[rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0
I have been using the open source Drools 5.1 where I have been inserting facts in the RHS of a rule and that has been causing subsequent rules to fire just fine. However, I am working at a customer that requires my to use a supported product, so I have moved my rules over to JBoss Rules 5.0.2 and I find that this does not work any more. I have a declarative fact type as follows declare QuestionValidation question: String state: String mandatory: Boolean type: String end I have an init rule with high salience that inserts a number of QuestionValidations into the session. In order to test what is going on, I created a rule:- rule 'Test' dialect 'mvel' when $qv: QuestionValidation() then System.out.println( QuestionValidation found + $qv.getQuestion() + / + $qv.getState() ); end This rule never fires if I insert a QuestionValidation in the init rule! I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] But I don't see any associated ACTIVATION CREATED for this object. However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. Is there something I am missing? Do I need to to turn on rule chaining or something like that? (Surely chaining is on by default). Chris ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0
We aren't seeing the code where the insertions happen, but I suppose that's identical to repeats of QuestionValidation qc = new QuestionValidation(); insert( qv ); I'm sure you've also ascertained that the inserted value:QuestionValidation is the very same type (including package) as the one used in rule Test. I would try and use a Java equivalent for the declared class QuestionValidation, just to see whether this is at the root of the problem. -W On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote: I have been using the open source Drools 5.1 where I have been inserting facts in the RHS of a rule and that has been causing subsequent rules to fire just fine. However, I am working at a customer that requires my to use a supported product, so I have moved my rules over to JBoss Rules 5.0.2 and I find that this does not work any more. I have a declarative fact type as follows declare QuestionValidation question: String state: String mandatory: Boolean type: String end I have an init rule with high salience that inserts a number of QuestionValidations into the session. In order to test what is going on, I created a rule:- rule 'Test' dialect 'mvel' when $qv: QuestionValidation() then System.out.println( QuestionValidation found + $qv.getQuestion() + / + $qv.getState() ); end This rule never fires if I insert a QuestionValidation in the init rule! I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] But I don't see any associated ACTIVATION CREATED for this object. However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. Is there something I am missing? Do I need to to turn on rule chaining or something like that? (Surely chaining is on by default). Chris ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0
A closer look: On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote: I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well? However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing. -W ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Task Server as Jboss Service
Hmm it really depends on your scenario. Mina doesn't have message realibility and a lot of things that HornetQ provides. But If you are OK with Mina you can use it. 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com No, I didn't, I just saw some sources in the drools-process-task module. I preferred to go with what is in the documentation, wondering that Mina transport is the recommended approach. 2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com did you try the HornetQ integration? The main idea was to create a transport agnostic TaskServer, so for each implementation you can choose between different technologies depending on the situation. I'm not sure if there is another effort for this kind of deployment.. if no one else answer this mail feel free to propose and contribute with your ideas. Greetings 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com If there's no other way/plans to deploy it, even using HornetQ integration, I'll be more than happy to contribute! 2010/11/30 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com I think that your idea would be a great contribution! 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com Hi guys, I think that would be great if we could deploy the TaskServer (MinaTaskServer) as a JbossMC bean, making possible to administer it using admin-console. There's any work in this way or other plans to deploy this component? Thanks. -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
Hi all, I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a way to download the tags of Drools and configure the applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy? Regards, Anderson ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml like
this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-springfile:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd
*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/springfile:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd;
*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have some
unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rocha anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be conected to the
internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a way to download the tags of
Drools and configure the applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Question about collect and sliding windows
Hello. I have two questions about collect and sliding windows. I have created
this rule:
rule Active risk
when
$n:Node()
$readings: ArrayList(size==80) from collect(
Reading( nodeID == $n.nodeID,
(signalType == SignalType.PLUVIOSITY value = 10)||
(signalType == SignalType.AIR_TEMPERATURE value=12)
) over window:time(10h))
then
System.out.println(Active risk in node + $n.getNodeID());
end
And the declarations are the following (Reading and Node are java classes):
declare Reading
@role(event)
@timestamp (timestamp)
end
declare Node
@role(fact)
end
Well, I have probe the rule. I have inserted 100 readings which satisfy the
conditions, in a single time but with different timestamp (I have simulated
that there are a pluviosity reading and a air_temperature reading each 15
minutes), that is, in main:
long init= 129072960L;
long interval = 1000*60*15;
for (int i=0; i100; i++){
long fecha = init+i*interval;
Reading r1 = new Reading(SignalType.PLUVIOSITY, value1, node);
session.insert(r1);
Reading r2 = new Reading(SignalType.AIR_TEMPERATURE, value1, node);
session.insert(r2);
}
The message is not written (I have fired rules after insertions).
