putting $var: user.?manager.name to avoid nullpointer in the business rule
defeats the purpose of a sanity check upfront, as execution should fail if
the relation is empty.
Nullpointers are not an elegant way to fail, and the stack trace gives no
clue in which rule the error occurred.
I was
Hello,
Yesterday I wanted to upgrade my drools version to 5.3 (from 5.1). I got
the exception java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
de/pelle7/testpackage/event/myEvent (wrong name:
de/pelle7/testpackage/event/MyEvent) while adding my resources.
I removed the import wildcards and the error
This has been already reported:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741219
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741287
This happens for Guvnor's PKG, XLS, DRF and I guess CSV too. You'll find
test cases there.
Jiri Svitak
On 10/25/2011 12:07 AM, Michael Anstis wrote:
Thanks
Hi,
I have added a subprocess to the flow, but the exception still occurs:
Caused by: [Error: null pointer or function not found: getName]
[Near : {... manager.getName().equals(tes }]
Would anyone have suggestions or know about best practices for handling this
kind of scenario?
Thanks
--
Hi W et al.,
I came up with a following solution.
One reason why I came up with this kind of solution is that it is not firing
every time when there comes a temperature reading (ZZZBean) in the system
(working memory).
Would you comment if this solution is viable and if there are any pitfalls ?
I'm trying to upgrade from drools 5.2.0 to 5.3.0 and having some
difficulties with the planner benchmark.
I'd like to make a set of move factories common to all local search solvers,
by adding them to inheritedSolverBenchmark block. But it seems that the
localSearch environment always requires a
Per,
This looks like a bug. Can you please open a JIRA for it with the
information on this e-mail?
Thank you,
Edson
2011/10/25 Per Sterner pelle...@yahoo.de
Hello,
Yesterday I wanted to upgrade my drools version to 5.3 (from 5.1). I got
the exception
Anybody?
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Swindells, Thomas
Sent: 21 October 2011 14:49
To: Rules Users List (rules-users@lists.jboss.org)
Subject: [rules-users] WorkingMemoryLogger + statelessSessions = memory leak?
Hi
I get the following exception when i try to solve and don't know if i didn't
set something properly on my side or if there is a bug in the planner.
After debugging, seems like cachedPlanningValues in PlanningValueCreator is
being created as an empty collection and when PlanningValueWalker gets
Hi,
I was using drools 5.2.0 in my grails 2.0.0.M2 application. I use Drools
expert to execute a .drl file I have. The three dependencies that I have set
up for this to work was:
runtime 'org.drools:drools-core:5.2.0.Final'
runtime 'org.drools:drools-compiler:5.2.0.Final'
I assume you replaced both drools-core and drools-compiler with those for
5.3?
Furthermore, you should endeavour to use knowledge-api which contains the
public API.
Can you isolate the rules from grail, to understand if it is an integration
issue too?
On 25 October 2011 20:04, arrehman
Hi manstis,
I will look into incorporating knowledge-api jar and try. Thanks.
Anywhere these dependencies are documented clearly?
The issue is clearly drools related, i have isolated this already in another
git branch meant only for drools upgrade.
Abdul
--
View this message in context:
I have included knowledge-api.jar thats not working
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-0-Dependencies-tp3452346p3452445.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Yes locally in machine just to make sure i have only drools upgrade
happening. My issues are because of this upgrade guaranteed.
The error message drools is giving me is misleading:
service.RulesService Error executing drools rules Unexpected global
[dateService]
No stacktrace, nothing :o
Abdul
I think you are going to need to provide some code and rule definitions to
help solve your problem.
sent on the move
On 25 Oct 2011 21:22, arrehman arrehma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes locally in machine just to make sure i have only drools upgrade
happening. My issues are because of this upgrade
Each item I am testing MAY have overridden the default thresholds or disable
the rule entirely. I would prefer to have this data related to the item I
am testing rather than have each rule manage customized behavior for
thousands of different types of objects.
The object could have a map of
Zack,
The use of rule names as part of your logic (LHS) is a bad practice (as
you noticed already) for many reasons. I discussed this yesterday during my
presentation at the Rules Fest... I will make the presentation available
later this week.
I think the problem is that you are mixing
17 matches
Mail list logo
