[rules-users] Problem in deploying GUNVOR
Hi all,I am trying to deploy GUVNOR 5.4.0 on TOMCAT 6.0.35 but I met the
following error:
11-lug-2012 8.44.17 org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
INFO: The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path:
C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\windows\Sun\Java\bin;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\Program
Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.8\miktex\bin;C:\Program Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\Program
Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\FUNCTION;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\SAMPLES\REPL;C:\Program
Files (x86)\Kaspersky Lab\Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8 for
Windows\;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenVPN\bin;.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.SetPropertiesRule begin
AVVERTENZA: [SetPropertiesRule]{Server/Service/Engine/Host/Context} Setting
property 'source' to 'org.eclipse.jst.jee.server:Test' did not find a matching
property.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 683 ms
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Catalina
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.35
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Error listenerStart
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Context [/guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0] startup failed due to previous
errors
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor host-manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory docs
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory examples
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory ROOT
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start
INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/34 config=null
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 5476 ms
I read several posts suggesting to remove jars from WEB-INF/lib.
I tried to do that, but the result does not change.
Could anyone help me?
Thanks in advance,Elena
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] How to write Hibernate query lang(HQL) in .DRL file
Hi Laune, We are tried to created similar scenario in which we get error when we tried to execute HQL from DRL file but unfortunately , i m sorry we r unable to give you exact what error we are getting. But it will be great if you can share your approach or process in calling hibernate query directly in DRL file. How to pass hibernate session and execute query if we can run simple select query from their , then we can go for complex nested queries. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-Hibernate-query-lang-HQL-in-DRL-file-tp4018571p4018580.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Deploy ModeShape to Tomcat issue (Guvnor 5.4.0 Final)
From one of the modeshape authors, who I forwarded this email to: The correct way to use ModeShape within Tomcat is to just copy the JARs and include it in your deployment, just as you've been doing. In this way, you're embedding ModeShape into your web application. The three modeshape-* files you cite below are used only when installing ModeShape into JBoss AS (as a service within JBoss AS), and are not needed in Tomcat (or any other servlet container). Mark On 09/07/2012 15:56, yan.d.zh...@accenture.com wrote: Hi, In order to trying connect Guvnor to DB2, I am trying another JCR modeshape instead of jackrabbit. I downloaded modeshape-2.8.1.Final, and I am using Tomcat 6.0.x. My first question is, should I just copy some of modeshape jar in /lib directory (I currently do), or I should install it as a service in Tomcat? Second quesion, If I have to install it, how can I do that? Besides, I am not able to find the modeshape-service.jar in 'modeshape-2.8.1.Final' which is mentioned in the Guvnor manual, therefore I am also not able to locate and modify the following files: - modeshape-roles.properties - modeshape-users.properties - modeshape-services.jar/modeshape-config.xml Is it because I didn't install it as a service? Any help or instruction will be appreciated. Thank you, Yan Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates including telephone calls and emails (including content), may be monitored by our systems for the purposes of security and the assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. __ www.accenture.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Problem in deploying GUNVOR
Have you tried 5.4.0.Final?
The log below suggests you are using 5.4.0.CR1.
On 11 July 2012 07:53, elena_nard...@libero.it elena_nard...@libero.itwrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to deploy GUVNOR 5.4.0 on TOMCAT 6.0.35 but I met the
following error:
11-lug-2012 8.44.17 org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
INFO: The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
performance in production environments was not found on the
java.library.path: C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\windows\Sun\Java\bin;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\Program
Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.8\miktex\bin;C:\Program Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\Program
Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\FUNCTION;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\SAMPLES\REPL;C:\Program
Files (x86)\Kaspersky Lab\Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8 for
Windows\;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenVPN\bin;.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.SetPropertiesRule begin
AVVERTENZA: [SetPropertiesRule]{Server/Service/Engine/Host/Context}
Setting property 'source' to 'org.eclipse.jst.jee.server:Test' did not find
a matching property.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 683 ms
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Catalina
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.35
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Error listenerStart
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Context [/guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0] startup failed due to
previous errors
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor host-manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory docs
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory examples
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory ROOT
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start
INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/34 config=null
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 5476 ms
I read several posts suggesting to remove jars from WEB-INF/lib.
I tried to do that, but the result does not change.
Could anyone help me?
Thanks in advance,
Elena
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] R: Re: Problem in deploying GUNVOR
5.4.0 Final works!
Thanks a lot!
Elena
Messaggio originale
Da: michael.ans...@gmail.com
Data: 11/07/2012 10.41
A: elena_nard...@libero.itelena_nard...@libero.it, Rules Users
Listrules-users@lists.jboss.org
Ogg: Re: [rules-users] Problem in deploying GUNVOR
Have you tried 5.4.0.Final?
