[rules-users] Hello and my first question
Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
You can take a look at 'Conditional named consequences' to see if that is what you need: http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html_single/#releaseNotes_5.5.0_Expert Best Regards, Esteban Aliverti - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] New object in XLS ACTION
What result do you get with the following (on a single row):- ACTION| ACTION| ACTION --+---+- FeeDTO feeDTO = new FeeDTO(); | feeDTO.setAmount(new BigDecimal($1)); | feeDTO.setReason($1) On 7 January 2013 15:11, aleste moisesvent...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to create a new object, populate a number of attributes in it and insert it in memory as part of the ACTION in a decision table XLS. I was able to do that in a single XLS column: ACTION insertLogical( new RuleError(t, Constants.ErrorType.PROMOTION, $1, $2)); Or using the guided decision tables in Guvnor: FeeDTO [f3] amount 10 20 (...) But I have not been able to do it using an XLS and having multiple ACTION columns. Something like: ACTION ACTION FeeDTO feeDTO = new FeeDTO(); feeDTO.setAmount(new BigDecimal($1)); feeDTO.setReason($1); This is the rule that I'd be expecting as result of the XLS compilation: //from row number: 3 rule Row 3 FeesTest dialect mvel when f1 : FinancialTransactionDTO( transactionType == TRANSACTION_TYPE.DEPOSIT ) then FeeDTO f3 = new FeeDTO(); f3.setAmount( 20 ); f3.setType( Some Description ); f3.setOverrideable (true); insert( f3 ); end -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/New-object-in-XLS-ACTION-tp4021374.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
I take optional to mean don't care whether it is there or not - so why don't you simply omit this condition? -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
Because the annotation should extract most of the unstructured information, into a structured object. So if there is optionally such an information like an anatomic side, I would want to add this information to my structured object. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:22:37 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question I take optional to mean don't care whether it is there or not - so why don't you simply omit this condition? -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Which libs should I update after update?
Hello everyone, in order to update from drools 5.4 to 5.5 which lib should I update? Or must I replace them all? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
Then the approach depends on the way $NE1, $NE2 and $NE3 are to be added to the structured object. If the two or three values need to be combined (e.g., concatenated in some specific order), you might use two distinct rules as extensions of the common part: rule body-anatomy when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) then end rule body-anatomy anatomic extends body-anatomy when $NE3: NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2, $NE3 as required, add to... end rule body-anatomy no anatomic extends body-anatomy when not NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2 as required, add to... end If $NE1 + $NE2 and $NE3 can be added individually, you might omit the third rule and add $NE1 + $NE2 in the first rule. Or use the named consequence feature. -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Because the annotation should extract most of the unstructured information, into a structured object. So if there is optionally such an information like an anatomic side, I would want to add this information to my structured object. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:22:37 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question I take optional to mean don't care whether it is there or not - so why don't you simply omit this condition? -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Stuck on simple testcase
Hi, I wrote a quite simple unit test which I expected to succeed. But it does not, it ends with a negative score. Though, it is easy to see on sight that there is a zero-score solution possible. So... something must be wrong in some of my rules. I was wondering if it is possible to manually set all planning variables to what I expected them to be and then see which rule(s) break(s)? So planning variables should not be changed anymore while solving. I'm using drools planner 5.5.0.Final. Thanks, Michiel - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Which libs should I update after update?