My questions:
Has drools any problem if I inserted all readings at same time? (Do I have
to use the pseudo-clock?)
My problem is that the readings will be sent from a server in real system,
and it's possible that the server will send all readings belonging to an
interval of one/two hour/s at same time.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-collect-and-sliding-windows-tp1999562p1999562.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0
Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file. I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository. So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a classloader issue? Chris On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote: A closer look: On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote: I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well? However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing. -W ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
IIRC, there's something in drools-spring we can do, so the xsd's don't
have to be downloaded from the internet but can be used directly from
the jar.
It might be a properties file or something in the jar, which says urlX =
pathYinTheJar.
Op 01-12-10 15:59, Anderson Rocha schreef:
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml
like this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
file:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
file:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have
some unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com mailto:sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rocha anderson.u...@gmail.com
mailto:anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be
conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a
way to download the tags of Drools and configure the
applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Question about collect and sliding windows
A sliding window requires the use of STREAM mode, and you must use a
session clock, pseudo or real-time.
I'm also a worried about size==80; shouldn't you use size = 80?
But this depends on the way you run the session; are you doing this
with fireUntilHalt in a separate thread?
It shouldn't be a problem if the session is run with a real-time clock and
delayed events (with the timestamp in the data, as you apparently have)
arrive and are inserted. Docs say that that this is OK, as long as events
are inserted in each entry-point in chronological order. If there are
different streams, each with individual delays, you may have to use
multiple entry-points.
On 1 December 2010 16:10, Anais Martinez amarti...@iti.upv.es wrote:
Hello. I have two questions about collect and sliding windows. I have
created
this rule:
rule Active risk
when
$n:Node()
$readings: ArrayList(size==80) from collect(
Reading( nodeID == $n.nodeID,
(signalType == SignalType.PLUVIOSITY value = 10)||
(signalType == SignalType.AIR_TEMPERATURE value=12)
) over window:time(10h))
then
System.out.println(Active risk in node + $n.getNodeID());
end
And the declarations are the following (Reading and Node are java classes):
declare Reading
@role(event)
@timestamp (timestamp)
end
declare Node
@role(fact)
end
Well, I have probe the rule. I have inserted 100 readings which satisfy the
conditions, in a single time but with different timestamp (I have simulated
that there are a pluviosity reading and a air_temperature reading each 15
minutes), that is, in main:
long init= 129072960L;
long interval = 1000*60*15;
for (int i=0; i100; i++){
long fecha = init+i*interval;
Reading r1 = new Reading(SignalType.PLUVIOSITY, value1, node);
session.insert(r1);
Reading r2 = new Reading(SignalType.AIR_TEMPERATURE, value1, node);
session.insert(r2);
}
The message is not written (I have fired rules after insertions).
My questions:
Has drools any problem if I inserted all readings at same time? (Do I have
to use the pseudo-clock?)
My problem is that the readings will be sent from a server in real system,
and it's possible that the server will send all readings belonging to an
interval of one/two hour/s at same time.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-collect-and-sliding-windows-tp1999562p1999562.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
I had the same issue at startup (i.e. not connected to the internet).
Anyway, I used the XSD files are bundled in the drools-spring-5.1.1.jar. I
simply changed my application context schema location to
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring.xsd; and the XSD files are loaded
from the jar file at startup.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Corneil du Plessis corn...@tsctech.comwrote:
change schema location to that is only contains filenames like
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beansspring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring camel-spring.xsd
Then put the xsd files in same folder as applicationContext.xml
On 01/12/2010 17:15, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
IIRC, there's something in drools-spring we can do, so the xsd's don't
have to be downloaded from the internet but can be used directly from
the jar.
It might be a properties file or something in the jar, which says urlX =
pathYinTheJar.