The log below suggests you are using 5.4.0.CR1.
On 11 July 2012 07:53, elena_nard...@libero.it elena_nard...@libero.it wrote:
Hi all,I am trying to deploy GUVNOR 5.4.0 on TOMCAT 6.0.35 but I met the
following error:
11-lug-2012 8.44.17 org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
INFO: The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path:
C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\windows\Sun\Java\bin;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\Program
Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.8\miktex\bin;C:\Program Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\Program
Files\Internet
Explorer;C:\windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\windows\system32;C:\windows;C:\windows\System32\wbem;C:\windows\SysWOW64\;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\FUNCTION;C:\PROGRA~2\IBM\SQLLIB\SAMPLES\REPL;C:\Program
Files (x86)\Kaspersky Lab\Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8 for
Windows\;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files
(x86)\Java\jre6\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenVPN\bin;.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.SetPropertiesRule begin
AVVERTENZA: [SetPropertiesRule]{Server/Service/Engine/Host/Context} Setting
property 'source' to 'org.eclipse.jst.jee.server:Test' did not find a matching
property.
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 683 ms
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Catalina
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.35
11-lug-2012 8.44.18 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Error listenerStart
11-lug-2012 8.44.22 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
GRAVE: Context [/guvnor-5.4.0.CR1-tomcat-6.0] startup failed due to previous
errors
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor host-manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDescriptor
INFO: Deploying configuration descriptor manager.xml
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory docs
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory examples
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application directory ROOT
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start
INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/34 config=null
11-lug-2012 8.44.23 org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 5476 ms
I read several posts suggesting to remove jars from WEB-INF/lib.
I tried to do that, but the result does not change.
Could anyone help me?
Thanks in advance,
Elena
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Error occured when replacing commons-lang2.4 with commons-lang3-3.1 in Guvnor 5.4.0 Final
Hi, All I am using Guvnor 5.4.0 Final with Tomcat 6.0.35. And I wanted to replace commons-lang2.4 with commons- lang3-3.1, so I overwrote the commons-lang2.4 jar file in Guvnor's WEB-INF/lib directory with commons- lang3-3.1.jar. However an error like follows occured: Service method 'public abstract long org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.AssetService.getAssetCount(org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.AssetPageRequest) throws com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException' threw an unexpected exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils I have restarted Guvnor. Any suggestion will be appreciated, thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-occured-when-replacing-commons-lang2-4-with-commons-lang3-3-1-in-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-tp4018584.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Error occured when replacing commons-lang2.4 with commons-lang3-3.1 in Guvnor 5.4.0 Final
The class required by Guvnor, org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils, doesn't exist in 3-3.1. It has been renamed org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils in 3-3.1. On 11 July 2012 12:15, chrisLi shengtao0...@163.com wrote: Hi, All I am using Guvnor 5.4.0 Final with Tomcat 6.0.35. And I wanted to replace commons-lang2.4 with commons- lang3-3.1, so I overwrote the commons-lang2.4 jar file in Guvnor's WEB-INF/lib directory with commons- lang3-3.1.jar. However an error like follows occured: Service method 'public abstract long org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.AssetService.getAssetCount(org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.AssetPageRequest) throws com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException' threw an unexpected exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils I have restarted Guvnor. Any suggestion will be appreciated, thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-occured-when-replacing-commons-lang2-4-with-commons-lang3-3-1-in-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-tp4018584.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Error occured when replacing commons-lang2.4 with commons-lang3-3.1 in Guvnor 5.4.0 Final
oops！I have not noticed this change. Thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-occured-when-replacing-commons-lang2-4-with-commons-lang3-3-1-in-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-tp4018584p4018586.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Error occured when replacing commons-lang2.4 with commons-lang3-3.1 in Guvnor 5.4.0 Final
commons-lang 3 isn't backwards compatible with commons-lang 2 (hence the major version number change). But if they namespaced all the lang 3 work under lang3 (and also namespaces the maven GAV), then both a 2 and 3 jar can be in the classpath together. Not sure if that's the case though... Op 11-07-12 13:29, chrisLi schreef: oops！I have not noticed this change. Thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-occured-when-replacing-commons-lang2-4-with-commons-lang3-3-1-in-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-tp4018584p4018586.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Error occured when replacing commons-lang2.4 with commons-lang3-3.1 in Guvnor 5.4.0 Final