If you're using maven/gradle/ivy/buildr, just update the version and let it figure out the transitive dependencies. Although you might want to use the enforcer plugin to check if you haven't overwritten any transitive dependency to a lower version: http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/requireUpperBoundDeps.html If you're using ant, basically replace all of them with those from the 5.5 lib zip. If you want to get rid of dead deps, compare the 5.4 lib zip with the 5.5 lib zip afterwards (= painful). If you just want the subset of deps that you need (like with maven, for example if you only use drools-core, you don't need most of the deps in the lib zip), don't use ant. Op 14-01-13 12:44, Andre Froes schreef: Hello everyone, in order to update from drools 5.4 to 5.5 which lib should I update? Or must I replace them all? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
Solution: So I've decided for a third solution. First was using the named consequence feature, but I did not want to have multiple consequence-blocks, that would only make confusing code. The second solution was extending the rule, that would have been a nice solution, but also confusing by growing optionally conditions. So I used the third solution, I've splitted the rule into two rules. It's almost the same as the extending version with a slight difference in the time when it comes for passing the condition. I think the hierarchy will give a better overview by understanding the rules, thats why I choosed separation instead of extension rules. State of my rules: rule Annotate Anatomy when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) then $anno : Annotation($NE1 + $NE2); anno.setType(Anatomy); list.add(anno); end rule Add AnatomicSide to Anatomy when $AN : Annotation(Type.contains(Anatomy)) $NE : NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then $anno : Annotation($AN + $NE) anno.setType(Anatomy); list.add(anno); list.remove(AN); end Thanks for solving this problem. Janisch - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:56:58 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question Then the approach depends on the way $NE1, $NE2 and $NE3 are to be added to the structured object. If the two or three values need to be combined (e.g., concatenated in some specific order), you might use two distinct rules as extensions of the common part: rule body-anatomy when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) then end rule body-anatomy anatomic extends body-anatomy when $NE3: NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2, $NE3 as required, add to... end rule body-anatomy no anatomic extends body-anatomy when not NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2 as required, add to... end If $NE1 + $NE2 and $NE3 can be added individually, you might omit the third rule and add $NE1 + $NE2 in the first rule. Or use the named consequence feature. -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Because the annotation should extract most of the unstructured information, into a structured object. So if there is optionally such an information like an anatomic side, I would want to add this information to my structured object. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:22:37 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question I take optional to mean don't care whether it is there or not - so why don't you simply omit this condition? -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way? Thanks everyone to who reads this. Janisch ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Solution
On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: so if someone has the same problem, to get some options how to solve this problem. Posting code that's grossly syntactically invalid isn't going to help. -W ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
Personally, I use the Spring framework to provide SOAP (and REST) web services to other applications. It's relatively simple to set it up and I'm fond of the contract-first approach which it encourages. With regards integration with Drools, it's easy enough in Spring. You just need to create a Spring bean to act as the interface to your knowledge base. That way, Spring ensures that you have only one knowledge base instance in play, so it is configured and compiled when the application starts. I'd be happy to answer any Spring/Drools integration questions (I don;t tend to use other web frameworks), and I can provide some code examples if Spring is the way you wish to go. Steve On 14 Jan 2013, at 13:50, riri irina.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I need to develop a web application that includes Drools as its rule engine and would like to expose its functionality as web services. I would appreciate some expert opinion on which framework would be easiest to learn and to work with. Some of the posts I have seen regarding Drools and OSGi refer to it as a nightmare. Is that still true with the current version? If anyone has had any experience with Spring, EJB or other and would like to share I would be very interested since I am new to this domain. If there is a case to be made about not using a framework at all then I would also like to hear you out. Best regards, -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
You can also take advantage of the Drools and Camel integration. Apache Camel is an integration framework that does exactly that, expose the services via different transports. Cheers On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Stephen Masters stephen.mast...@me.comwrote: Personally, I use the Spring framework to provide SOAP (and REST) web services to other applications. It's relatively simple to set it up and I'm fond of the contract-first approach which it encourages. With regards integration with Drools, it's easy enough in Spring. You just need to create a Spring bean to act as the interface to your knowledge base. That way, Spring ensures that you have only one knowledge base instance in play, so it is configured and compiled when the application starts. I'd be happy to answer any Spring/Drools integration questions (I don;t tend to use other web frameworks), and I can provide some code examples if Spring is the way you wish to go. Steve On 14 Jan 2013, at 13:50, riri irina.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I need to develop a web application that includes Drools as its rule engine and would like to expose its functionality as web services. I would appreciate some expert opinion on which framework would be easiest to learn and to work with. Some of the posts I have seen regarding Drools and OSGi refer to it as a nightmare. Is that still true with the current version? If anyone has had any experience with Spring, EJB or other and would like to share I would be very interested since I am new to this domain. If there is a case to be made about not using a framework at all then I would also like to hear you out. Best regards, -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
