AFAIK it fixes various regressions, but we have a reasonably complex
dependency hierarchy so user-beware.
sent on the move
On 17 Mar 2012 01:06, "julia" wrote:
> Great Will MVEL 2.1.0.drools9.jar work with guvnor5.3?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com
Great Will MVEL 2.1.0.drools9.jar work with guvnor5.3?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Using-Character-typed-properties-in-Drool-5-3-tp3741968p3833621.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
I believe Mario is also releasing another version of MVEL on Monday, but
drools9 might contain fixes for Characters.
sent on the move
On 17 Mar 2012 00:13, "Edson Tirelli" wrote:
>
> Try updating to MVEL 2.1.0.drools9.jar that Mario released a few days
> ago. There are many fixes in there.
Try updating to MVEL 2.1.0.drools9.jar that Mario released a few days
ago. There are many fixes in there.
Edson
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, julia wrote:
> Edson,
> any word from Mario on how to get around this problem?
>
> We are importing a lot of POJOs with Character setters/gett
Edson,
any word from Mario on how to get around this problem?
We are importing a lot of POJOs with Character setters/getters. I would hate
to rewrite them all to Strings just to be able to work with Guvnor. Any
advice would be appreciated.
thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools
Converted my existing Java project to a Drools Project using eclipse and
debugging as a Drools application, as before, didnt work, however when I
created a new Drools project and debugging the standard DroolsTest.java and
sample.drl that is created when creating a new Drools project then I am able
Wolfgang's answer is spot on. Pretend that you are not using an
engine... imagine that you are implementing a java method in a java
application to handle this use case... how would you do it? Either you use
the timestamp at the source or the timestamp at the engine. Either you
execute your actio
This is the repo you should use:
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/
Best Regards,
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Sujit Biswas wrote:
Hi
I am trying to make use of drools 5.2.0.Final jars , I tried the following
repository in the pom
jboss-public-repository-group
JBoss Public Repository Group
http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/
the above repository does seems
The Decision Table parser only adds the Fact type to the generated rule if
it has at least one constraint.
There is a workaround (although I've not tried it):-
CONDITION | CONDITION | CONDITION | ACTION
--
Hi,
thanks for your responses. You right but, why is it? I mean, rules are
receiving two facts(one Customer instance and one Tariff instance) and I
need to set the customer offer value even when I am not checking any
condition on the customer. Is it not possible? Is there any workaround?
Thanks.
The problem is RULE2 does not create a Customer pattern as you do not
specify at least one constraint.
CONDITION CONDITION ACTION
Customer cTariff t customer.setOffer($param)
name value
RULE1 "pepe
For which customer would you like to call setOffer()? If it isn't selected
by the condition part you cannot use it in the action part.
-W
On 16 March 2012 13:26, Zeta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my spreedsheet received 4 facts. I need all of them to check conditions but
> not all of them are used in al
Hi all,
my spreedsheet received 4 facts. I need all of them to check conditions but
not all of them are used in all rules. There are some rules that modify a
fact which is not used in any of the conditions and thus, it is not
"declared" on the left side of the rule.
Let me show you an example:
Yes, to debug etc it needs to be a Drools Project and you need to "Debug as
Drools Application" when launching.
On 16 March 2012 11:27, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> So someone in the know please tell us: would this cause Devan's problems?
> -W
>
>
> On 16 March 2012 12:24, devan.vanree...@gmail.com <
So someone in the know please tell us: would this cause Devan's problems?
-W
On 16 March 2012 12:24, devan.vanree...@gmail.com wrote:
> Its a Java project.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Eclipse-debug-views-Audit-Agenda-Working-Memory-etc-tp3831
Its a Java project.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Eclipse-debug-views-Audit-Agenda-Working-Memory-etc-tp3831318p3831559.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users
Just a wild guess (born out of ignorance): Is the project where this
happens a Drools project or just a Java project?
-W
On 16 March 2012 11:32, devan.vanree...@gmail.com wrote:
> Using 5.2.1
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Eclipse-debug-views-Au
Using 5.2.1
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Eclipse-debug-views-Audit-Agenda-Working-Memory-etc-tp3831318p3831453.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing
I am using 5.2.1
tx
2012/3/16 Michael Anstis :
> What version of the Eclipse plugin are you using?
>
>
> On 16 March 2012 09:29, devan.vanree...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Help needed pls.
>> I have read previous threads from this forum on not being able to see any
>> content on Dr
What version of the Eclipse plugin are you using?
On 16 March 2012 09:29, devan.vanree...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Help needed pls.
> I have read previous threads from this forum on not being able to see any
> content on Drools Eclipse debug views - Audit, Agenda, Working Memory, etc
> w
Hi there,
Help needed pls.
I have read previous threads from this forum on not being able to see any
content on Drools Eclipse debug views - Audit, Agenda, Working Memory, etc
when debugging rules and still cant seem to get this working
I have tried the following suggestions
I inspect my state
I guess the engine use the insert fact timestamp and not the annotated
timestamp for the non-existence of a event. Think it would not be easy to
implement the engine, because you need to take care of past and future
events. And for past events, both the events where the trigger did not pass
yet and
23 matches
Mail list logo