Op 01-12-10 15:59, Anderson Rocha schreef:
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml
like this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
file:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
file:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have
some unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatinosala...@gmail.commailto:sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rochaanderson.u...@gmail.com
mailto:anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be
conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a
way to download the tags of Drools and configure the
applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Problem deploying Drools V5 as a webservice on Weblogic 10
Hello, I am trying to migrate an application of my company from Drools V4.0.7 to V5.1.1 (without actually using features brought by v5), and I am currently experiencing a problem. The application is called via an Axis web service deployed on a Weblogic 10 server, using JDK v1.5.0_14. I have two ways to test the application: - A simple java class that sets the facts and calls directly the implemented method of the web service - Using soapUI, after having deployed the .war file of my web service on my Weblogic server. While in V4, everything works fine, java test and web service test (with SoapUI) alike, I get the expected results. With V5, the Java test works as expected, but the web service test fails (I get a java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException without any StackTrace). I put the server in debug mode and tried to narrow down the problem in eclipse the best I could. The first difference I noticed, was that the classloader was different between the two test methods: - for the java test: Launcher$AppClassLoader - for the WS test: ChangeAwareClassLoader However, I don't really know how it affects the execution. After debugging deeper into the code, I found out the difference: at some point (see stack below) it seems to get the wrong referent from Reference.class. In the java test, the referent is an ObjectStreamClass, whereas in the web service test, it becomes a NoClassDefFoundError... Where could that come from ? Does it have something to do with the ClassLoader (I admit this area is out of the bounds of my coding skills) ? For more details, here is the stack from my java test (some lines excluded) : ObjectStreamClass.lookup(Class, boolean) line: 261 ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass, Class, ClassNotFoundException, ObjectStreamClass) line: 531 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readNonProxyDesc(boolean) line: 1552 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readClassDesc(boolean) line: 1466 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readOrdinaryObject(boolean) line: 1699 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject0(boolean) line: 1305 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject() line: 348 HashMapK,V.readObject(ObjectInputStream) line: 1067 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 39 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 25 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 585 ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(Object, ObjectInputStream) line: 946 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readSerialData(Object, ObjectStreamClass) line: 1809 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readOrdinaryObject(boolean) line: 1719 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject0(boolean) line: 1305 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject() line: 348 DialectRuntimeRegistry.readExternal(ObjectInput) line: 59 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readExternalData(Externalizable, ObjectStreamClass) line: 1755 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readOrdinaryObject(boolean) line: 1717 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject0(boolean) line: 1305 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject() line: 348 Package.readExternal(ObjectInput) line: 197 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readExternalData(Externalizable, ObjectStreamClass) line: 1755 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readOrdinaryObject(boolean) line: 1717 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject0(boolean) line: 1305 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject() line: 348 DroolsStreamUtils.streamIn(InputStream, ClassLoader, boolean) line: 205 DroolsStreamUtils.streamIn(InputStream) line: 174 FileScanner.readPackage(File) line: 147 FileScanner.getChangeSet() line: 97 FileScanner.loadPackageChanges() line: 72 DirectoryScanner.loadPackageChanges() line: 85 And here is the stack, at the same point, from my web service (difference in bold) : ObjectStreamClass.lookup(Class, boolean) line: 261 ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass, Class, ClassNotFoundException, ObjectStreamClass) line: 531 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readNonProxyDesc(boolean) line: 1552 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readClassDesc(boolean) line: 1466 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readOrdinaryObject(boolean) line: 1699 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject0(boolean) line: 1305 DroolsObjectInputStream(ObjectInputStream).readObject() line: 348 HashMapK,V.readObject(ObjectInputStream) line: 1067 GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: not available DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 25 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 585
[rules-users] scoping spring beans
Hello, I wonder, if some spring drools expert guy help me to set the ksession bean's bean scope like below. drools:ksession kbase=kbase1 type=stateless id=stateless property scope=prototype/ /drools:ksession Any help will be highly appriciated Thanks, Rav Think green - keep it on the screen. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
Corneil, that's an imperfect solution because that your IDE won't find
the xsd's automatically and give you code completion.
The perfect solution IIRC is:
- use the full http...xsd reference in your xmls (just like you do for
other spring schema's)
- write a patch for drools-spring so it has a properties file to tell
spring which http...xsd maps to which xsd resource on the classpath
Op 01-12-10 16:21, Corneil du Plessis schreef:
change schema location to that is only contains filenames like
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
spring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring camel-spring.xsd
Then put the xsd files in same folder as applicationContext.xml
On 01/12/2010 17:15, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
IIRC, there's something in drools-spring we can do, so the xsd's don't
have to be downloaded from the internet but can be used directly from
the jar.
It might be a properties file or something in the jar, which says urlX =
pathYinTheJar.
Op 01-12-10 15:59, Anderson Rocha schreef:
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml
like this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
file:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
file:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have
some unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatinosala...@gmail.commailto:sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rochaanderson.u...@gmail.com
mailto:anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be
conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a
way to download the tags of Drools and configure the
applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Question about collect and sliding windows
On 1 December 2010 17:19, Anais Martinez amarti...@iti.upv.es wrote:
What does your thread do after it returns from fireAllRules?
