Re: [rules-users] Seting up test scenarios for Excel Decision Table with a map of data coming in
Hi Laune, When you say /If you can insert data for the declared incomingData and make a rule fire for each fact, the consequence could create the map from the fields of the incomingData fact and insert it/ I don't understand, how will the map be created automatically. Can you give an example or sscce http://sscce.org - AA -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Seting-up-test-scenarios-for-Excel-Decision-Table-with-a-map-of-data-coming-in-tp4027995p4028005.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Seting up test scenarios for Excel Decision Table with a map of data coming in
On 06/02/2014, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote: Hi Laune, When you say /If you can insert data for the declared incomingData and make a rule fire for each fact, the consequence could create the map from the fields of the incomingData fact and insert it/ I don't understand, how will the map be created automatically. Can you give an example or sscce http://sscce.org I did not write automatically. - In a single rule firing for each incomingData, let the RHS code create a map, put the incomingData object's fields as map elements and insert the map. -W - AA -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Seting-up-test-scenarios-for-Excel-Decision-Table-with-a-map-of-data-coming-in-tp4027995p4028005.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Seting up test scenarios for Excel Decision Table with a map of data coming in
ahh.. now I get it. You just wanted the map to be created and inserted through the rules itself. :) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Seting-up-test-scenarios-for-Excel-Decision-Table-with-a-map-of-data-coming-in-tp4027995p4028007.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] [Optaplanner] provisioning / scalability
Hi, I have a use case where multiple users need to run multiple simultaneous solvers. Is there a best practice in scaling out Optaplanner for multitenancy? Just to be clear I'm not interested in scaling out a single optimization run but instead multiple solvers. So I'm looking for pros and cons for: - multiple solvers in the same JVM - multiple JVM:s on a single machine (with multiple solvers) - multiple machine setup - virtual machine vs lxc (Docker) vs bare metal I'm also interested in provisioning of rules etc Regards, Mats ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] [Optaplanner] provisioning / scalability
On 06-02-14 14:17, Mats Norén wrote: Hi, I have a use case where multiple users need to run multiple simultaneous solvers. Is there a best practice in scaling out Optaplanner for multitenancy? Just to be clear I'm not interested in scaling out a single optimization run but instead multiple solvers. So I'm looking for pros and cons for: - multiple solvers in the same JVM Provide 1 CPU core per Solver that's running in parallel. 1 Solver saturates 1 CPU core entirely and it is ussually happy if it has 300mb of free heap space on top of it needs as a bare minimum. If there is no such free heap space, you're basically trading more cpu for less memory (due to higher GC activity). So provide 1 CPU core per Solver that's running in parallel. If you need to run 8 jobs and have 4 CPU cores, I would probably run 4 at the same time for half the time. - multiple JVM:s on a single machine (with multiple solvers) I see no reason to do that. By using 1 JVM you pool class instances, etc so use less memory overall. - multiple machine setup Definitely the way to increase Solvers running in parallel. - virtual machine vs lxc (Docker) vs bare metal No data on that yet. I'm also interested in provisioning of rules etc Let me know what works well for you and what doesn't with multitenancy! Regards, Mats ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] 6.0.1.F Guided Rule makes all argument types strings
I have a global class foo with method bar(int x, int y, string s); I added it to a globals file as alias x. In a then in an rdrl, I can select call a method on x, so I choose bar. I get 3 text boxes int[] int[] string[] And I fill in int[3 ] int[8 ] string[Hi ] The resulting source is x.bar(3, 8, Hi) - which fails validation because the first two are supposed to be ints. Do you enter ints differently? Or, is this a bug? Also note that a space is always a;ready in the text boxes so you have to delete it first. If you just start typeing hi, you will get the value Hi -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/6-0-1-F-Guided-Rule-makes-all-argument-types-strings-tp4028010.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Null pointer exception when adding drools to existing project
After 4 days of struggle, I found out that Helloworld program that drools generates is infact HELLworld. Source of issue is classpath. Following are links that better explains this problem, than what is listed in Drools wiki (or documentation). http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2012/02/jboss-drools-getting-started.html http://hocinegrine.com/2013/08/21/eclipse-maven-drools-5-5-0-final-example/ -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Null-pointer-exception-when-adding-drools-to-existing-project-tp4027944p4028011.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Seting up test scenarios for Excel Decision Table with a map of data coming in
Thank you guys, for the above I've come to use the following.
This will also make it MUCH MUCH easier for the business users to add new
rules to the decision sheets (excel) and allow them to just use a simple Job
Fact for the input of data to test against :)
For others interested, what i ended up doing was creating an DRL rule in the
following fashion as per suggestion.
rule JobMapRule
dialect mvel
when
job : Job( )
then
Map incomingData = new HashMap();
incomingData.put('workType', job.workType);
incomingData.put('status', job.status);
insert(incomingData)
retract(job)
end
This way my incomingData Fact gets created to memory, then removes the Job
Fact from memory so that it does not appear to have fired within the Test
Scenarios as well :)
Thanks for your help. This has been an extremely large learning curve this
past few days.
Cheers
Mark
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Seting-up-test-scenarios-for-Excel-Decision-Table-with-a-map-of-data-coming-in-tp4027995p4028012.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Seting up test scenarios for Excel Decision Table with a map of data coming in
Last question I hope. In the test scenario how can i stop it from telling me that the rule JobMapRule fire. Within the test scenario it does not need to know that information. Cheers Mark -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Seting-up-test-scenarios-for-Excel-Decision-Table-with-a-map-of-data-coming-in-tp4027995p4028013.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