Hi manstis, I have another question. I have created a model jar in Guvnor. And the classes in this jar have references to other classes out of this jar. But I do not wanted to create another model jar to contain the refered classes. So I packaged them into a jar file and put it into the Guvnor's WEB-INF/lib directory. However after I have restarted Guvnor and Tomcat, Guvnor still could not find these refered classes. The following is error message from Guvnor's Event log: Service method 'public abstract org.drools.ide.common.client.modeldriven.SuggestionCompletionEngine org.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.RepositoryService.loadSuggestionCompletionEngine(java.lang.String) throws com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException' threw an unexpected exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: cn/id5/disruptor/util/GlobalUtil cn/id5/disruptor/util/GlobalUtil Thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-occured-when-replacing-commons-lang2-4-with-commons-lang3-3-1-in-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-tp4018584p4018589.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] How to write Hibernate query lang(HQL) in .DRL file
If you have working Java code import a.b.MyService; MyService service = ...; service.aMethod(...); then in DRL you can do import a.b.MyService; global MyService service; rule x when ... then service.aMethod(...); end and in your Java code, after you create the session and before you fire any rules you must assign an object to the global: MyService service = ...; kSession.setGlobal( service, service ); That's all. -W On 11/07/2012, ashwindrool ashwin.khandelwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Laune, We are tried to created similar scenario in which we get error when we tried to execute HQL from DRL file but unfortunately , i m sorry we r unable to give you exact what error we are getting. But it will be great if you can share your approach or process in calling hibernate query directly in DRL file. How to pass hibernate session and execute query if we can run simple select query from their , then we can go for complex nested queries. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-Hibernate-query-lang-HQL-in-DRL-file-tp4018571p4018580.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Drools scalability (performance) in numbers.
Hi, Please can any one help me out in finding the Drools performance. I wanted to know its scalabilty. What is the Drools Maximum capacity (No. of Facts/second) in Complex Event Processing w.r.t any particular Hardware/OS. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-scalability-performance-in-numbers-tp4018592.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Planner - Initialized solution local search
I'm using v5.4. I've built a prototype which uses the constructionHeuristic, and localSearch, as the example does, and am able to run the solver (though it still doesn't do a good job of solving at this point). I've now added customSolverPhase, and set it to use an initializer class which implements CustomSolverPhaseCommand. In my changeWorkingSolution, I call scoreDirector.beforeEntityAdded(), and then set the planning entity's planning variable, and then call afterEntityAdded(). If I leave any entities unadded -- and let the constructionHeuristic (BEST_FIT, etc) do the fitting (which I can verify from the logs)-- I then get this exception: /java.lang.IllegalStateException: Phase localSearch started with an uninitialized Solution. First initialize the Solution. For example, run a phase constructionHeuristic first./ For now, I can update my code to ensure that all of the entities are fitted and bypass the constructionHeuristic, but I'm curious why this error is getting thrown. I did hunt through the source code to look at all the isInitialized() methods, but I haven't yet stepped through to see which one returns false any why. As for turning on TRACE mode, see my http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-planner-5-4-0-Final-java-lang-IllegalStateException-Score-corruption-the-workingScore-tp3981199p4018558.html recent post . Jon -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Planner-Initialized-solution-local-search-tp4018594.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Planner - Initialized solution local search
Op 11-07-12 17:19, Garf schreef: I'm using v5.4. I've built a prototype which uses the constructionHeuristic, and localSearch, as the example does, and am able to run the solver (though it still doesn't do a good job of solving at this point). I've now added customSolverPhase, and set it to use an initializer class which implements CustomSolverPhaseCommand. In my changeWorkingSolution, I call scoreDirector.beforeEntityAdded(), and then set the planning entity's planning variable, and then call afterEntityAdded(). If I leave any entities unadded -- and let the constructionHeuristic (BEST_FIT, etc) do the fitting (which I can verify from the logs)-- I then get this exception: /java.lang.IllegalStateException: Phase localSearch started with an uninitialized Solution. First initialize the Solution. For example, run a phase constructionHeuristic first./ This sounds like a bug. Unless, you called afterEntityAdded() on the non initialized entities too? If that's not the case, could you file a jira? https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES For now, I can update my code to ensure that all of the entities are fitted and bypass the constructionHeuristic, but I'm curious why this error is getting thrown. I did hunt through the source code to look at all the isInitialized() methods, but I haven't yet stepped through to see which one returns false any why. As for turning on TRACE mode, see my http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-planner-5-4-0-Final-java-lang-IllegalStateException-Score-corruption-the-workingScore-tp3981199p4018558.html recent post . Jon -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Planner-Initialized-solution-local-search-tp4018594.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Score curruption exception in drools-planner-5.4.0.CR1
Garf wrote I wanted to get a better understanding of this problem. I'm getting a score Corruption error -- but only when environmentMode is set to TRACE. When it's set to REPRODUCIBLE, I get no error. Jon Score corruption detection greatly reduces performance, so it's only enabled in TRACE (and partially in DEBUG). Keep the mode on TRACE untill you fix that error. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-planner-5-4-0-Final-java-lang-IllegalStateException-Score-corruption-the-workingScore-tp3981199p4018596.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final
