Wolfgang's answer is spot on. Pretend that you are not using an
engine... imagine that you are implementing a java method in a java
application to handle this use case... how would you do it? Either you use
the timestamp at the source or the timestamp at the engine. Either you
execute your actio
I guess the engine use the insert fact timestamp and not the annotated
timestamp for the non-existence of a event. Think it would not be easy to
implement the engine, because you need to take care of past and future
events. And for past events, both the events where the trigger did not pass
yet and
Use the "true" time of the event for the event's @imestamp attribute
and do not rely on the automatic timestamp added by the engine.
Of course, if some event is delayed on the wire, rules checking the
absence of an event will still fire incorrectly.
-W
On 14/03/2012, javadude wrote:
> Hi !
> s
Hi !
scenario: Event A then Event B. If there is no Event B after 5 min of A then
trigger rule.
*when
time1:(Event) from entry-point xxx
not (Event(this after[ 0,5m ] time1)) from entry-point xxx
then
...
end*
For realtime event that works fine, but in real life you have the event
coming in d
