Re: [rules-users] suggestion for drl grammar: single-element constraints

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Proctor
I've been thinking about this too, although I idea I had was for a default field. List( 5 ) from collect( Bus( color == red ) ) So we could define default fields that can be used in the way you said. Open a jira and we'll consider this for the next major release. Mark Godmar Back wrote: If

[rules-users] RE: RE: RE: Regarding Package .Pkg

2007-10-04 Thread Drool_Beginner
Hi Michael, Can you please provide some code sample for building rule with API. Regrads, Abhi... Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote: I recall reading other users building rules with the API. But it is not something I have any experience of. Sorry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[rules-users] RE: How to set the static variable

2007-10-04 Thread Sikkandar Nawabjan
/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071004/90322891/smime-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:46:10 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [rules-users] Fucntion call in rule To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text

[rules-users] Just Java 2007 Slides (in Portuguese)

2007-10-04 Thread Edson Tirelli
For those of you that speaks Portuguese, here are the slides I used in yesterday's presentation at Just Java 2007 Conference in Brazil. http://blog.athico.com/2007/10/just-java-2007-slides.html []s Edson -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office:

[rules-users] RE: How to set the static variable

2007-10-04 Thread Anstis, Michael \(M.\)
/rules-users -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4159 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071004/90322891/s mime-0001.bin

[rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Chris West
Hello, Does anyone know why rule GoodBye2 below does not compile, but rule GoodBye1 does compile using Drools 4.0.0? The only difference is the not. Shouldn't this be valid? Thanks, -Chris package com.sample import com.sample.DroolsTest.Message; import com.sample.DroolsTest.Foo; import

Re: [rules-users] Fucntion call in rule

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Proctor
As always with XML. First do it in DRL, when that works us the XMLDumper to get the working XML out. This should provide you everything you know. Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I wrote a function in my rule file *boolean test(String name) *and when i use this function in the lhs/lhs part

RE: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Anstis, Michael \(M.\)
What if you try not (Foo(id == 10) from $foos)? _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris West Sent: 04 October 2007 16:59 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] using from with not It does not compile. The error is: unknown:32:20 mismatched

Re: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Chris West
That makes it compile, but during the run I get: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.drools.reteoo.builder.BuildUtils.createBetaNodeConstraint( BuildUtils.java:168) at org.drools.reteoo.builder.GroupElementBuilder$NotBuilder.build( GroupElementBuilder.java:231) at

Re: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Edson Tirelli
From the manual: A not statement must be followed by parentheses around the pattern that it applies to. In the simplest case of a single pattern (like below) you can omit the parentheses. We improved the docs for the next version. Hope it is clearer now. But Michael got it right. []s

Re: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Chris West
Ok, the parenthesis makes sense. But when I enclose the pattern as Michael suggested, it gets a runtime error trying to parse. I attached a sample project illustrating this in an earlier response. So isn't there still a problem? -Chris On 10/4/07, Edson Tirelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Chris West
Thank you for the snapshot build. It does seem to fix the problem (and also the bugs you mentioned you fixed). -Chris On 10/4/07, Edson Tirelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I just tested your example and it works fine in 4.0.2.SNAPSHOT. We fixed a long list of bugs from 4.0.0

Re: [rules-users] using from with not

2007-10-04 Thread Chris West
With 4.0.2, I know of no showstopper bugs. But until Edson gave me the SNAPSHOT build today, I did not have 4.0.2. Thanks, -Chris On 10/4/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we still have bugs which stop you upgrading? Mark Chris West wrote: Attached is the eclipse project that

[rules-users] DRL doubts

2007-10-04 Thread Thiago H. Pojda
Hello, I'm building a rule structure (drl) from scratch. My first idea was to make a drl with it's corresponding dsl like: Geral.drl - Geral.dsl. But I saw some other kind of structures, like brl files and now I'm not sure what to use. If you guys could send me some some examples of working