To your questions/marks: is anno global? Not it is not. I've forgot to declare the variable. The line should be like this: Annotation anno = new Annotation($NE1 + + $NE2); Annotation is a Type I import and the beginning of the file. Is list global? Yes list is declared as a global variable. In list I store each different annotation, so even if I change an attribute to an annotation, I will have only the latest annotation, which contains most of the extracted information. You don't have any gurantee that the other rule has alread fired and added some Annotation to list and so the remove may fail, and you'll get the other Annotation object added later. There is a guarantee that I have the annotation before I delete it. Until there is no Annotation of Anatomy, the second rule will not pass the condition, because there exists no annotation with a type of Anatomy. But maybe you thought there would be no guarantee because I forgot to add the annotation (created from the first rule) to the list. If so then sorry for my mistake, there should also something like: list.add(anno); in the first rule. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 13:57:42 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Solution: You may want to review the syntax... State of my rules: rule Annotate Anatomy when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) then $anno : Annotation($NE1 + $NE2); A pattern, not a statement. Invalid expression in the parenthesis. anno.setType(Anatomy); Is anno global? list.add(anno); Is list global? end rule Add AnatomicSide to Anatomy when $AN : Annotation(Type.contains(Anatomy)) $NE : NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then $anno : Annotation($AN + $NE) As above. anno.setType(Anatomy); list.add(anno); list.remove(AN); You don't have any gurantee that the other rule has alread fired and added some Annotation to list and so the remove may fail, and you'll get the other Annotation object added later. It's not quite so simple. Take care! -W end Thanks for solving this problem. Janisch - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:56:58 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question Then the approach depends on the way $NE1, $NE2 and $NE3 are to be added to the structured object. If the two or three values need to be combined (e.g., concatenated in some specific order), you might use two distinct rules as extensions of the common part: rule body-anatomy when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) then end rule body-anatomy anatomic extends body-anatomy when $NE3: NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2, $NE3 as required, add to... end rule body-anatomy no anatomic extends body-anatomy when not NE(Type.contains(anatomic)) then combine $NE1, $NE2 as required, add to... end If $NE1 + $NE2 and $NE3 can be added individually, you might omit the third rule and add $NE1 + $NE2 in the first rule. Or use the named consequence feature. -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Because the annotation should extract most of the unstructured information, into a structured object. So if there is optionally such an information like an anatomic side, I would want to add this information to my structured object. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:22:37 Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question I take optional to mean don't care whether it is there or not - so why don't you simply omit this condition? -W On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch bojan.jani...@scai.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hello everybody, this is my first post and also my first question to you. I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any information regarding optionally conditions. I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the following rule: When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text (they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains generally something like lateral oder medial and so on), then generate me a new annotation. So up to now I'm on this state: Rule Anatomic Side when $NE1 : NE(Type.contains(body)) $NE2 : NE(Type.contains(anatomy)) //So here starts the problem [$NE3 : NE(Type.contains(anatomic))] then ... How can I set a condition as
[rules-users] Guvnor model with 'Comparable' not working
Hi everybody,
I use Guvnor 5.4 and have a model which consists of classes and subclasses.
@Entity
public class TestClass {
@Id
private long id;
@Embedded
private TestEmbeddable embedded;
}
@Embeddable
public class TestEmbeddable implements ComparableTestEmbeddable {
@Column
private String testProperty;
@Override
public int compareTo(TestEmbeddable o) {...}
}
Now, in Guvnor I use the guided Editor and create a new WHEN condition:
There is a TestClass with:
embedded ...
Usually, when I click on embedded, I can select
Apply a constraint to a sub-field of 'embedded': Show sub fields ...
This line does NOT show if that subclass (here: TestEmbeddable) implements
Comparable. It does however work if I don't use Comparable or if I select
TestEmbeddable directly (which I can't as I don't inject those into my working
environment).
Is this a known bug? I couldn't find anything about this.
TIA
Dominik
...
mit freundlichen Gr??en / kind regards
Dominik Sandjaja
Fon: +49 (0) 203 60878 183
Fax: +49 (0) 203 60878 222
e-mail: dominik.sandj...@it-motive.de
it-motive AG
Zum Walkm?ller 10-12
47269 Duisburg
i...@it-motive.de
http://www.it-motive.de
..
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Straub
Vorstand: Horst-Dieter Deelmann (Vors.), Matthias Heming, Christoph Tim Klose
HRB 9207, Amtsgericht Duisburg
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Stuck on simple testcase
Hi, I hope this is ok: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3716 Regards, Michiel Vermandel - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials From: Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com To: Michiel Vermandel mverm...@yahoo.com; Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 2:34 PM Subject: Re: Stuck on simple testcase Op 14-01-13 14:16, Michiel Vermandel schreef: Hi Geoffrey, Putting the entityTabuSizeto 3 did fix the issue, indeed. Many thanks for the tip. With Feel free to make an issue about this., do you mean I should register an Issue here?: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DROOLS Do it in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES in component drools-planner for now. Thanks - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials From: Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com To: Michiel Vermandel mverm...@yahoo.com; Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Stuck on simple testcase Op 14-01-13 13:08, Michiel Vermandel schreef: Hi, I wrote a quite simple unit test which I expected to succeed. But it does not, it ends with a negative score. Enable logging trace (logging != environmentMode) and check if you can see the moves that it should take and why it doesn't take them. A very small problem can't work with entityTabuSize 7 for example. There are some idea's to auto-tweak the entityTabuSize or at least automatically lower it if there are too little entities. Feel free to make an issue about this. Though, it is easy to see on sight that there is a zero-score solution possible. So... something must be wrong in some of my rules. I was wondering if it is possible to manually set all planning variables to what I expected them to be and then see which rule(s) break(s)? Yes, see Solver.getScoreDirectorFactory (see docs). So planning variables should not be changed anymore while solving. I'm using drools planner 5.5.0.Final. Thanks, Michiel - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
