Please contact me.
On 3/7/08, Arjun Dhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
> I reference of mine is interested in hiring a JBoss Rules resource for a
> new
> venture. To ensure the person is good I'm not throwing this to the general
> public; is it possible to contact you guys?
>
> lemme
Hi,
This is in relation to drools 4.0.4
I have an interesting problem. I am getting a null pointer exception when I am
inserting a fact into a StatefulSession object. What is odd about this NPE is
that, as far as I can tell (and I have inserted a breakpoint right before I
insert the fact) that
Hey guys,
I reference of mine is interested in hiring a JBoss Rules resource for a new
venture. To ensure the person is good I'm not throwing this to the general
public; is it possible to contact you guys?
lemme know.
___
rules-users mailing list
ru
Basically you need to add the drools-ant on your classpath
define your compile task
And use the rulebase task as the following example
I see numerous references to the Ant task in the documentation but see
no documentation on how to use it. Where can I find some? Google
turned up nothing...
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinf
Is there a way plug-in or a a way to validate the rules in a .drl
without actually running the rule?
Cheers,
Blair
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Interesting I had no idea something already existed (in some form).
While his supports more source type compilations than mine does
currently (csv, xls, etc), his requires a bit more configuration than
mine does.
His requires that you specify which files belong to which compiled unit
which can lea
Hi Eric,
Someone already made a contrib of a maven plugin, I think I did some review
on that code but it never went to mainstream.
could you please compare your code to the attachment?
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1273
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Eric Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joshua,
The limitation is on binding variables on different fact types on
different logical branches and using them in the consequence. If you don't
use the bindings in the consequence, you are fine.
This is a temporary limitation.
[]s
Edson
2008/3/7, Joshua Undesser <[EMAIL PROT
I have not performed any tests on this, but I'm sure the Drools guys
could comment on it as they provide serialized vs non-serialized support
in the framework. I would have to think it would decrease
initialization time as you're only de-serializing objects vs compiling a
rule set. Of course, you
Thank you Mark for the quick reply. I am curious if this is only temporary
or if this is the protocol that Drools is going to use for "or" statements?
The reason I ask is that i come from a jess/clips background, where "or" can
be used across multiple classes as shown in my example and it is v
Sounds interesting.
Does it noticeably decrease RuleBase initialization time at runtime?
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Eric Miles wrote:
Is there a Maven Drools compilation mojo, provided either by the Drools
team or some open source project? If not, I have one that I'd be
willing to su
Posted to forum for a wider audience.
I think you will need to be more specific with your use case.
With kind regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2008 15:35
To: Anstis, Michael (M.)
Subject: Can I use drools to solve my prob
Is there a Maven Drools compilation mojo, provided either by the Drools
team or some open source project? If not, I have one that I'd be
willing to submit. I think it's pretty slick and would only require a
few tweaks to truly make it useful (hard coded to currently use XStream
serialization).
__
Is the rule agent only good for drl files or serialized packages? What
about dsl or ruleflow inclusion? I'm looking through the source and it
seems it doesn't deal with either of items I've identified.
Thanks!
Eric
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-us
> But there is a problem that the method returns after the statement
> PackageBuilder builder = new PackageBuilder();
> Please le me know what the problem can be.
> Waiting for an early response
> Thanks
It's likely throwing an exception because it cannot find the rule files.
Print a stacktrace
Hi
I am using Package Builder for making rule base in my web application. The
code is:
public class DroolSetUp implements ResourceLoaderAware{
private static RuleBase ruleBase;
private Resource drlFiles;
public void setResourceLoader(ResourceLoader arg0) {
manrai.java wrote:
Hi,
We have a requirement were in we want to create an audit report after
rules have been executed. For each rule, we need to track Desired
Condition Value(as
specified in when part), Actual Condition Value(value in asserted
object) and so on. This data is to be collected
Mark Proctor wrote:
The 'or' must be used for classes of the same type.
Also there was some 'or' issues fixed for 4.0.5. You can test this from
the 4.0.x branch, let us know if it fixes all your problems.
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/branches/4.0.x/
Mark
Joshua Undesser wrote
The 'or' must be used for classes of the same type.
Mark
Joshua Undesser wrote:
I am curious if anyone else has run into this problem.It seems like there
is something wrong in the Drools LogicMy issue can be very easily be
recreated in about 5 minutes
>From eclipse I set up a new dr
Effective dates in 4.0.x come from Calendar.getInstance() so unless you
change the time that the java Calendar sees you cannot go back in time.
Trunk, and 5.0 (TBR in Q2/Q3), has a class called TimeMachine which
allows you to set the date.
If you need control of this, and in 4.0.x, you will n
Hi,
We have a requirement were in we want to create an audit report after rules
have been executed. For each rule, we need to track Desired Condition
Value(as
specified in when part), Actual Condition Value(value in asserted object)
and so on. This data is to be collected not only for rules which
22 matches
Mail list logo
