Can you help with any self contained unit tests, to measure, test and prove
this?
Did you set CMSClassUnloadingEnabled
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3334911/what-does-jvm-flag-cmsclassunloadingenabled-actually-do
Mark
On 6 Jan 2014, at 14:31, brachi brach...@sapiens.com wrote:
I have
I’ve been told 5.6 will be released this week. This is because the JCR2GIT
migration tool, in 5.6 is needed for our 6.0 product.
Davide's current kbase.dispose() method, on the concrete class, should just be
considered a work around for the problem. Unless this is fixed by someone in
the
issue -
no way
to unload kie modules once they are cached - which Mario has been
working on.
In either case, pmander's test works fine in both 5.6.x and 6.x after
these fixes
Davide
On 01/06/2014 07:56 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:
I’ve been told 5.6 will be released this week. This is because
Those “benchmarks” were develop in the mid 80s, they don’t have any relevancy
to judging the performance of something like Drools 6.0. For instance it would
not benefit in anyway from the lazy algorithm provided in 6.0, as it uses a
“context’ root object, which is no longer needed.
If those
We’ve only been developing this on EAP6. I expect EAP5 has a different
mechanism for it’s virtual file system, and discovery will not work. It’s
unlikely we’ll get time to investigate this right now, as EAP5 is a low
priority for us. Although patches (with tests) are always welcome.
Mark
On
The simplest and best way is to create a model to hold all your data, then use
a recursive MVEL template to generate the rule from it.
http://mvel.codehaus.org/MVEL+2.0+Templating+Guide
Mark
On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:38, Swapnil Aute swapnila...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to use drool engine to run
you’ll need to write a minimal self contained unit test:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.1.Final/drools-docs/html/Welcome.html#gettingstarted
You’ll need to submit the test to this module:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/tree/master/drools-decisiontables/src/test
Lots of
the artefact name changed:
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/service/local/repositories/releases/content/org/kie/kie-spring/6.0.1.Final/kie-spring-6.0.1.Final.jar
Mark
On 30 Dec 2013, at 08:55, dwipin dwipi...@tcs.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a project using Drools 6 with Spring.
All jars must have a pom.properties in there, for versioning and lookup. Maven
built jars will place that in there for you. We will generate a generic
pom.properties for you, if you are generating a kjar in memory with the
programmatic api - but this has very limited use cases, related to in
for 5.x, there are a number of Rest interfaces documented, for CRUD and build
operations. In 6.x you have the GIT, which has client in every language. We
have exposed the Maven operations via Rest, which also build, test, install and
deploy - see 6.x documentation.
Mark
On 27 Dec 2013, at
-2013, at 6:59 am, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
**READ ME**
The WARs in the downloads Drools Workbench link are incorrect and point to
a development test version; it has incorrect menu's and art work. The
download can still be used for the JCR2GIT migration tool. The WARs
look at the “includes” example. You can include the resources from any KieBase,
that has an ID. IF those are in another Maven module, as it as a dependency.
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/KIEChapter.html#KIEExamplesSection
Mark
On 26 Dec 2013, at 14:10,
We do not do maintenance “patch” releases of older community releases, only
product releases.
http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html
Did you check if the unit test fails on 5.5?
Mark
On 27 Dec 2013, at 02:31, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Davide
WARs at the JBoss Nexus
repository:
JBossAS 7.0
Tomcat 7.0
JBoss EAP 6.1
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/public-jboss/org/kie/kie-drools-wb-distribution-wars/6.0.1.Final/
On 21 Dec 2013, at 15:21, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
We’ve uploaded 6.0.1.
http
We’ve uploaded 6.0.1.
http://www.jboss.org/drools/downloads
http://www.jboss.org/drools/documentation
We have added some extra docs explaining versioning, settings.xml and remote
repositories:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.1.Final/drools-docs/html/KIEChapter.html#KIEDeployingSection
I turned your code into a unit test and added it to the 6.0 codebase. see the
method “testModifyAfterInsertWithPropertyReactive” in the commit:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/53ca46d3b
It works for PHREAK and RETE mode. Everything works for 6.0, we’ll try it
against 5.6.CR1 soon
();
ksession.setGlobal(list, list);
assertEquals(4, ksession.fireAllRules());
assertEquals(3, list.size());
assertEquals(3, list.get(0));
assertEquals(2, list.get(1));
assertEquals(1, list.get(2));
}
On 20 Dec 2013, at 15:14, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
I
it’s hard to see what the problem is. The parser is failing, but it’s now
showing where a bouts - i.e. inside of the wrapped exception.