Thank you for your very quick replies. You just need to create a Spring bean to act as the interface to your knowledge base. That way, Spring ensures that you have only one knowledge base instance in play, so it is configured and compiled when the application starts. Does this mean that you can not have more than one knowledge base configured? My application basically needs to offer the ability to edit and test a user's own rules and facts (in a way similar to what Guvnor does but much more simplified) and I do not know if that can be done using just one knowledge base and sessions. I was thinking of having a separate knowledge base per user and using a KnowledgeAgent for updating but I have yet to test this approach. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509p4021515.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Stuck on simple testcase
Op 14-01-13 15:42, Michiel Vermandel schreef: Hi, I hope this is ok: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3716 Looks good, thanks. Regards, Michiel Vermandel - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials From: Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com To: Michiel Vermandel mverm...@yahoo.com; Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 2:34 PM Subject: Re: Stuck on simple testcase Op 14-01-13 14:16, Michiel Vermandel schreef: Hi Geoffrey, Putting the entityTabuSizeto 3 did fix the issue, indeed. Many thanks for the tip. With "Feel free to make an issue about this.", do you mean I should register an Issue here?: https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DROOLS Do it in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES in component drools-planner for now. Thanks - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials From: Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com To: Michiel Vermandel mverm...@yahoo.com; Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Stuck on simple testcase Op 14-01-13 13:08, Michiel Vermandel schreef: Hi, I wrote a quite simple unit test which I expected to succeed. But it does not, it ends with a negative score. Enable logging trace (logging != environmentMode) and check if you can see the moves that it should take and why it doesn't take them. A very small problem can't work with entityTabuSize 7 for example. There are some idea's to auto-tweak the entityTabuSize or at least automatically lower it if there are too little entities. Feel free to make an issue about this. Though, it is easy to see on sight that there is a zero-score solution possible. So... something must be wrong in some of my rules. I was wondering if it is possible to manually set all planning variables to what I expected them to be and then see which rule(s) break(s)?
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
Oh no … I have multiple knowledge bases configured in my apps. I just use a separate Spring bean to wrap each. :) Although for your purposes it shouldn't be too tricky to manage a pool of knowledge bases or create a reference to one per user session. The main risk would be memory usage if you have a large knowledge base or lots of facts, as a knowledge base and session is relatively memory hungry. Depends on how many users you have I guess. On 14 Jan 2013, at 14:44, riri irina.a...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your very quick replies. You just need to create a Spring bean to act as the interface to your knowledge base. That way, Spring ensures that you have only one knowledge base instance in play, so it is configured and compiled when the application starts. Does this mean that you can not have more than one knowledge base configured? My application basically needs to offer the ability to edit and test a user's own rules and facts (in a way similar to what Guvnor does but much more simplified) and I do not know if that can be done using just one knowledge base and sessions. I was thinking of having a separate knowledge base per user and using a KnowledgeAgent for updating but I have yet to test this approach. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509p4021515.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
I am using Jboss Switchyard. It has built in support for drools services. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509p4021519.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Web services and Drools
Stephen Masters wrote The main risk would be memory usage if you have a large knowledge base or lots of facts, as a knowledge base and session is relatively memory hungry. Depends on how many users you have I guess. Yes, I am aware of the potential memory problems but as of now I do not have other ideas on how to meet the requirements. Spring is a very popular framework and I will be taking it into account into my choices, so thank you for offering to help me out. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Web-services-and-Drools-tp4021509p4021520.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Which libs should I update after update?
I'm trying by maven, but still can't do it
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
artifactIdai/artifactId
nameProj/name
packagingjar/packaging
parent
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdparent-pom/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/parent
properties
org.drools.version5.5.0.Final/org.drools.version
org.codehaus.janino.version2.5.16/org.codehaus.janino.version
/properties
!-- Dependencies --
dependencies
!-- Projects --
dependency
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdcommons/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/dependency
!-- API --
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-core/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-compiler/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.codehaus.janino/groupId
artifactIdjanino/artifactId
version${org.codehaus.janino.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
/dependencies
is this right?
2013/1/14 Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com
If you're using maven/gradle/ivy/buildr, just update the version and let
it figure out the transitive dependencies.
Although you might want to use the enforcer plugin to check if you
haven't overwritten any transitive dependency to a lower version:
http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/requireUpperBoundDeps.html
If you're using ant, basically replace all of them with those from the
5.5 lib zip.
If you want to get rid of dead deps, compare the 5.4 lib zip with the
5.5 lib zip afterwards (= painful).
If you just want the subset of deps that you need (like with maven, for
example if you only use drools-core, you don't need most of the deps in
the lib zip), don't use ant.
