigeaki Wakizaka wrote: Hello. I'd like to use Japanese in DSL. Is it possible? Do you have a plan to do the localize-thing with DSL and brand-new BRMS? Thanks in advance Shige ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Localization in DSL
2007/6/5, Fernando Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In theory you can write DSLs in any languages, I ain't sure about encoding issues, need to check with tirelli. btw, just try with the japanese encoding and give us your feedback and some screenshots, then we can change that pt_br dsl in jbossrules home ;) Ok, I'l try it. ;-) Thanks!! Shige ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