Here is the MinimalPomParser:
Each update must be rebuilt and repackaged in a JAR - the JAR is our unit of
deployment, and unit of update.
You can either rebuild that using the maven plugin, or you can rebuild it at
runtime using the programmatic api. Either way make sure you remember to
increase the version.
daily snapshot builds are here for you to test:
http://downloads.jboss.org/drools/release/snapshot/6.0.x/
Mark
On 14 Dec 2013, at 08:52, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
It was a bug that has been fixed. It is available in github sources and will
be in the forthcoming release.
We do not have any file change listeners. You, or the workbench, needs to build
the jar.
What is automatic is the role of change sets before. You no longer need to
compute them, build the jar, have the client consume the jar (with different
ReleaseID) - that’s it. Drools diffs the current and
Neither the build jar files from projects, or uploaded jars, are placed in GIT.
There is a separate maven folder location for those, on the file system. See
docs for workbench configuration, that location is configurable.
Mark
On 13 Dec 2013, at 01:37, anjana.ackroyd anjana.ackr...@gmail.com
update the releaseID in the meta model, build it (it’ll be added to
KieRepository). Then on the KieContainer do updatetoVersion(String releaseId)
giving it the release ID you wish to update to, and it will update at runtime.
Mark
On 13 Dec 2013, at 23:39, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote:
Can I
see previous emails in the list:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
Subject: 6.0 issue with remote jars and dynamic modules
Date: 6 December 2013 14:39:50 GMT
To: Rules Dev List rules-...@lists.jboss.org, Rules Users List
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
just a reminder
——
There is problem, fixed in master, for remote jars. The KieRepository
currently, when using kie-ci, doesn’t obey the settings.xml active profiles.
This means it is not recognising the remote configured repositories.
While this is fixed, and we’ll have binaries out in about 2
Daily builds can currently be found here,
http://download.jboss.org/drools/release/snapshot/6.0.x/
Anyone wanting to try 6.0, but meeting some issues already discussed - such as
remote repositories, and settings.xml not working - should try the snapshots
builds there.
Mark
all fixed in the daily build, give it a try please.
http://download.jboss.org/drools/release/snapshot/6.0.x/
Mark
On 12 Dec 2013, at 19:08, vimalkansal vimalkan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks a lot Mark.
--
View this message in context:
At the moment it requires command wrapper objects, which map the object to the
method. This allows batch interactions.
There was some work for more RPC type interactions, i.e. maps camel route only
to “insert” and doesn’t need a command wrapper. But I don’t think that made 6.0.
If you know
You want to sync the changes you’ve done with a remote git repo?
The WB has a git server. What you’ll need to do from command line is clone, so
that you have a local copy you can play with. That local copy you can then push
to your remote repo, you might need to reconfigure origin, in order to
On 11 Dec 2013, at 16:54, anjana.ackroyd anjana.ackr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yay! I found the conflicting process using that port and now its all golden .
I see all the menu options.
great :)
Although it would be nice to have it working on tomcat as well because thats
the JVM we use enterprise
we have unit tests that say otherwise:
https://github.com/sotty/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test/java/org/drools/compiler/integrationtests/IncrementalCompilationTest.java
You’ll need to provide more information, or better still copy one of those unit
tests to try and create a failed
it’s not quite that automatic.
You can only do updates vis the dynamic modules system. you have to build jars
and update to the latest jar.
Go through the KIE examples docs, and the unit tests I showed you.