Hi all, Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release 5.4.0.Final in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite serious racing condition bug: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573 The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0. IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do anything as the problem did not exist in the product release. Edson -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Score curruption exception in drools-planner-5.4.0.CR1
Right, the root of the behavior is that TRACE enables assertWorkingScore(), which tells me that the workingScore (reflecting the score after the move) is not the same as the uncorruptedScore (reflecting prior to the change), and specifically, that 4 ConstraintOccurrences are mismatched. For some reason, new I looked, along the lines of Christopher's earlier suggestion, that equals() was the issue, but it was not. It just appears that insertLogical() is not replacing the ConstraintOccurences that were associated with the PlanningVariable's class. Jon -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-planner-5-4-0-Final-java-lang-IllegalStateException-Score-corruption-the-workingScore-tp3981199p4018599.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Drools scalability (performance) in numbers.
On 11 July 2012 16:34, skatta1986 shivaprasad_...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hi, Please can any one help me out in finding the Drools performance. I wanted to know its scalabilty. What is the Drools Maximum capacity (No. of Facts/second) in Complex Event Processing w.r.t any particular Hardware/OS. Facts/second when doing what with a fact? Insert? Against how many rules? Rules of what complexity? Including the firing of rules? With consequences taking how much time? With or without the insertion of derived facts? Both insert and retract? ...? A simple benchmark according to your basic scenario and run on the system of your choice is indicated. Anything else is rather pointless. -W -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-scalability-performance-in-numbers-tp4018592.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final
Hi. Thanks for the fix. I have read in Mark Proctor's blog that the 5.5 will be released within the next 4-5 months. Is there any release date for the next release in the branch 5.4.x? 2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com Hi all, Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release 5.4.0.Final in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite serious racing condition bug: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573 The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0. IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do anything as the problem did not exist in the product release. Edson -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Quentin CAILLARD *Software Engineering* quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final
Unfortunately, we have limited resources to maintain older branches in the community. While backporting fixes like this is usually quick (a few minutes of work if the source code did no diverge too much), making a full release involves usually more than a week of work by multiple members of the team. We feel that it is much more productive to use that time towards the new release putting it out sooner rather than later. In any case, users can always build from source themselves if they need the fix sooner and this kind of bug is typically found during the productization and does not usually affect the product. In the rare instances that it does, customers receive patches created by the Red Hat product team. The source is available in github: https://github.com/droolsjbpmhttps://github.com/organizations/droolsjbpm and building it is just a few maven commands. You can check the documentation for instructions. Edson On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Caillard, Quentin quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com wrote: Hi. Thanks for the fix. I have read in Mark Proctor's blog that the 5.5 will be released within the next 4-5 months. Is there any release date for the next release in the branch 5.4.x? 2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com Hi all, Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release 5.4.0.Final in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite serious racing condition bug: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573 The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0. IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do anything as the problem did not exist in the product release. Edson -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Quentin CAILLARD *Software Engineering* quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Issue
I have two objects vehicles and transactions. I am fetching values of all transactions from db and using an list and setting in the vehicles object. for example let have three columns and four rows.. name date price A12/07 700 B 12/07 100 D13/07 100 C14/07 150 i will be looping like this drools spreadsheet. $v1:vehicles() transaction() from$v1.transactionList Now i need to check for C in names and if there is D above to that need to set true. SCENARIOS A,B,C,D,B - for this false needs to be set A,B,C,D,C - set true how can we do this in drools spreadsheet is this possibe.? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-tp4018604.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Planner - Initialized solution local search
re: /Double check if you aren't calling afterEntityAdded() on the non-initialized entities too. Also check that the construction heurstics run before the localSearch solver does (the order in which they are declared in the config xml matters)./ Checked both. I'll file a JIRA bug, but I'm just searching the source some more -- I'm trying to verify that DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase.solve() doesn't exit the loop before calling setSolutionInitialized(). Jon -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Planner-Initialized-solution-local-search-tp4018594p4018605.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] [Solved] Concurrency bug in 5.4.0.Final