Op 14-01-13 12:44, Andre Froes schreef:
Hello everyone,
in order to update from drools 5.4 to 5.5 which lib should I update? Or
must
I replace them all?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor seems to copy assets across External RDBMS and file system
Thanks for the reply Jervis. I would like to clarify my question, however: Guvnor uses a great deal of technologies with which I am not at all familiar. I am new to JCR in general and jackrabbit in particular, so even when I get something to seemingly work, I still question whether I've broken a best practice. Having said that, I used guvnor admin tool to create the repository.xml file, and there are two spots where it still points to the file system instead of the DB. In both cases, it is the SearchIndex element, using the lucene library. I am pretty sure this is what is still creating the folders in my file system. My question is: since the DB has its own indexes, do I still need the SearchIndex elements, and if so, is it better to leave them pointing to the file system? I am asking because I assume that the repository.xml generated by the Guvnor admin tool is more accurate than what I would create as a novice. Thanks again for the help! Best, Yuri On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jervis Liu j...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013/1/10 23:30, Yuri wrote: I set up SQL Server as the external repository, and left everything else in guvnor and jboss AS7 configured pretty much according to defaults. When I create assets in guvnor, I see that changes are being made in the MSSQL db. Despite changes to the db, however, I'm still seeing changes to the Repository and Workspace folders. It gets more interesting when I truncate the tables in the external guvnor db, and restart guvnor, it seems to get all of its assets back from those two folders. If you truncate your external db and you still get all assets back when your restart Guvnor, then there must be some problems with your configurations. Guvnor does nothing special as far as the persistent layer is concerned, you should be able to follow JackRabbit document to set it up correctly, for example: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-configuration.html#JackrabbitConfiguration-Persistenceconfiguration Cheers, Jervis Am I doing something wrong? Is it reconstructing the assets from lucene indexes? If MSSQL is already indexing things, is the lucene index still necessary? Are these basic JCR concepts that I am not grasping? Thanks, Yuri ___ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor seems to copy assets across External RDBMS and file system
Hi Yuri, the lucene search indexes cannot be persisted to the JCR repo. They will always be persisted to your local file system. They can be removed however between server startups and will get regenerated on next use. The Guvnor admin tool generates Jackrabbit configs for different databases so its a good thing to use them, but you can always edit the generated configurations for your specific needs. HTH Tihomir On 1/14/13 1:22 PM, Yuri wrote: Thanks for the reply Jervis. I would like to clarify my question, however: Guvnor uses a great deal of technologies with which I am not at all familiar. I am new to JCR in general and jackrabbit in particular, so even when I get something to seemingly work, I still question whether I've broken a best practice. Having said that, I used guvnor admin tool to create the repository.xml file, and there are two spots where it still points to the file system instead of the DB. In both cases, it is the SearchIndex element, using the lucene library. I am pretty sure this is what is still creating the folders in my file system. My question is: since the DB has its own indexes, do I still need the SearchIndex elements, and if so, is it better to leave them pointing to the file system? I am asking because I assume that the repository.xml generated by the Guvnor admin tool is more accurate than what I would create as a novice. Thanks again for the help! Best, Yuri On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jervis Liu j...@redhat.com mailto:j...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013/1/10 23:30, Yuri wrote: I set up SQL Server as the external repository, and left everything else in guvnor and jboss AS7 configured pretty much according to defaults. When I create assets in guvnor, I see that changes are being made in the MSSQL db. Despite changes to the db, however, I'm still seeing changes to the Repository and Workspace folders. It gets more interesting when I truncate the tables in the external guvnor db, and restart guvnor, it seems to get all of its assets back from those two folders. If you truncate your external db and you still get all assets back when your restart Guvnor, then there must be some problems with your configurations. Guvnor does nothing special as far as the persistent layer is concerned, you should be able to follow JackRabbit document to set it up correctly, for example: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-configuration.html#JackrabbitConfiguration-Persistenceconfiguration Cheers, Jervis Am I doing something wrong? Is it reconstructing the assets from lucene indexes? If MSSQL is already indexing things, is the lucene index still necessary? Are these basic JCR concepts that I am not grasping? Thanks, Yuri ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] not able to access Guvnor repository files when using webdav folders for Guvnor 5.4 deployed on Tomcat 7 and windows 2008 64 bit server
Jervis, Thank You for confirming the issue. The scenario I am having is as such. the first time Guvnor 5.4.0.final in Tomcat 7 is started, I am able to connect to both webdav folders and also through a java client using basic authentication. but when I disconnect the web folders connection after a while, I can no longer get access to the packages through the java client or reconnect the webdav folders again unless I restart Tomcat. does this issue seem to be similar or close as what you have created the bug for ? Please let me know if I have not been clear enough in explaining my scenario. - Ram -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/not-able-to-access-Guvnor-repository-files-when-using-webdav-folders-for-Guvnor-5-4-deployed-on-Tomcr-tp4021300p4021524.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor seems to copy assets across External RDBMS and file system