Mark
On 11 Dec 2013, at 22:31, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote:
Oh, I don't doubt for a
Logically insert the average, in a separate rule. This will ensure there is an
“average” fact that is maintained n the TMS. As it’s logically inserted, you
don’t need to delete it.
After any Transaction has been evaluated, you need to set a flag on it, so it’s
not processed again.
Mark
On 9
could you try with JBossAS 7.1.1? That’s the one we all use for our day to day
testing?
If you look at the set of videos in the playlist, the first one shows you how
to do setup and installation. Each video shows a different part of the
workbench. The video’s in the playlist can be played back
??
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
could you try with JBossAS 7.1.1? That’s the one we all use for our day to
day testing?
If you look at the set of videos in the playlist, the first one shows you how
to do setup and installation. Each video shows
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-camel-server-example
kmoduel at work, inside of a springs beans file:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-camel-server-example/src/main/resources/knowledge-services.xml
typica camel rout
the jira
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-367
Mark
On 6 Dec 2013, at 14:39, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
There is problem, fixed in master, for remote jars. The KieRepository
currently, when using kie-ci, doesn’t obey the settings.xml active profiles.
This means
On 7 Dec 2013, at 00:41, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote:
I have a requirement in which when a rule is changed, the change needs to be
reflected immediately without retarting the system.
In Drools 5.x we can use the changeset.xml with the knowlegde agent. Now in
Drool 6.0 we have Kie API.
Following on from the workbench videos (http://tinyurl.com/pnq6497), here is a
rule based limited entry decision table http://tinyurl.com/o6umx2x
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
You can work around this now by having a wrapper project. All to does is have a
single maven dependency on the target project, and in that you specify your
maven version ranges.
Mark
On 3 Dec 2013, at 14:30, Mario Fusco mario.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the problem with the last code you
see kie-camel:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/kie-camel
Take a look at the KIE docs, on how to build jars. everything is mavenized now.
Lots of examples
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/KIEChapter.html
Example war:
Anyone in the community want to help create and publish a new set of cheat
sheets, for the 6.0 stuff?
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
There is no harm on staying with your existing code, if it continues to work.
Start new projects with the new api and then migrate the old stuff over at your
leisure.
Mark
On 2 Dec 2013, at 04:31, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote:
Hello,
I am upgrading from Drools 5.x in which I am using the
Did you try enabling the JVM flag CMSClassUnloadingEnabled
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3334911/what-does-jvm-flag-cmsclassunloadingenabled-actually-do
This typically seems the source of most people’s leaks.
Mark
On 2 Dec 2013, at 19:10, brachi brach...@sapiens.com wrote:
how did you
At this point we are probably stuck, without a unit test that reproduces the
issue. Or better still a patch fixing it.
Mark
On 2 Dec 2013, at 19:41, brachi brach...@sapiens.com wrote:
thanks, I used CMSClassUnloadingEnabled, but this can't help because the GC
can't garbage this classes
I’ve sent a few emails on this now. See docs:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/KIEChapter.html
4.2.2.4. Defining a KieModule programmatically
4.2.5.9. Programaticaly build a Simple KieModule with Defaults
4.2.5.10. Programaticaly build a KieModule using Meta Models
http://www.jbilling.com/documentation/users/getting-started/brms
Mark
On 30 Nov 2013, at 18:31, jonatanl jonatan.laurit...@yahoo.dk wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to develop some tools that could be used for the validation of
business rules and their integration into the automatic reasoning
As per previous email:
1) Create your original project with rules, build and deploy the jar.
2) Load the JAR to create a KieContainer.
3) add or change rules. Change the maven version, build and deploy the jar.
4) Ensure the JAR is in the KieRepository, or available to maven if using
kie-ci, and
?
Sorry
Nicolas
2013/11/28 Mark Proctor [via Drools] [hidden email]
As per previous email:
1) Create your original project with rules, build and deploy the jar.
2) Load the JAR to create a KieContainer.
3) add or change rules. Change the maven version, build and deploy the jar.
4
Are creating a new ksession for each batch of insertions? Or using the same
one? If the same one, are you deleting them after insertion?