My thread sleeps five minutes and then it fires again: (intervalLength =
5*60*1000):
You might as well let the Engine sleep, waiting for news.
If you turn it on, every now and then, you'll get all sorts of delays. Say,
an event arrives 1ms after you've returned from an unsuccessful
fireAllRules()
(there's no fireRules() method, is there?), then you won't get any
reaction
until next time round, i.e., 5 minutes later. This may not be as expected.
Regards
-W
@Override
public void run(){
while(!end){
try {
Thread.sleep(intervalLength);
int nRules = ksession.fireRules();
if(nRules 0){
logger.debug(nRules + reglas disparadas.);
}
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.error(e);
}
}
}
Well, if the events arrive on schedule it should be OK, but what about the
delayed arrivals?
Ah, ok...
Thank you, again.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-collect-and-sliding-windows-tp1999562p277.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
The key is probably in this file:
drools/drools-container/drools-spring/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.schemas
Op 01-12-10 17:45, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
Corneil, that's an imperfect solution because that your IDE won't find
the xsd's automatically and give you code completion.
The perfect solution IIRC is:
- use the full http...xsd reference in your xmls (just like you do for
other spring schema's)
- write a patch for drools-spring so it has a properties file to tell
spring which http...xsd maps to which xsd resource on the classpath
Op 01-12-10 16:21, Corneil du Plessis schreef:
change schema location to that is only contains filenames like
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
spring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring camel-spring.xsd
Then put the xsd files in same folder as applicationContext.xml
On 01/12/2010 17:15, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
IIRC, there's something in drools-spring we can do, so the xsd's don't
have to be downloaded from the internet but can be used directly from
the jar.
It might be a properties file or something in the jar, which says urlX =
pathYinTheJar.
Op 01-12-10 15:59, Anderson Rocha schreef:
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml
like this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
file:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
file:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have
some unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] {applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatinosala...@gmail.commailto:sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rochaanderson.u...@gmail.com
mailto:anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be
conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a
way to download the tags of Drools and configure the
applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools + Spring without internet
Thank you all. I will try some of these solutions later, and post the results.
2010/12/1, Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com:
The key is probably in this file:
drools/drools-container/drools-spring/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.schemas
Op 01-12-10 17:45, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
Corneil, that's an imperfect solution because that your IDE won't find
the xsd's automatically and give you code completion.
The perfect solution IIRC is:
- use the full http...xsd reference in your xmls (just like you do for
other spring schema's)
- write a patch for drools-spring so it has a properties file to tell
spring which http...xsd maps to which xsd resource on the classpath
Op 01-12-10 16:21, Corneil du Plessis schreef:
change schema location to that is only contains filenames like
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
spring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring camel-spring.xsd
Then put the xsd files in same folder as applicationContext.xml
On 01/12/2010 17:15, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
IIRC, there's something in drools-spring we can do, so the xsd's don't
have to be downloaded from the internet but can be used directly from
the jar.
It might be a properties file or something in the jar, which says urlX =
pathYinTheJar.
Op 01-12-10 15:59, Anderson Rocha schreef:
Thank you for your replay.
I downloaded the schemas and configured the applicationContext.xml
like this, consider path to my the path to the file.
beans xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:drools=http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring;
xmlns:camel=http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
*http://drools.org/schema/drools-spring
file:///path/to/my/drools-spring-1.0.0.xsd*
*http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
file:///path/to/my/camel-spring.xsd*
I have a web application, and when I execute it works =) but I have
some unit tests and I initialize the spring with the code
ApplicationContext applicationContext = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[]
{applicationContext.xml});
In this case I get the same error I had before. Any ideia?
Anderson
2010/12/1 Mauricio
Salatinosala...@gmail.commailto:sala...@gmail.com
yes you can download the schemas to your hard drive and point
the
applicationContext.xml to them.
2010/12/1 Anderson Rochaanderson.u...@gmail.com
mailto:anderson.u...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I realized that to use Drools with Spring I need to be
conected to the internet, but sometimes I am not. There is a
way to download the tags of Drools and configure the
applicationContext.xml to seek for them localy?
