Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Question-about-custom-accumulation-functions-tp3280838p4026504.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

I started the question in a new thread @ http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Unexpected-behavior-of-accumulate-and-insertLogical-when-the-result-goes-from-matching-a-constraint-g-tp4026507.html -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Question-about-custom

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

intermediate matches of the LHS, are not being retracted when the LHS becomes false later on. Is this expected behavior? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Question-about-custom-accumulation-functions-tp3280838p4026504.html Sent from the Drools: User

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

Hi Edson, Good news: the problem does not happen, neither with the 5.2.0.Final nor with the latest snapshot. Best regards, Bruno. Le 08/09/2011 17:17, Edson Tirelli a écrit : Bruno, Can you please test it with latest snapshot? If it is still a problem, then please open a JIRA and

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

Good. Thanks for letting us know. Edson 2011/9/14 Bruno Freudensprung bruno.freudenspr...@temis.com Hi Edson, Good news: the problem does not happen, neither with the 5.2.0.Final nor with the latest snapshot. Best regards, Bruno. Le 08/09/2011 17:17, Edson Tirelli a écrit :

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

Hi Edson, hi all, To stick to the subject, I have a strange problem (stack trace in PS) with a rule containing two accumulate calls, the result of the first one is re-injected as the input of the second one. Those accumulate functions are home made. The first one (tokenize) returns an

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

It looks like a bug, as it should not raise a NPE no matter what which version of Drools are you using? Edson 2011/9/8 Bruno Freudensprung bruno.freudenspr...@temis.com ** Hi Edson, hi all, To stick to the subject, I have a strange problem (stack trace in PS) with a rule

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

I am using Drools 5.1.1. Do you want me to package a small maven project exhibiting that error, and post a Jira? Bruno. Le 08/09/2011 15:04, Edson Tirelli a écrit : It looks like a bug, as it should not raise a NPE no matter what which version of Drools are you using? Edson

Re: [rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

Bruno, Can you please test it with latest snapshot? If it is still a problem, then please open a JIRA and provide the test to reproduce it... https://hudson.jboss.org/jenkins/view/Drools%20jBPM/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/drools-distribution/target/ Thanks, Edson

[rules-users] Question about custom accumulation functions

Hi, While testing my custom accumulation function I noticed an unexpected behavior (th'ats of course a personal point of view). It seems that Drools 5.1 calls accumulate(...) and getResult(...) as many times as the number of accumulated facts (accumulate, getResult, accumulate, getResult,