And as per wolfgang’s message, JIT might have a big impact for this.
Mark
On 25 Nov 2013, at 22:50, ch3xy igor.stri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
first
The links weren’t suppose to go up yet, sorry. We haven’t finished preparing
the videos and there is a new website to come.
In the mean time you need to read the Workbench Installation Guide:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/wb.Workbench.html#wb.Installation
And
Turn it into a maven recognised JAR, manually place a pom.properties in the
JARs META-INF. You don’t need to convert it to a maven project, with a pom.xml
in the source, or build it with maven.
Then look at the build/deploy/utiize example 4.2.5.6. Default KieSession from
File
if they have worked out the Guvnor / EAP 6.0 Resty issue just
yet? I had to resort to using Tomcat7 after installing and configuring EAP 6
because of that. :-(
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
The links weren’t suppose to go up yet, sorry. We haven’t
a lot has been fixed in 5.6 and 6.0. Please either try 5.6.CR1 or 6.0.FINAL.
Mark
On 25 Nov 2013, at 15:33, gboro54 gbor...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue seems to be related to:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Property-reactive-broken-in-5-5-0-Final-td4021231.html
The rest api has changed. Depoyment has changed. We don’t have “packages” any
more. We have projects.
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/wb.WorkbenchIntegration.html#drools.WorkbenchRemoteAPI
/repositories/{repositoryName}/projects/{projectName}/maven/compile
Comments inline. But just a reminder, if you see how to improve the docs,
please contribute.
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html/Welcome.html#gettingstarted
Mark
On 25 Nov 2013, at 19:52, SrjTx clickt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks guys!
Here's our use-case/flow.
We’ve just found (and fixed) a no-loop bug.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-353
In general we recommend @PropertyReactive over no-loop (and lock-on-active),
for best practice.
If you hit this bug, which is caused by a modify, and you cannot migrate your
stuff to @PropertyReactive you
6 videos now. Added another one.
Any feedback? Hope people feel the wait was worth it, compared to the UI in 5.x
We are just updating the website and preparing the communication, 6.0 will be
landing shortly.
Mark
On 21 Nov 2013, at 01:57, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
5 short
Updated tiny url. Seems adding the 6th video, changes the published url, and
the old url is in correct order:
http://tinyurl.com/pnq6497
On 21 Nov 2013, at 11:54, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
6 videos now. Added another one.
Any feedback? Hope people feel the wait was worth
create additional rules, with just the patterns you know you want to match and
record the result in the consequence - so you can check/assert later.
Mark
On 20 Nov 2013, at 20:49, swaroop swaroop.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
Is there any way to determine which conditions matched/passed from
5 short videos, to be played individually or continuously (play all) in the
playlist, that demonstrates the new Workbench.
http://tinyurl.com/nhqtdqu
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
The documentation we have has now become very large, and is not easy to
maintain and keep up to date with a small team our size. We rely on community
contributions for this. Now that you have figured this out, my suggestion is to
get involved and help us update the documentation. The
Are you saying the permgen is leaking? That you update the rules, and no
perigean space is reclaimed?
There are some issues with the JVM, that I’ve seen before, which may be the
problem. Such as the CMSClassUnloadingEnabled issue:
http://java.dzone.com/articles/busting-permgen-myths
I’d be
I think it depends on the system. When we have symbols it attempts to see if
they are classes are not, on some systems the file system does not recognise
type and can get confused.
Mark
On 18 Nov 2013, at 15:17, Alexander Herwix a...@herwix.com wrote:
I actually got it to compile and work
I found that if you explicitly import the class, it can resolve the issue -
instead of relying on package imports.
Mark
On 18 Nov 2013, at 18:31, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
I think it depends on the system. When we have symbols it attempts to see if
they are classes
We don’t provide anything out of the box. But as RxJava supports pluggable
Observers, you can just add your own that calls insert/update/delete.
We are investigating deeper integration for RxJava in the future.
Mark
On 16 Nov 2013, at 08:11, sirinath sirinath19...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it
It has to be a maven project, it needs to find pom.properties. Or atleast the
project you are building must obey maven conventions of including a
pom.properties in the correct location; even if it’s not built by maven.