Regards,
Anderson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.orgmailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Enviado do meu celular
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] @role( event ) in guvnor
Message: 3 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:16:05 -0800 (PST) From: Pankaj Khattar pankaj.khatt...@alcatel-lucent.com Subject: Re: [rules-users] @role( event ) in guvnor To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Message-ID: 1291112165767-1991857.p...@n3.nabble.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks for the info. Is there any workaround for the same as i am migerating my existing drl file to guvnor the drl file contains @role( event ) @expires( 5m ) -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/role-event-in-guvnor -tp1991538p1991857.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Pankaj, Try this - go into Guvnor and create a technical rule. Clear out the WHEN-THEN (i.e. make it blank). In the rule editor, type: declare factName @role(event) @expires(5m) end It should validate without any problems. I think this might solve your problem. The other thing I discovered is that the Guided Editor won't support entry-points, but you can use the Technical Editor for it, or you can try to put the verbiage in the DSL translations. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)
Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it. The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model /and/ a function in my rules. It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's presence is enough to cause the problem. Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of another rule will not fire. I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have experienced the problem. Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch? If I create a real Java class and upload it in a jar file to the Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the problem does not happen. This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to have to do this. Chris Selwyn On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote: Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file. I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository. So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a classloader issue? Chris On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote: A closer look: On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote: I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well? However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing. -W ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)
Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits) is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1. Thanks. Tihomir On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote: Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it. The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model /and/ a function in my rules. It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's presence is enough to cause the problem. Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of another rule will not fire. I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have experienced the problem. Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch? If I create a real Java class and upload it in a jar file to the Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the problem does not happen. This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to have to do this. Chris Selwyn On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote: Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file. I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository. So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a classloader issue? Chris On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote: A closer look: On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote: I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: thread-pool-1; w: 7;| OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, state=Closed, question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well? However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java by using kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then the Test rule gets fired just fine. That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing. -W ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)
Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that it
is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2140.
That entry has a repro.
I am interested as to what you mean by right around the corner?
Here is a repro anyway...
QUOTE
package rulestest
global java.util.logging.Logger logger
declare QuestionValidation
question: String
mandatory: Boolean
state: String
type: String
end
function void testfunc() {
System.out.println(testfunc called);
}
rule 'init'
dialect mvel
when
eval(true)
then
QuestionValidation qv = new QuestionValidation();
qv.setState(ss);
qv.setQuestion(qq);
insert(qv);
logger.info(Hello world);
end
rule 'test'
dialect mvel
when
$qv: QuestionValidation()
then
logger.info(Found a qv + $qv);
end
/QUOTE
If the testfunc is present then the test rule never fires. If it is
not present then the test rule fires just fine.
Chris
On 01/12/2010 21:47, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo
that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits)
is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the
issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it.
The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model
/and/ a function in my rules.
It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's
presence is enough to cause the problem.
Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the
declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of
another rule will not fire.
I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I
have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since
downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have
experienced the problem.
Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch?
If I create a real Java class and upload it in a jar file to the
Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the
problem does not happen.
This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to
have to do this.
Chris Selwyn
On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the
package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file.
I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so
far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class
SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the
ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository.
So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a
classloader issue?
Chris
On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A closer look:
On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk
mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote:
I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows
[#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p:
thread-pool-1; w: 7;|
OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true,
state=Closed,
question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#]
Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well?
However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java
by using
kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then
the Test
rule gets fired just fine.
That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)
On 12/1/10 5:09 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that
it is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2140.
That entry has a repro.
thanks for finding
I am interested as to what you mean by right around the corner?
this month
Here is a repro anyway...
QUOTE
package rulestest
global java.util.logging.Logger logger
declare QuestionValidation
question: String
mandatory: Boolean
state: String
type: String
end
function void testfunc() {
System.out.println(testfunc called);
}
rule 'init'
dialect mvel
when
eval(true)
then
QuestionValidation qv = new QuestionValidation();
qv.setState(ss);
qv.setQuestion(qq);
insert(qv);
logger.info(Hello world);
end
rule 'test'
dialect mvel
when
$qv: QuestionValidation()
then
logger.info(Found a qv + $qv);
end
/QUOTE
If the testfunc is present then the test rule never fires. If it is
not present then the test rule fires just fine.
Chris
On 01/12/2010 21:47, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo
that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits)
is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the
issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom
of it.
The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact
model /and/ a function in my rules.
It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's
presence is enough to cause the problem.
Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the
declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of
another rule will not fire.
I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I
have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since
downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have
experienced the problem.
Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch?
If I create a real Java class and upload it in a jar file to the
Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the
problem does not happen.
This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not
to have to do this.
Chris Selwyn
On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the
package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file.
I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so
far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class
SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the
ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository.