That is what I was looking for - thanks Tihomir! On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Tihomir Surdilovic tsurd...@redhat.comwrote: Hi Yuri, the lucene search indexes cannot be persisted to the JCR repo. They will always be persisted to your local file system. They can be removed however between server startups and will get regenerated on next use. The Guvnor admin tool generates Jackrabbit configs for different databases so its a good thing to use them, but you can always edit the generated configurations for your specific needs. HTH Tihomir On 1/14/13 1:22 PM, Yuri wrote: Thanks for the reply Jervis. I would like to clarify my question, however: Guvnor uses a great deal of technologies with which I am not at all familiar. I am new to JCR in general and jackrabbit in particular, so even when I get something to seemingly work, I still question whether I've broken a best practice. Having said that, I used guvnor admin tool to create the repository.xml file, and there are two spots where it still points to the file system instead of the DB. In both cases, it is the SearchIndex element, using the lucene library. I am pretty sure this is what is still creating the folders in my file system. My question is: since the DB has its own indexes, do I still need the SearchIndex elements, and if so, is it better to leave them pointing to the file system? I am asking because I assume that the repository.xml generated by the Guvnor admin tool is more accurate than what I would create as a novice. Thanks again for the help! Best, Yuri On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jervis Liu j...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013/1/10 23:30, Yuri wrote: I set up SQL Server as the external repository, and left everything else in guvnor and jboss AS7 configured pretty much according to defaults. When I create assets in guvnor, I see that changes are being made in the MSSQL db. Despite changes to the db, however, I'm still seeing changes to the Repository and Workspace folders. It gets more interesting when I truncate the tables in the external guvnor db, and restart guvnor, it seems to get all of its assets back from those two folders. If you truncate your external db and you still get all assets back when your restart Guvnor, then there must be some problems with your configurations. Guvnor does nothing special as far as the persistent layer is concerned, you should be able to follow JackRabbit document to set it up correctly, for example: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-configuration.html#JackrabbitConfiguration-Persistenceconfiguration Cheers, Jervis Am I doing something wrong? Is it reconstructing the assets from lucene indexes? If MSSQL is already indexing things, is the lucene index still necessary? Are these basic JCR concepts that I am not grasping? Thanks, Yuri ___ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Which libs should I update after update?
Op 14-01-13 18:27, Andr Fres schreef:
I'm trying by maven, but still can't do it
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
artifactIdai/artifactId
nameProj/name
packagingjar/packaging
parent
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdparent-pom/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/parent
properties
org.drools.version5.5.0.Final/org.drools.version
org.codehaus.janino.version2.5.16/org.codehaus.janino.version
/properties
!-- Dependencies --
dependencies
!-- Projects --
dependency
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdcommons/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/dependency
!-- API --
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-core/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
Why go scope provided?
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-compiler/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
Why go scope provided?
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.codehaus.janino/groupId
artifactIdjanino/artifactId
By default drools-compiler transitively depends on a java compiler
(I forgot if it's janino or eclipse jdt),
so you don't need to specify that dependency.
If you want to use the other one, you might want to exclude the
default.
Either way, you might want to try first with the default one, by not
declaring any janino/jdt dependency and let maven drag in the
transitive dependency automatically.
version${org.codehaus.janino.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
/dependencies
is this right?
2013/1/14 Geoffrey De Smet ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com
If you're using
maven/gradle/ivy/buildr, just update the version and let
it figure out the transitive dependencies.
Although you might want to use the enforcer plugin to
check if you
haven't overwritten any transitive dependency to a lower
version:
http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/requireUpperBoundDeps.html
If you're using ant, basically replace all of them with
those from the
5.5 lib zip.
If you want to get rid of dead deps, compare the 5.4 lib
zip with the
5.5 lib zip afterwards (= painful).
If you just want the subset of deps that you need (like
with maven, for
example if you only use drools-core, you don't need most
of the deps in
the lib zip), don't use ant.
Op 14-01-13 12:44, Andre Froes schreef:
Hello everyone,
in order to update from drools 5.4 to 5.5 which lib
should I update? Or must
I replace them all?
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
[rules-users] Drools KnowledgeAgent not picking up drl resource updates
Hi,
I am looking for a way to update drools rules files in our production
environment without having to go through a full application rebuild and
redeploy to pick up .drl modifications.
To make this seamless, I'm investigating using change sets but I can't get a
KnowledgeBase to update when a .drl is updated.
