Everything looks ok except when CTRL backspace for content assistance is
used it throws this exception. Any one has any clue?

java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.eclipse.ui.internal.editors.text.JavaFileEditorInput
at
org.drools.ide.editors.completion.RuleCompletionProcessor.getDSLAdapter(
RuleCompletionProcessor.java:549)
at
org.drools.ide.editors.completion.RuleCompletionProcessor.getCompletionP
roposals(RuleCompletionProcessor.java:63)
at
org.drools.ide.editors.completion.AbstractCompletionProcessor.computeCom
pletionProposals(AbstractCompletionProcessor.java:33)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.ContentAssistant.computeCompletionP
roposals(ContentAssistant.java:1612)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.computeProp
osals(CompletionProposalPopup.java:473)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.access$17(C
ompletionProposalPopup.java:470)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup$2.run(Compl
etionProposalPopup.java:405)
at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.showProposa
ls(CompletionProposalPopup.java:399)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.ContentAssistant.showPossibleComple
tions(ContentAssistant.java:1441)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.source.SourceViewer.doOperation(SourceViewer.java
:777)
at
org.eclipse.jface.text.source.projection.ProjectionViewer.doOperation(Pr
ojectionViewer.java:1519)
at
org.eclipse.ui.texteditor.TextOperationAction$1.run(TextOperationAction.
java:131)
at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67)
at
org.eclipse.ui.texteditor.TextOperationAction.run(TextOperationAction.ja
va:129)
at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:499)
at org.eclipse.ui.commands.ActionHandler.execute(ActionHandler.java:185)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.handlers.LegacyHandlerWrapper.execute(LegacyHand
lerWrapper.java:109)
at org.eclipse.core.commands.Command.executeWithChecks(Command.java:461)
at
org.eclipse.core.commands.ParameterizedCommand.executeWithChecks(Paramet
erizedCommand.java:424)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.handlers.HandlerService.executeCommand(HandlerSe
rvice.java:160)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.executeCommand(WorkbenchK
eyboard.java:466)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.press(WorkbenchKeyboard.j
ava:799)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.processKeyEvent(Workbench
Keyboard.java:846)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.filterKeySequenceBindings
(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:564)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.access$3(WorkbenchKeyboar
d.java:506)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard$KeyDownFilter.handleEvent
(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:122)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.filterEvent(Display.java:982)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:927)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:952)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:937)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendKeyEvent(Widget.java:965)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendKeyEvent(Widget.java:961)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.wmChar(Widget.java:1275)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.WM_CHAR(Control.java:3346)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.windowProc(Control.java:3246)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.windowProc(Display.java:4025)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.OS.DispatchMessageW(Native Method)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.OS.DispatchMessage(OS.java:1925)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2966)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:1914)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:1878)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:4
19)
at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)
at
org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:95)
at
org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActiva
tor.java:78)
at
org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplicat
ion(EclipseAppLauncher.java:92)
at
org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(Eclip
seAppLauncher.java:68)
at
org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:
400)
at
org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:
177)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:336)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:280)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:977)
at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:952)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ho, Alan
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:07 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Short-circuit rules by group?!

Sorry, I take back what I said about the previous email - when I was
refering to agenda groups, I actually ment activation groups. 

But thinking about it more, I think activation groups might be a ok.
Just makes sure that all rules in the activation group have the same
consequence.

Regards,
Alan Ho 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ho, Alan
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 4:04 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Short-circuit rules by group?!

I won't recommend using agenda groups in this case. If you want to make
sure that a message is sent once and only once per customer, the
predicate for each rule should look like :

When
        customer : Customer()
        "Your custom business logic" && !customer.sentAEvent Then
        sendEventToCustomer
        customer.sentAEvent = true
        drools.assert(customer.sentAEvent)
End


This will ensure that only one event would get sent. Even if you use
Agenda Groups, you can't prevent the LHS (condition statement) to be
evaluated for every single rule. In the case where you have multiple
rule's LHS are evaluted to be true, the "drools.assert" executed during
the first valid rule would cause a revaluation of all rules that has
"!customer.sentEvent" in its condition. When the re-evaluations reoccur,
the !customer.sendAEvent is evaluated to false, hence a event is never
sent twice to the customer.

Agenda groups isn't a good idea because then your agenda groups is
tightly tied to the data. You might end up creating more and more agenda
groups for each customer.

Does that make sense :P

Regards,
Alan Ho

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jdepaul
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:43 AM
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Short-circuit rules by group?!


I have several rules defined in groups by Customer, so I have number of
rules for Walmart, some rules for NIKE, more rules for SomeCustomer...
When one of the rules matches for a given customer I need to send an
event notification.  I need to make sure that I send only ONE event
notification per Customer (regardless of how many rules were matched),
thus after finding the very first match in the Walmart group, I'd like
to activate a rule, and then short-circuit and "Skip" to the next group
of rules for NIKE - to see if any of the matches are found in the next
group.  

I've implemented this functionality using a Match object, which I assert
into WorkingMemory whenever I find a match for customer, then all my
rules check for absence of Match for given customer...

This works, but I wonder if there is a better way to do it - using
Agenda Groups, maybe - once I find ONE match for Walmart, skip to the
next Agenda Group?!  Could someone comment on this?

THanks,
James
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Short-circuit-rules-by-group-%21-tf3222142.html#a8
949165
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to