So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a
classloader issue?
Chris
On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A closer look:
On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk
mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote:
I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows
[#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p:
thread-pool-1; w: 7;|
OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true,
state=Closed,
question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#]
Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well?
However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java
by using
kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation) then
the Test
rule gets fired just fine.
That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)
On 12/1/10 6:04 PM, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
On 12/1/10 5:09 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that
it is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2140.
Fix for JBRULES-2140 https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2140 will
be included in the next release of the supported bits (5.1). Since you
already are using supported bits I assume you know where to check for
updates.
If you cannot upgrade, open a ticket with JBoss support and request a
backport fix.
That entry has a repro.
thanks for finding
I am interested as to what you mean by right around the corner?
this month
Here is a repro anyway...
QUOTE
package rulestest
global java.util.logging.Logger logger
declare QuestionValidation
question: String
mandatory: Boolean
state: String
type: String
end
function void testfunc() {
System.out.println(testfunc called);
}
rule 'init'
dialect mvel
when
eval(true)
then
QuestionValidation qv = new QuestionValidation();
qv.setState(ss);
qv.setQuestion(qq);
insert(qv);
logger.info(Hello world);
end
rule 'test'
dialect mvel
when
$qv: QuestionValidation()
then
logger.info(Found a qv + $qv);
end
/QUOTE
If the testfunc is present then the test rule never fires. If it is
not present then the test rule fires just fine.
Chris
On 01/12/2010 21:47, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo
that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported
bits) is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if
the issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom
of it.
The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact
model /and/ a function in my rules.
It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's
presence is enough to cause the problem.
Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the
declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of
another rule will not fire.
I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I
have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since
downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have
experienced the problem.
Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch?
If I create a real Java class and upload it in a jar file to the
Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the
problem does not happen.
This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not
to have to do this.
Chris Selwyn
On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote:
Yes the package is SWWB2BOutgoing but it looks as though the
package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file.
I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so
far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the
class SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation in the
ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository.
So my current question is How is this possible? Is it maybe a
classloader issue?
Chris
On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A closer look:
On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk
mailto:ch...@selwyn-family.me.uk wrote:
I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows
[#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p:
thread-pool-1; w: 7;|
OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true,
state=Closed,
question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#]
Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well?
However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in
Java by using
kbase.getFactType(SWWB2BOutgoing, QuestionValidation)
then the Test
rule gets fired just fine.
That is, apparently SWWB2BOutgoing.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date:
11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
No virus found in
Re: [rules-users] Task Server as Jboss Service
That's interesting and important as well, I'll give a try with HornetQ... There's any sample configuration? Which WorkItemHandler must be used... Thanks 2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com Hmm it really depends on your scenario. Mina doesn't have message realibility and a lot of things that HornetQ provides. But If you are OK with Mina you can use it. 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com No, I didn't, I just saw some sources in the drools-process-task module. I preferred to go with what is in the documentation, wondering that Mina transport is the recommended approach. 2010/12/1 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com did you try the HornetQ integration? The main idea was to create a transport agnostic TaskServer, so for each implementation you can choose between different technologies depending on the situation. I'm not sure if there is another effort for this kind of deployment.. if no one else answer this mail feel free to propose and contribute with your ideas. Greetings 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com If there's no other way/plans to deploy it, even using HornetQ integration, I'll be more than happy to contribute! 2010/11/30 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com I think that your idea would be a great contribution! 2010/11/30 Cristiano Nicolai cristiano.nico...@gmail.com Hi guys, I think that would be great if we could deploy the TaskServer (MinaTaskServer) as a JbossMC bean, making possible to administer it using admin-console. There's any work in this way or other plans to deploy this component? Thanks. -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Best regards, Cristiano Nicolai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] @role( event ) in guvnor
Thanks for the info. The approach works good except when i try to use sliding window on the fact name in the rule. for example: import com.drools.service.AlertReceivedEvent; declare AlertReceivedEvent @role(event) end rule Delay Alert no-loop true dialect mvel lock-on-active when AlertReceivedEvent( //condition) over window:time(90s) from entry-point NotificationStream then // code to be executed end when i try to validate this rule in guvnor then it gives me error as [Delay Alert] A Sliding Window behavior can only be assigned to patterns declared with @role( event ). The pattern '[ClassObjectType class=com.alu.ae.ais.smp.fm.drools.service.AlertReceivedEvent]' in the rule 'Delay Alert' is not declared as an Event. please suggest. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/role-event-in-guvnor-tp1991538p2004356.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