Here is the code I have, all files are in the /root/com/me/drools package:
*1. DroolsConfig.java - Helper class to configure and start a
KnowledgeAgent. It references a local change-set.xml to manage the Drools
resources and scan for resource changes every 2 seconds*
package com.me.drools;
import org.drools.KnowledgeBase;
import org.drools.agent.KnowledgeAgent;
import org.drools.agent.KnowledgeAgentConfiguration;
import org.drools.agent.KnowledgeAgentFactory;
import org.drools.builder.KnowledgeBuilderConfiguration;
import org.drools.io.ResourceChangeScannerConfiguration;
import org.drools.io.ResourceFactory;
public class DroolsConfig {
public KnowledgeBase getAgentKnowledgeBase() {
ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeNotifierService().start();
ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().start();
ResourceChangeScannerConfiguration sconf =
ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().newResourceChangeScannerConfiguration();
sconf.setProperty(drools.resource.scanner.interval, 2);
ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().configure(sconf);
KnowledgeAgentConfiguration aconf =
KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgentConfiguration();
aconf.setProperty(drools.agent.scanDirectories, true);
aconf.setProperty(drools.agent.scanResources, true);
aconf.setProperty(drools.agent.newInstance, true);
KnowledgeAgent knowledgeAgent =
KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgent(CS, aconf);
knowledgeAgent.applyChangeSet(ResourceFactory.newFileResource(/root/com/me/drools/change-set.xml));
return knowledgeAgent.getKnowledgeBase();
}
}
*2. change-set.xml - Referenced from DroolsConfig and manages a local rules
file*
change-set xmlns='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set'
xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
xs:schemaLocation='http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set.xsd
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-api/src/main/resources/change-set-1.0.0.xsd'
add
resource source='file:/root/com/me/drools/personrules.drl'
type='DRL' /
/add
/change-set
To test this out I have the following JUnit. The aim is to run the test and
during the loop execution, change the condition in the drl so that the
KnowledgeBase updates and rule results differ.
*3. DroolsConfigTest.java - Tests DroolsConfig. Rule results should change
during loop execution if drl is updated*
package com.me.drools;
import org.drools.KnowledgeBase;
import org.drools.runtime.StatelessKnowledgeSession;
import org.junit.Test;
public class DroolsConfigTest {
@Test
public void testGetAgentKnowledgeBase() throws Exception {
Person person = new Person();
DroolsConfig droolsConfig = new DroolsConfig();
KnowledgeBase kb = droolsConfig.getAgentKnowledgeBase();
for (int i = 0; i 10; i++) {
StatelessKnowledgeSession session =
kb.newStatelessKnowledgeSession();
session.execute(person);
Thread.currentThread().sleep(3000);
System.out.println(person.getErrors().size());
}
System.out.println(Errors: + person.getErrors());
}
}
Just for reference here is PersonTO and the person.drl rules file.
*4. Person.java - Simple object to fire rules against*
package com.me.drools;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class Person {
private String name;
private ListString errors = new ArrayListString();
public void addError(final String error) {
errors.add(error);
}
public ListString getErrors() {
return errors;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
*5. personrules.drl*
package com.me.drools
import com.me.drools.Person
dialect java
rule name_is_null
when
$p : Person( name == null )
then
$p.addError(Name is null);
end
So, as mentioned when the for loop in DroolsConfigTest is running, I'm
changing the condition in the personrules.drl file from name == null to name
!= null which should mean that errors are no longer added to the errors List
in Person.class but the error count keeps on going up.
Can anybody see why the KnowledgeAgent isn't updating and how I can make
this configuration work so that I can change the drl on the fly and have the
rules behave accordingly?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-KnowledgeAgent-not-picking-up-drl-resource-updates-tp4021527.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [rules-users] Which libs should I update after update?
Thanks for the assjstance, I managed to do it. The problem was a ljb, slf4j.
Best regards
Em 14/01/2013 17:55, ge0ffrey [via Drools]
ml-node+s46999n4021526...@n3.nabble.com escreveu:
Op 14-01-13 18:27, André Fróes schreef:
I'm trying by maven, but still can't do it
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
artifactIdai/artifactId
nameProj/name
packagingjar/packaging
parent
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdparent-pom/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/parent
properties
org.drools.version5.5.0.Final/org.drools.version
org.codehaus.janino.version2.5.16/org.codehaus.janino.version
/properties
!-- Dependencies --
dependencies
!-- Projects --
dependency
groupIdmy.new.project/groupId
artifactIdcommons/artifactId
version1.0.0/version
/dependency
!-- API --
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-core/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
Why go scope provided?
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.drools/groupId
artifactIddrools-compiler/artifactId
version${org.drools.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
Why go scope provided?
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.codehaus.janino/groupId
artifactIdjanino/artifactId
By default drools-compiler transitively depends on a java compiler (I
forgot if it's janino or eclipse jdt),
so you don't need to specify that dependency.
