[rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server

2012-10-12 Thread alopez
Hi, I'm migrating rules from a Guvnor 5.2.x site to the new beta, I did this by exporting the old repo and importing in the new one. I can see the packages and rules OK now in the new 5.5 Beta 1, creating snapshots works OK. But build does not, I get an: 500 The call failed on the server;

Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server

2012-10-12 Thread alopez
Thanks, and I forgot to explain that, the console in the server is completely silent, if I create a snapshot I can see some Info messages displaying, but when building and the error appears the console has no messages. -- View this message in context:

Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server

2012-10-12 Thread alopez
Yes, that is the one we are monitoring (tomcat in this case), we see this: INFO 12-10 11:58:59,435 (LoggingHelper.java:info:49) USER:admin CREATING MODULE SNAPSHOT for module: [ihtsdoBaseRules] snapshot name: [ihtsdoBaseRules but it does not show anything new if we try to build... --

Re: [rules-users] 5.5 Beta1 Guvnor Issue 500 The call failed on the server

2012-10-12 Thread alopez
Thanks, will do that. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-5-Beta1-Guvnor-Issue-500-The-call-failed-on-the-server-tp4020260p4020266.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-10-05 Thread alopez
Hi Marc, Mario, I'm using the same test case on this thread, and oing more tests I now realized what is the problem, this leak appears only if the pom file has the dependency to jbpm-bpmn2 5.1.0.Final along with Drools 5.2.x or 5.3.x. Re-reading Jamie's post earlier I was puzzled by his

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-10-05 Thread alopez
Yes, I got the same exception, you can't remove all listeners from the outside (at least in 5.2.0.Final), that's why I patched the AbstractWorkingMemory class to hardcode the listeners removal inside Drools. But now that I found JBPM 5.1.1.Final that seems to solve the problem in a better way,

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-10-04 Thread alopez
Good news, I followed your advice and patched drools-core to prevent this, focusing on removing all listeners: AbstractWorkingMemory.java, line 1246: for ( Iterator it = this.__ruleBaseEventListeners.iterator(); it.hasNext(); ) { this.ruleBase.removeEventListener( (RuleBaseEventListener)

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-10-03 Thread alopez
This memory leak is giving us a lot of problems... we need to iteratively test 400,000 items, one session for each. It was working fine with 5.1.1 and now is failing. Thanks for the test case, is very simple to reproduce, but I tried running it with: dependency groupIdorg.drools/groupId

[rules-users] Guvnor support of custom operators

2010-08-05 Thread alopez
Hi, I'm using custom operators in Drools, implementing EvaluatorDefinition and BaseEvaluator interfaces, and adding them to the KnowledgeBuilderConfiguration. (tested on 5.01) Is there a way to make these new operators available in the Guvnor guided editor? Thanks! Alejandro -- View this