I am facing one more issue with calling a method in lhs of the rule ..
When I call a method as mentioned below ('getValue' is the method in class
'customObject' and 'numberofObjects' is method in class 'AnotherObject') ;
the drl file has problems in saving in eclipse.
The error says like 'Multip
rhs part worked ok now..
I am facing one more issue with calling a method in lhs of the rule ..
When I call a method as mentioned below ('getValue' is the method in class
'customObject' and 'numberofObjects' is method in class 'AnotherObject') ;
the drl file has problems in saving in eclipse.
The
Assuming callA() and callB() are methods on $C, you are missing a comma
in between them.
modify ($C)
{
callA("UNIX"),
callB("PERL")
}
Edson
2011/9/27 Tinku
> I try to add two java method calls in the RHS of the rule .It doesnot allow
> me to save the DRL file in eclipse .It complaints
I try to add two java method calls in the RHS of the rule .It doesnot allow
me to save the DRL file in eclipse .It complaints "Multiple Markers at this
line".
However ,commenting one of the method in the RHS works fine ,with-out any
issue..
Could you pls help me in this..
Example :
when
$B : c
There was an issue within the class that was used to insert the facts..Hence
the value was not inserted properly..
The result of the printing the value is now as 'ORACLE'..
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Not-able-to-call-parameterizied-Java-method-in-
What do you get when you omit the eval and print the return value of
$B.getValue("Database")?
-W
On 27 September 2011 15:14, Tinku wrote:
> I tried to invoke parameterizied call to the java method and tried to
> compare
> the return parameter from the method in the 'eval' function..The rule is
>
I tried to invoke parameterizied call to the java method and tried to compare
the return parameter from the method in the 'eval' function..The rule is not
getting executed ..
I am not sure if it is unable to invoke the java method and fetch the return
parameter or there is an issue with rule synta