If you want to use the other one, you might want to exclude the default.
Either way, you might want to try first with the default one, by not
declaring any janino/jdt dependency and let maven drag in the transitive
dependency automatically.
version${org.codehaus.janino.version}/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
/dependencies
is this right?
2013/1/14 Geoffrey De Smet [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4021526i=0
If you're using maven/gradle/ivy/buildr, just update the version and let
it figure out the transitive dependencies.
Although you might want to use the enforcer plugin to check if you
haven't overwritten any transitive dependency to a lower version:
http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/requireUpperBoundDeps.html
If you're using ant, basically replace all of them with those from the
5.5 lib zip.
If you want to get rid of dead deps, compare the 5.4 lib zip with the
5.5 lib zip afterwards (= painful).
If you just want the subset of deps that you need (like with maven, for
example if you only use drools-core, you don't need most of the deps in
the lib zip), don't use ant.
Op 14-01-13 12:44, Andre Froes schreef:
Hello everyone,
in order to update from drools 5.4 to 5.5 which lib should I update? Or
must
I replace them all?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4021526i=1
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4021526i=2
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list[hidden email]
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4021526i=3https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=4021526i=4
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500p4021526.html
To unsubscribe from Which libs should I update after update?, click
herehttp://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4021500code=YXJmbW9yYWVzQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0MDIxNTAwfC0xNzc4ODYzNTkz
.
NAMLhttp://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Which-libs-should-I-update-after-update-tp4021500p4021528.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum
[rules-users] [Switchyard RuleService] Rule doesnt fire when in FireAllRules mode
Im confused about why my rule isnt firing. Im using Jboss SwitchYard. This is the only difference from the switchyard perspective: rules:action name=sendData type=FIRE_ALL_RULES entryPoint=AccountData/ And when I use EXECUTE the rule fires. When I use FIRE_ALL_RULES, it never gets activated. This is my rule: | rule OpenTrade-Open 2. | agenda-group OpenTrade 3. | no-loop true 4. | dialect mvel 5. | when 6. | Tick( ) over window:time (1m) from entry-point AccountData 7. | then 8. | TradeOrder newTrade = new TradeOrder(); 9. | newTrade.setSymbol( EURUSD ); 10. | newTrade.setVolume( 1 ); 11. | newTrade.setMt4username( 4002642 ); 12. | newTrade.setStatus( OrderStatus.OPENING ); 13. | newTrade.setOperation( OP_BUY ); 14. | newTrade.setComment( From Magick.Rhythm ); 15. | insert( newTrade ); 16. | modifiedOrderList.add(newTrade); 17. | end -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Switchyard-RuleService-Rule-doesnt-fire-when-in-FireAllRules-mode-tp4021530.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] not able to access Guvnor repository files when using webdav folders for Guvnor 5.4 deployed on Tomcat 7 and windows 2008 64 bit server
On 2013/1/15 2:55, vadlam wrote: Jervis, Thank You for confirming the issue. The scenario I am having is as such. the first time Guvnor 5.4.0.final in Tomcat 7 is started, I am able to connect to both webdav folders and also through a java client using basic authentication. but when I disconnect the web folders connection after a while, I can no longer get access to the packages through the java client or reconnect the webdav folders again unless I restart Tomcat. does this issue seem to be similar or close as what you have created the bug for ? Hi Ram, I've updated https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1986 with a how-to-reproduce section. No, what I have observed is different from yours, webdav can not be connected from the very beginning. The root cause of the problem is the authentication info (username/pwd) didnt get passed into authenticator correctly. I've tested this problem on Windows, but your mileage may vary if you are using a different webdav client. The most crucial thing to check is, it must be a same problem if you see following exception from the server log: INFO 15-01 09:49:07,499 (DemoAuthenticator.java:authenticate:54) Demo lo gin for user (null) failed: unsupported username/credential. WARN 15-01 09:49:07,499 (AuthorizationHeaderChecker.java:loginByHeader:65) Unable to authenticate for rest api: null Cheers, Jervis Please let me know if I have not been clear enough in explaining my scenario. - Ram -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/not-able-to-access-Guvnor-repository-files-when-using-webdav-folders-for-Guvnor-5-4-deployed-on-Tomcr-tp4021300p4021524.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Difficulty determining why I have score corruption
Hi Geofrey, Yes it is 5.5.0.Final. From the following artifacts: group: 'org.drools.planner', name: 'drools-planner-core', version: '5.5.0.Final' group: 'org.drools', name: 'drools-core', version: '5.5.0.Final' group: 'org.drools', name: 'drools-compiler', version: '5.5.0.Final' Cheers Megan -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Difficulty-determining-why-I-have-score-corruption-tp4021412p4021533.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