Versioning is now “built in” as standard, via the maven conventions.
none of those are related to improving performance.
Mark
On 15 Nov 2013, at 22:33, Arul Prashanth arul.prasha...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what these options are for and does this configuration help in
reducing the rule execution time and memory usage. I couldn't find much
details on
The engine itself is independent of any language. There are two components to
building a new language - the parser and the compiler.
However the api’s for this are not that clean at present .We use to maintain a
Clips language,as an example, for a while - but no one used it, so it got left
http://blog.athico.com/2013/11/space-invaders-in-8-minutes-with-drools.html
—
Following in the same fashion of Pong and Wumpus World, I've written a
simplified Space Invaders game. I've uploaded it to youtube, make sure you
watch it in high quality and full screen, to avoid blur text:
We don’t do hybrid business models - i.e. holding back the best for the
product.
Everything will be available in the community. The product is just a hardened,
sanitized and long live support branch of what you have in community.
being done for UberFire or
if this was an other project. I guess I phrased the question completely
wrong in that aspect.
Mark Proctor wrote
We don’t do hybrid business models - i.e. holding back the best for the
product.
Everything will be available in the community. The product
not right now. But there is nothing to stop someone doing an adapter up at
github, as a 3rd party project.
MArk
On 5 Nov 2013, at 11:11, Bernard Szlachta bernard.szlac...@nobleprog.co.uk
wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know whether there is any chance that Drools API may comply with
-pipeline was a POC, that was never developed further. Camel replaces it in
every way.
Mark
On 5 Nov 2013, at 11:28, scarlettxu xu_han...@163.com wrote:
when I come to find a service which can expose web service API to execute the
drools rules remotely.
I firstly find the
Davide,
Thank you for al your hard work on this. It’s great when community people step
up to help drive the project forward.
The core team won’t have time for any final QAing of this, so it’s up to the
community to test this and make sure it’s ok.
Good luck :)
Mark
On 1 Nov 2013, at 21:04,
http://blog.athico.com/2013/10/configuration-and-convention-based.html
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2013, at 07:27, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/10/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
We didn’t leave it broken, it got broke over time, via community pull
requests.
Please explain how a released x.y.z-Final can break over time.
-W
We are working on documentation,and trying to scan the code for mistakes or
missed things.
Mark
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:26, Juan Ignacio Barisich juan.baris...@gmail.com wrote:
There is enough information for me.
Thanks a lot Mauricio.
2013/10/28 Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com
We
to resolve those
things. If anyone wants to help, please contact him. Quicker those are fixed,
quicker it can be released.
Mark
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:44, Jonathan Knehr jonathan.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get 5.6 out before 6.0? Feel like it's been awhile now
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Mark
01:01 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:
We went to publish it last week, there were a few failing tests. Once those
are fixed, it can be released. Fixing that though relies on community
involvement, as core engineers prioritise working on the most recent
branches. Davide Sottara, from the community, has
By default the rule engine has no concept of latest, there is simply the data
that is currently present. It evaluates that data to produce activations, and
then fires those.
If you need the notion of latest, and are unable to emulate this yourself, you
can switch the engine to steam mode and
insertLogical does retract the inserted fact, if it’s supported becomes false.
Mark
On 27 Oct 2013, at 18:52, mikerod mjr4...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that there is no concept within the engine of latest. I the
surprising behavior to me here was that the rule seems to become invalidated
I don't think any of us have said that 'from' is not good to use. Only that you
should understand how it works; with regards to not being reactive, and that
it's a linear iteration.
Mark
On 15 Oct 2013, at 04:22, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I remember seeing some best practice
A lot has changed since April. You'll need to build master and try it against
that. If the issue not related to more than 64 fields, you'll need to write a
unit test against master.
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
Mark
On
5.6 is pretty much ready to go, someone just has to build it and upload
binaries. I'd recommend you build 5.6 and try those binaries.