No problem. Thanks for the explanations about your roadmap. Quentin CAILLARD *Software Engineering* quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com 2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com Unfortunately, we have limited resources to maintain older branches in the community. While backporting fixes like this is usually quick (a few minutes of work if the source code did no diverge too much), making a full release involves usually more than a week of work by multiple members of the team. We feel that it is much more productive to use that time towards the new release putting it out sooner rather than later. In any case, users can always build from source themselves if they need the fix sooner and this kind of bug is typically found during the productization and does not usually affect the product. In the rare instances that it does, customers receive patches created by the Red Hat product team. The source is available in github: https://github.com/droolsjbpmhttps://github.com/organizations/droolsjbpm and building it is just a few maven commands. You can check the documentation for instructions. Edson On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Caillard, Quentin quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com wrote: Hi. Thanks for the fix. I have read in Mark Proctor's blog that the 5.5 will be released within the next 4-5 months. Is there any release date for the next release in the branch 5.4.x? 2012/7/11 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com Hi all, Just a heads up, in case you are using the community release 5.4.0.Final in a multi-threaded application, be aware that we found a quite serious racing condition bug: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3573 The bug is now fixed in 5.4.x branch, so I strongly recommend that you build from source and use that instead. The bug was also fixed in the up-stream branch and will be released in 5.5.0. IMPORTANT: if you are a Red Hat subscriber, you don't need to do anything as the problem did not exist in the product release. Edson -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Quentin CAILLARD *Software Engineering* quentin.caill...@ariadnext.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Compiled rules differ KnowledgeAgent vs ResourceChangeScanner
Version 5.2.0.Final. I have a DRL file that is loaded into my server using a change set and Spring configuration. The file loads without error, and I am able to read the compiled package and print the rule names to confirm they did load; however, only one of the rules fires. Then I copy (hot-deploy) the same DRL file to its server-side directory, and the Resource change Scanner picks it up and reloads it. After reload, all the expected rules execute. My guess is that the Spring/KnowledgeAgent compilation is different than the one done via the resource change scanner. Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any suggestions for further trouble shooting? I can attach the change set, spring config and drl file if needed. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Compiled-rules-differ-KnowledgeAgent-vs-ResourceChangeScanner-tp4018608.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] FireUntilHalt
I have a fairly complicated drools program and I want to introduce temporal reasoning to it. I spent a bit of time writing some proof-of-concept programs to get the feel of fusion and then tried to slowly introduce things into my original drools program. When I changed my program from using fireAllRules() to using fireUntilHalt() on a separate thread, I suddenly get failures in my unit tests. (My first thought was that there was a race condition between my unit tests and the thread calling fireUntilHalt() so I introduced a delay before my unit tests but no luck) Here are some of the behaviors I am seeing. 1) I occasionally get nullpointerexception from the thread running fireUntilHalt() 2) My lock-on-active rules aren't firing I have banged my head on this a while with no success. (I even tried putting fireAllRules() in a loop because of suggestions I saw but no luck and same behavior). My questions are, Is there a secret to using fireUntilHalt() that I am not aware of? Can anybody point me to where I can educate myself on its proper use? BTW no persistence and no spring in the code at this point. Thanks, in advance, for any help you can provide. Craig -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/FireUntilHalt-tp4018610.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] FireUntilHalt
Which Drools version are you using? There are no secrets, but you have to be aware that in this mode rules will fire right away if they can. Also, if you are using 5.4.0.Final, please read another e-mail I sent to the list today, as there was a concurrency bug that was fixed in the 5.4.x branch that could cause NPE. Edson On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:16 PM, crajor crjo...@sandia.gov wrote: I have a fairly complicated drools program and I want to introduce temporal reasoning to it. I spent a bit of time writing some proof-of-concept programs to get the feel of fusion and then tried to slowly introduce things into my original drools program. When I changed my program from using fireAllRules() to using fireUntilHalt() on a separate thread, I suddenly get failures in my unit tests. (My first thought was that there was a race condition between my unit tests and the thread calling fireUntilHalt() so I introduced a delay before my unit tests but no luck) Here are some of the behaviors I am seeing. 1) I occasionally get nullpointerexception from the thread running fireUntilHalt() 2) My lock-on-active rules aren't firing I have banged my head on this a while with no success. (I even tried putting fireAllRules() in a loop because of suggestions I saw but no luck and same behavior). My questions are, Is there a secret to using fireUntilHalt() that I am not aware of? Can anybody point me to where I can educate myself on its proper use? BTW no persistence and no spring in the code at this point. Thanks, in advance, for any help you can provide. Craig -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/FireUntilHalt-tp4018610.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