Mark
On 15 Oct 2013, at 18:53, Bransford-Koons, Geoff
geoff.bransford-ko...@teradata.com wrote:
I’m trying to update our application from Drools 4.0.7 to
The rule template stuff has not been migrated to the new api - it's mostly just
there so it doesn't break legacy systems. We recommend people to use the web
based rule decision tables and rule templates, which we do put our efforts into
maintaining and keeping current.
Mark
On 12 Oct 2013,
We go over kie api and conf here, starting at slide 96. Slide 109 shows
kie-scanner in use.
http://www.slideshare.net/MarkProctor/ireland-augam2013
Mark
On 11 Oct 2013, at 11:05, Martin Minka martin.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
are there somewhere examples how to:
1. use KieScanner
2. how to
yes, would be great it someone could make an online tutorial :)
Mark
On 11 Oct 2013, at 18:57, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/10/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
We go over kie api and conf here, starting at slide 96. Slide 109 shows
kie-scanner in use
example rest/camel in new xml
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/kie-camel/src/test/resources/org/kie/camel/component/CxfRsSpring.xml
Mark
On 10 Oct 2013, at 12:56, clayton.tabone clayton.tab...@go.com.mt wrote:
Hi,
In Drools 5 it was possible to configure a
Are you using property reactive? That places a 64 property limit.
Mark
On 8 Oct 2013, at 17:05, haoruiq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a strange problem these days, I declared a new class a.b in drl
file using keyword declare, it has too many properties, larger than 64,
then
You can use the marshaller to copy the entire state of the rule engine. It
works with JPA integration, by recording the JPA reference handle when it
serialises.
Mark
On 7 Oct 2013, at 10:56, sirinath sirinath19...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have the ability to journal fact /
Only unit tats, the stuff is very alpha and raw.
The more recent stuff on pluggable belief systems, is a little easier to start
with. But again nothing more than unit tests, or this blog entry:
http://www.dzone.com/links/pluggable_belief_systems_in_drools_60.html
Mark
On 6 Oct 2013, at 02:01,
It wil continue to be improved during 6.0. It will get increasingly more
attention.
We have developed a new pluggable belief system to support chance research.
http://www.dzone.com/links/pluggable_belief_systems_in_drools_60.html
Mark
On 2 Oct 2013, at 13:12, kurrent93 kurren...@gmail.com
Right now the DSL stuff has been under developed for years. I actually wanted
to remove it completely, as we don't have the resources to develop it fufther,
and unfortunately it's not an item that has been picked up by community
developers.
I was persuaded to keep it, by those using it, but it
a few of the examples are broken in 6.0, we'll try and fix those soon.
Mark
On 25 Sep 2013, at 16:56, ru soro...@oogis.ru wrote:
Hello drools-community,
I tried to run Manners Benchmark test and got this error message:
assign first seat : [Seating id=1 , pid=1 , pathDone=true ,
Did you read the getting involved page?
If you have a bug, please open a JIRA and submit a unit test as a pull request:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
Mark
On 24 Sep 2013, at 14:48, Nicocb ndreui...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a
no :(
Mark
On 12 Jun 2013, at 06:18, mars137 atif.ta...@tcs.com wrote:
Would decision tree be available in new version of drools i.e. Version 6?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Decision-tree-availability-tp4024261.html
Sent from the Drools: User
This can happen, if you mix and match wrong versions of jars on your class path.
Mark
On 18 Sep 2013, at 18:10, Davide Sottara dso...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems strange, since FileSystemResource implements InternalResource.
Which version are you using?
Davide
On 09/18/2013 07:25 AM,
you are mixing jar versions. Specifically project 5.1.1 and product 5.0.1.
If you are customer with a Red Hat BRMS subscription, can you please ask this
question on the customer support portal. Where it will be handled under SLA for
guaranteed response times.
Either way, you can't mix and
Unless you are using fireUntilHalt there is now no longer any async reactivity.
As discussed before, we have a stronger separation now between passive and
reactive mode.
If you want to see what's happening, there is now a new trace debug
information. You'll need a logback file similar to
201 - 300 of 1761 matches
Mail list logo
